The owner of Albenyahya Enterprise, the company that was alleged to have been selling flags related to the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), has denied the allegations of his links to ISIS, which has surfaced online.
An earlier media report indicated that Mr Syed Mohammad Faisal BenYahya, owner of Albenyahya Enterprise, has ordered about 20 flags in July, during the month of Ramadan, and sold them online at S$17 each.
He has also added that the sale was a “one-off thing due to customer requests”.
Mr BenYahya has earlier lodged a police report about the allegations made against him and his company by “an unfortunate post on a website” that link the business and the owners as “supporters of terrorism”, which he has termed “baseless accusations”.
The flag in question is the Black Standard, or more specifically, the black flag of Jihad as sold by Albenyahya Enterprise. The design is a simple black background with the Shahada printed on it, the Arabic translation which reads “There is no god but Allah, Muhammad is the messenger of Allah”.
The most basic translation of “Jihad” is “struggle” or “resisting”, which has both violent (e.g. holy war) and non-violent (e.g. self-purification) forms. However, various Muslim armed groups have use the black flags inscribed with the Shahada in white since 2001. Most recently, the flag has been adopted by ISIS.
The police has yet to respond to TOC’s queries about whether they are aware of the sale of the flags, and if it is allowed to be sold in Singapore. TOC has published an earlier report on the incident.
Earlier in August this year, the United Kingdom has called for the arrest of those who display the ISIS flag.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

包括销售商、经理人、律师 10人涉1140万元房产套现诈骗

涉嫌参与三起总额高达850万元的房屋贷款套现(cashback)诈骗案,10人今早遭商业事务局提控上庭。 警方于周一(11月2日)指出,当银行意识到有问题时,这群人还尝试骗取总值290万元的第四次房贷套现。 十名被告中有两名产业销售商、两名房屋经纪人、两名买家、一名产业转让律师和三名中间人。 调查显示,案件发生于2014年至2015年期间。 警方指出,产业销售商和代理人在确定了房屋售价后,在向银行申请贷款时抬高售价,将所获得的超额贷款分配给其他的合作者。 申请过程中,代理人还招募了中间人和买家购屋,并在提交贷款申请时提供伪造收入文件。 在两年期间,被告成功获得总值为851万8000元的三笔贷款套现,他们还在进行着第四次,总值为290万元的诈骗行为,使得贷款总额达到1139万8000元。 警方指出,当一名中间人拖欠贷款时,银行变得谨慎了,随后也以亏损超过290万元的价格出售三个房产。 今天,三名诈骗案主脑被控欺诈和伪造文件罪,其中一人面对其他七项和刑事犯罪有关的指控,包括刑事违反信托罪以及伪造印花税证书。 两名中间人被控诈骗,两名买家则被控执行转让契据,而经纪人则被控与他人串通,欺诈执行转让契据。 根据刑事法典,诈骗首脑、中间人、卖家和经纪人若罪成,或面对监刑、罚款,或两者兼施。 根据《印花税法令》,其中一名首脑将因为使用伪造印花税证件,而被起诉,罪成可被罚款不超过一万元,或三年的监刑,或两者兼施。…

Chinese couple tried to kidnap child in Chinatown: magazine

Magazine, The Asian Parent (Singapore edition], reported on Thursday an alleged attempt…

总编辑的话

总编辑的话(译自英语站): 你好,我是许渊臣。对于那些指责《网络公民》只呈现有关政府的“负面报导”,而不是施政的积极面,我谨以下列事项说明: 一,官方从未邀请《网络公民》出席任何官方记者会,且文告声明只传给主流媒体,这也致使我们必须“重新报导”已透过主流媒体出街的政府“好事”。 二,以新加坡报业控股(SPH)为例,本社在2018财年的营收仅为10万4千新元(包括捐款),反观报业控股媒体部的营收高达六亿9千万元。 这相当于1对6600的比例。 本社在2018财年,加上英语和中文网站也只有八位职员,但报业控股所有业务的职员总数多达4千678人。 本社有约100位每年缴付100元订费的订户。此外,在2018年来自捐款的收入占20巴仙。经营一个批判政府的网页,也意味着难以奢求可得到价值数万元的广告。 我想在这里阐明的一点是,比起主流媒体,《网络公民》即便收入和资源有限,为何本社还要涵盖那些主流媒体已作过的报导? 难道只是为了看起来中立,但因为需要额外资源做报导,而让本社濒临拮据?更甭说那些要求中立者未曾作出支持举动。 经营《网络公民》,也让我体会到国内反对党面对的困难。尽管许多公民都抱怨反对党和他们的候选人看起来毫无准备且无远见,但与此同时,他们很少(如果有的话)反思,在这不平等的棋局中,他们可以作出的努力。 在打造更佳民主环境的进程中,当执政党持续对独立媒体如《网络公民》和反对党制造障碍,公民的思维却是最难克服的部分。 对于有意透过捐款支持本社的善长仁翁,您可以透过以下户口进行转账:…

Three Singaporeans and one PR, victims in fatal accident in Johor

A bus fell off into a six-metre-deep ravine at KM137 of the…