By Howard Lee
More than 1,200 people have requested to be included as members of the Pioneer Generation, as they did not satisfy the requirements to qualify for the related benefits.
The Pioneer Generation Package (PGP) website states the qualifying conditions – citizens need to be born on or before 31 Dec 1949 (i.e. 65 years and above from 1 Jan 2014) and have received their citizenship by 31 Dec 1986.
Media reports indicated that of the 1,200 applicants, half did not meet the age requirement, and the other half the citizenship requirement.
Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam first announced in February this year that a panel will be set up to assess appeals, on a case-by-case basis, for inclusion in the Pioneer Generation, “as there may be individuals who marginally miss out but have “good claims to be counted among the Pioneer Generation””.
However, Member of Parliament Tin Pei Ling has urged the appeals panel to clarify the principles and conditions of the review process. “I think that will give more confidence, and will also help to reduce potential confusion over who is or isn’t eligible for it, and who can or cannot enjoy the benefits from this package,” she was reported as saying.
According to Senior Minister of State for Finance and Transport Josephine Teo, the panel comprises government officials and community leaders from various groups. It is not clear if they constitute grassroot leaders in constituencies.
Ms Teo also said in July this year that the panel was “in the process of working out the approach to take when assessing appeals” and that “more will be shared in due course”.
To date, no clarification has been made on how the panel assess appeals, and what criteria is used for evaluation.
Media reports have also indicated that the panel will give “more consideration… to those assessed to have contributed to the nation.” The conditions for such contributions were not defined.
Results of the appeals are expected to be out by September at the earliest.
The lack of clarity has earlier led some MPs to give their own views on the assessment process and who has such “good claims to be counted among the Pioneer Generation”.
According to media reports, “MPs, who have fanned out to spread the news and details of the package to their constituents in recent days, said those who appeal based on citizenship criteria might stand a higher likelihood of success.”
Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC MP Zainal Sapari was also of the view that the age criteria was not a good assessment method. “If you give allowance to those that miss by one day, then what about those who missed by two days?” He had indicated a preference for the government to “draw the line and stick to it”.
Announced as part of Budget 2014, the PGP has a total value of S$8 billion, and was meant to recognise the nation-building contributions of first-generation Singaporeans.
This is done by providing Medisave top-ups, subsidies for the new MediShield Life insurance scheme, and subsidies for outpatient treatment.
In addition, those aged 55 and above this year who do not qualify for the PGP will receive Medisave top-ups of about S$100 to S$200 a year over the next five years.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Minister K Shanmugam challenges Lee Hsien Yang to have a lawyer to write to him for his response

In yet another episode in the ongoing Lee family saga, Minister of…

匿名账户指本地现死亡病例 新加坡报业控股期刊遵守更正指示

由于有匿名账号散播假消息,指我国出现武汉肺炎死亡病例,新加坡报业控股期刊旗下的HardwareZone论坛,同意遵守卫生部发出的更正指示。 本月26日,HardwareZone论坛出现匿名账号,指我国出现新型冠状病毒(武汉肺炎)的死亡病例,一名66岁男子病逝。 对此卫生部长颜金勇在隔日(27日),指示防止网络假消息和网络操纵办事处,给新加坡报业控股期刊发出“广泛性更正指示”,要求对有关消息发布更正指示。 政府网站Factually亦驳斥有关说法,指截至当晚11时都未出现确诊病例死亡案例。 至于报业控股期刊总裁黄桂欢则发声明表示,在接到有关更正指示后就立即删除有关贴文,并发布更正声明。 通讯及新闻部长易华仁昨早在跨部门工作小组的记者会上, 也指该贴文发布后两个半小时,有多达4600访客看过,“这类消息可能造成恐慌,所以需援引法令,在必要时毫不犹豫用以来对付散播假新闻者,”

因“少了父亲”不能参加母亲节促销 网友怒斥 餐厅道歉

一名网友带着母亲想参加母亲节促销活动,却因为“家庭不完整”、“少了父亲”,所以单亲妈妈不能获得促销,她直接说道,这太说不过去了。 网友Mellissa Seah于6月5日晚上10时28分,在脸书上分享了一篇有关其和家人所面对的“不公平待遇”。 她指出,她当时带着母亲等人,在樟宜机场等待登机前,决定到机场内的曼哈顿鱼市场餐馆(Manhattan Fish Market,简称MFM)用餐。当时因为已经过了用餐时间,而且人潮不多,所以他们不用排队就能入座。 他们当时就在该餐馆外看到一个母亲节的促销活动,活动横幅上写道“和母亲来个约会,她只想要和家人的一顿饭”。网友当时来了兴趣,能为母亲提供免费的炸鱼薯片,何乐而不为,就询问了有关的促销活动。 但是令他们感到不可思议的是,工作人员当时回应说她们并不符合参与资格,“因为你们的家庭不完整”。 当时员工的回应,“缺少了父亲” ,令网友感到无言以对,现场陷入尴尬的沉默中,基本上没人知道要作何回应。 Mellissa指出,她当时并没有针对工作人员,因为她认为工作人员的回应,很有可能都是来自上层的指示。 最糟糕的失败行销…

【工人党市镇会诉讼】AHTC代表律师申请修改诉状

尽管高庭已在去年10月11日作出判决,不过阿裕尼后港市镇会代表律师,向法庭申请修改针对工人党毕丹星和其他四人的诉状内容。相信此举是为了实际反映去年法官作出的判决。 上述举动被视作较为罕见。在去年的判决,高庭法官加南拉美斯(Kannan Ramesh)指出,刘程强和林瑞莲等人,需为市镇会损失负起法律责任。毕丹星雇用市镇会前管理代理公司FM Solutions and Services(FMSS),涉违反技术与审慎义务(duty of skill and care)。 不过,判词不认为毕丹星等人有违AHTC的信托义务。后者已选择上诉,由五司坐镇的上诉庭,将在本月受理上诉案件。 市镇会代表律师Shook…