By: Choo Zheng Xi
HKP: “You cannot forever prevent different versions of history from being propagated by different people. In a free society, there will be many different views and the competition of ideas can only be healthy
Businessman and onetime journalist and student activist Ho Kwon Ping is set to deliver his first public lecture on politics and government on 20 October 2014 in his capacity as the first S R Nathan Fellow for the Study of Singapore. The talk is part of a series of lectures on Singapore intended to spark public debate about issues of national interest.

Ho Kwon Ping
(Ho Kwon Ping, Image credit:Singapore Management University)

Mr Ho is the Executive Chairman of Banyan Tree Holdings and the Chairman of the Singapore Management University. In 1977, Mr Ho was detained under the Internal Security Act for two months because of allegedly pro-communist writings in the Far Easter Economic Review.
TOC caught up with Mr Ho to ask him some questions about history, current affairs, and the future of Singapore. We talk to him about the ban on Tan Pin Pin’s film “To Singapore With Love”, events in Hong Kong, and governance in an era of social media.
You can sign up for the talk here.
 
CZX: Your first lecture is on politics and Government. We now live in a media environment where these issues are being pretty vociferously discussed both online and in the mainstream press. How do you see your lectures adding value to what’s already being discussed in public discourse?
HKP: Politics by its very nature focuses on issues which have an almost immediate impact on people’s lives. Since the IPS-Nathan lecture series is being launched to coincide with the 50th anniversary of Singapore’s independence, I’ve chosen to have a long term view, to look at some issues we will face over the next 50 years.
One would think that this will make things pretty dull, to think so long-term. But with Singapore very much in transition politically, it is in fact the longer term issues which are interesting and will have greatest impact on Singaporeans – not what will happen this or next year.
 
CZX: One topical issue that’s come up recently MDA’s decision to rate Tan Pin Pin’s film about exiles “To Singapore With Love” as “not acceptable for all ratings”. While your lecture is about looking to the future, to what extent do you think moving ahead confidently as a nation is contingent on coming to terms with the ghosts of our past?
HKP: Of course moving into the future requires an understanding and coming to terms with the past – whether it be Germany and Japan over their own WW 2 legacies, or China over Tiananmen.
History is so fascinating precisely because its interpretation changes over time, and in the next 50 years, historians will revisit the past 50 and its events, and have differing views.   I have not seen Tan Pin Pin’s film and therefore cannot comment on why it should be banned. I am not sure that screening it would mean “coming to terms with the ghosts of our past”.
But I think you cannot forever prevent different versions of history from being propagated by different people. In a free society, there will be many different views and the competition of ideas can only be healthy.
 
CZX: What lessons, if any, do you think the events of Hong Kong hold for the future of Singapore?
HKP: To me, the central lesson of Hong Kong is about the loss of legitimacy and trust, and not the issue of direct democracy per se. China has not reneged on its part of the bargain struck with the UK in 1997; and even the most naïve Hong Konger knows that the road to direct democracy will be paved with difficult negotiations and compromises.
But the performance of the leadership since 1997 has been so uniformly in the interests of only Beijing and the Hong Kong elites, that the ordinary Hong Kong person feels that he or she has no one to represent their interests – whether in Hong Kong itself or in Beijing. That has unleashed a groundswell of anger and anxiety.
The lesson for Singapore is that legitimacy and trust – the key to an effective social compact – cannot be conferred by simply having leadership chosen through “legal” means, whether it be by direct or indirect  democracy.
It takes many years for a social compact to be created, and much less time for it to crumble. As Singapore moves tentatively into the New Normal, it is important that we – both the government as well as the electorate – create a political culture where the legitimacy of the governors is earned, and the trust of the people is not betrayed. That social compact never existed in Hong Kong, and the result can be widely seen today.  ​
 
CZX: Part of the focus of your first lecture is on government in the age of social media. Henry Kissinger, in a recent interview with The Spectator, had this to say about the effect of the internet on policymaking:

‘One needs to differentiate between information, knowledge and wisdom. In the internet era they tend to get mixed up. The more time one spends simply absorbing information, the less time one has to apply wisdom.”

Not to overlap too substantively with what you’re going to be talking about at your lecture, but what are your thoughts on this quote?
 
HKP: This quote reminds me of pundits who said that the advent of television was a great dumbing down because people would read fewer books and spend less time talking to each other. That of course is true in some ways and not true in others.
The fact is that as media channels have increased over time – from books to radio, from radio to TV, from TV to the internet and social media – people have spent less time on “wisdom” and more on just trying to filter information to glean the core of an idea.
But to decry this is like saying that only Socrates and Confucius, with their lack of distracting media channels like the internet or TV, were wiser.
You cannot go back to wish for what is not. We just need to develop ways of compressing and interpreting information so that modern-day Socrates and Confucius can still have time to think big ideas. I bet that both of them would have enjoyed Facebook and used Google …
The real impact of the internet, in my view, is not the overload of information, which is what Kissinger suggests. I think it is the demise of the gatekeeper of information. That means on one hand, a lot of unfiltered junk and even socially harmful stuff on the internet with no gatekeeper (editor or censor as the case may be), but it also means that governments have lost much of the power which comes with control of information.
This impact on governance will be huge, and governments must think through how they will govern effectively in the age of social media.
 
CZX: Can you give us a sneak preview of one key issue you’ll be exploring in your lecture?
HKP: Come and listen to the talk! ….​
 

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

司机拍摄醉酒女乘客放上网,遭德士公司解雇

日前一名康福德高(ComfortDelgro)的德士司机拍摄没付钱的醉酒女乘客,并将视频放上网,结果遭康福德高终止合约。 康福德高企业有限公司集团联络总监陈爱玲昨日(15日)表示对于司机处理的方式无法谅解,并已终止他的聘雇合约。 “我们已经和乘客取得联系,并向他转达我们的调查结果”,她表示。 视频于周日(14日)上传到脸书各大网页中,从视频课件司机不停重复询问乘客缴付车费,两人都站在车子外。 司机在莱佛士一号载了该名乘客后,因疑似乘客拒绝付钱,便对着乘客拍摄并说,“我会让你出名”。 而该名乘客在视频中看得出脚步不稳,而且不停重复她想要付款。她试图从后侧拿出包包,但包包却不在车上。 “你在浪费我的时间。你浪费了大家的时间。”司机说道。“我已经报警,叫警察来处理了。” 对此,陈爱玲也说,“我们也希望借此机会提醒我们的德士司机,在遇到醉酒及拒付车资的乘客时,勿自行处理,而是应该报警并通知公司,我们将尽力协助他们。” 视频被上传到新加坡华人华语网,已被转发逾1300次。针对司机的行为,网友表示不太认同,谴责司机不应将视频上载至网络进行公审。部分网友认为女乘客是遗失包包,并不是有意不付钱 网友 Patrick Chng:…

MRT trips between Choa Chu Kang and Jurong East stations extended to 20 mins this morning due to a track fault

The MRT trips between Choa Chu Kang MRT and Jurong East MRT…

经济师预测 第二季经济年比将萎缩11.8巴仙

新加坡金融管理局发布最新经济师调查报告,指经济师预测今年第二季将年比萎缩11.巴仙。与此同时,今年经济增长预测,也下调到萎缩5.8巴仙。 这比起上一次调查的0.6巴仙预测还要低。 25名受访经济师,预测今年经济增长,可能萎缩介于4.1至6巴仙,但预计明年回弹4.8巴仙。 贸工部早前已下调对今年的经济预测,预计今年经济萎缩4至7巴仙。 冠状病毒19疫情在全球仍未消退,全球经济前景仍不明朗,相信这也致使当局决定下调今年的经济增长预测。  

菲塔阿尔火山爆发 我国多趟班机受影响

菲律宾火山爆发,马尼拉机场终止航班起降,导致多国的航班,包括我国超过15趟的航班被迫取消或更改时间。 直至今日上午,部分起降航班才局部恢复。 菲律宾塔阿尔火山(Taal Volcano)于12日下午发生潜水爆发,喷发出高达数十米的火山灰烬,触发可能发生“火山海啸”的警报。 当地政府立刻将居民撤离,马尼拉国际机场管理局(MIAA)也在当帖发出文告,表示所有起降航班都被暂停,更建议旅客和各自航空公司进行更换班机协调。 在我国,除了新加坡航空受到影响,其他被迫暂停或更换航班时段的航空公司有酷航、捷星亚洲、宿务太平洋航空和菲律宾航空的航班。 影响最严重的属捷星亚洲,有多达八趟班机需要重新编排起降事件,其中包括原定于12日下午4时30分至今早6时30分飞往马尼拉的三趟班机,以及原定于今天凌晨起飞至晚上9时30分返回我国的三趟班机。另外的两趟受影响班机则是往返克拉克的。 取消的航班则包括了原定于昨晚至今天凌晨之间飞往马尼拉的新航SQ918、菲航PR512、PR510、宿航 5J804、 5J806,以及两班原定于昨天飞抵我国的菲航PR 509和宿航5J803。 惟,原本定于昨晚11时30分抵达新加坡的酷航TR391航班,延迟至今午1时30分才会抵达我国,而班机上将有180名乘客。该航空发言人表示,基于当地住宿选项有限,因此优先为携带老幼和有其他需求的家庭客户安排入住酒店。…