Roy Ngerng, the blogger at the centre of a defamation suit filed by Lee Hsien Loong and who is also involved with the CPF protests in recent months, posted the following on his blog on 27 September.
r9
Mr Ngerng might have been carried away by the adrenalin from the previous day’s rowdy protest at Hong Lim Park (Speakers’ Corner), and made the erroneous – and rather inflated – claim that the protest was “the first march in Singapore since independence.”
The claim is not quite true, actually.
In fact, there have been not a few marches – whether at Hong Lim Park itself or in other public areas – in Singapore throughout the years, post-independence.
We highlight here some of the more prominent ones.
Barely one and a half months after our independence on 9 August 1965, Nanyang University students took to the streets and attempted to march in protest for the expulsion of 85 students from the university.
The police, however, halted the march before it started.
It was 30 October 1965:
nantah 1965
Then, a year later, on 12 October 1966, there was a protest march by some 1,000 University of Singapore students to “demand for university autonomy , academic freedom, and withdrawal of suitability certificates for freshmen.”
uos protest march
 
uosprotest2
Protest marches were not limited to those who were protesting against the authorities here.
The Singapore Government-affiliated National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has mounted several protests too.
In June 1973, the NTUC organised a protest march to the French embassy here to express its concerns over the French’s nuclear tests in the pacific.
ntuc protest french 1
And on May 11, 1988, “the (NTUC) staged a massive protest involving 4,000 workers in Shenton Way to signal its unhappiness with the United States for interfering with Singapore’s domestic politics”, a Straits Times report in 2012 said.
“While some saw it as a strike, it was more of a public protest, said NTUC president emeritus John De Payva, who participated in it.”
Another report said the NTUC “drove buses around the U.S. embassy, held a rally attended by four thousand workers, and issued a statement deriding the U.S. as ‘sneaky, arrogant, and untrustworthy’.”
ntucprotest us
ntucprotestus2
In more recent times, perhaps the group most known for holding public protests and marches (attempted or otherwise) would be the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).
The most famous attempt by the SDP at conducting a march would be the one in 2006, during the meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at Suntec City.
The SDP had planned to march from Hong Lim Park to the convention centre and Parliament house. However, they were surrounded and stopped by the police from doing so.
What transpired was a 3-day stand-off between the authorities and the political opposition party.
sdp
While the SDP may have failed to hold the march as it had planned that day, the party and its supporters were more successful three months later – when, wearing yellow t-shirts, it commemorated International Human Rights Day with a Freedom Walk from Speakers’ Corner to the Istana and to Changi Prison where the SDP leader, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was being incarcerated for speaking in public without a permit.
sdpwalk
Two years later, on 15 March 2008, the SDP held a march and protest on World Consumers’ Day (WCD), from Orchard Road to Parliament.
Along the way, however, the group was stopped and eventually arrested by the police.
Here is a video of the march:

The SDP’s WCD march was similar to the one held the previous year by the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), also on World Consumer’s Day, in the downtown area.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The manner in which the two similar events were treated by the authorities gave rise to questions by members of the public. (Read here: “A CASE of double standards?”)
But Singaporeans were not the only ones who have held public marches and protests.
One example of foreigners getting in on this was the Orchard Road march-cum-protest by Burmese nationals in 2007, when Burma was in political turmoil as the military junta massacred its own people, including monks.
A group of Burmese working in Singapore decided to show solidarity with their countrymen back home and held a march in Orchard Road in December.

As for marches and protests in Hong Lim Park itself, well, Mr Ngerng is wrong as well, for Saturday’s CPF march/protest at the park is not the “first march since independence” held at the park either.
In 2013, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) commemorated International Women’s Day with a march and protest at the park calling for equality.
The news gave it scant attention but here is a video which The Online Citizen took of the event:

It is understandable that in times of great emotional controversy that things will be said and many claims made.
But it is equally important, after the emotions have settled, that we know what is fact, and what is driven by adrenalin and which may not necessarily be accurate, or true.
As for Mr Ngerng’s claims that Saturday’s protest was also “the first protest in front of a minister”, that too is not quite true, but we’ll leave that for another day.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

各国”反假新闻法“比一比

我国总理李显龙在本月9日,在新马领导人非正式会议后的联合记者会上,被记者质问其对防假消息法的立场。 记者指防假消息法遭到新加坡国内外人士质疑,包括”无国界记者“组织也抨击新法案可能赋予政府过大权力。 当时,总理表示,不清楚马国打算废除的《反假新闻法》内容,不过他捍卫新加坡政府要推行的《防止网络假消息和网络操纵法案》,指出不止新加坡,德国、法国和澳洲都有立法对付,连英国也考虑透过司法管制网络假消息。 既然总理提到其他国家也有反假新闻法,本社简略整理我国和其他四个国家:法、德、澳洲和马来西亚相关“反假新闻法”,对比其中的区别: 各国“假消息法”类型 《2019年防止网络假消息与网络操纵法案》 2019年4月1日在国会一读 2018年,出台第2018-1202法令和2018-1201组织性法案,打击信息操纵 2018年出台《社交网络强制法》(Netzwerk-durchsetzung-sgesetz,简称NetzDG) 澳洲国会于本月4日通过《分享重大暴力内容》刑法典修正案(Criminal Code Amendment…

Clinging to the Noose – Is Singapore getting left behind?

Kirsten Han / Out of all the countries in South-east Asia, only…

黄循财称将抽样检测污水 鉴定某特定族群是否患病

国家发展部长兼财政部第二部长黄循财,今晚(9日)透过电视和网络平台,发表“与冠病共存”演说。 他谈及我国除了传统的拭子测试,也将从污水抽样检测,以鉴定某个特定族群中是否有人患病,例如宿舍客工。 他也声称,客工宿舍已是过去10年来不断改善的成果,但即使已采取防范措施,疫情还是在宿舍里大爆发。为了防止类似情况再次发生,他表示未来将建设比较能避免传染病扩散的新宿舍。 但他仍辩称,只要大量客工住在一起共用设施,风险仍存在。不论客工宿舍、疗养院或邮轮,一旦爆发传染病都有风险。 “建筑业要做出调整,意味着将由大笔额外开销,眼下政府将通过坚毅向前预算案,来帮忙承担这些费用。” 政府也透过血清或抗体测试,找出曾受过感染但可能已痊愈的人。 他指出今年4月初,我国每天进行2000次检测,迄今已能提高到每天约1万3000次。 预计6月底进入解封第二阶段 此外,黄循财也表示,我国无法永远保持封闭状态,需衡量和保障国人的生命和生计。未来几周政府将继续观察情况,若情况良好,可能在6月底之前就能进入第二阶段。