The Online Citizen

Over S$35 billion of injections from Govt to Temasek but no CPF monies?

Over S$35 billion of injections from Govt to Temasek but no CPF monies?
July 11
12:43 2014

By S Y Lee and Leong Sze Hian

We now know exactly where the $5 billion injection into Temasek Holdings came from, if we were to read the various media reports on the sources of the $5 billion capital injection from the Government into Temasek Holdings.

Temasek Holdings had disclosed on Tuesday that it received a $5 billion capital injection from the Ministry of Finance (MOF) during its latest financial year ended March 31. It is also shared that in the past 10 years, the Government has injected capital into Temasek a few more times.

The Ministry, which is Temasek Holdings’ sole shareholder, said that the capital injection did not include proceeds from the Special Singapore Government Securities (SSGS), which are instruments that the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board uses to invest Singaporeans’ CPF savings.

According to a spokesperson from MOF, it is said that Temasek Holdings does not manage any CPF monies.

It is understood that this is the first time that we have disclosure as to where exactly the capital injection into Temasek Holdings came from.

But if this is the case – why?

Transparency sometimes only?

So in the past 10 years, the Government has injected capital into Temasek Holdings a few times. In Temasek Holdings’ 2007-2008 financial year, the MOF pumped $10 billion into the company and in 2011, the Government put in a further undisclosed amount to fund the joint venture between Temasek and Malaysian state investment firm Khazanah Nasional.

Why is it that we have partial transparency? At times, we have announcements that state the sum of the capital injections made by the government, while at other times this figure is not stated.

Also, did any of the capital injections from the past say exactly where the money came from? The latest clarification by MOF stated that the $5 billion injection did not come from proceeds of the SSGS, proceeds from government land sales in Singapore, government budget surpluses, and proceeds from SGS? Do we get this clarification only because there is renewed public interest in CPF funds?

In addition, how do we know for sure that Temasek Holdings’ capital injections before the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC) was  formed, never did come from CPF funds since Temasek Holdings started about 7 years before the GIC was formed?

CPF funds were first co-mingled with the rest of Government’s funds?

According to Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the Government pools the proceeds from SSGS issuance with the rest of the Government’s funds, such as proceeds from the tradable Singapore Government Securities (SGS), any government surpluses as well as the proceeds from land sales.

He said that the commingled funds are first deposited with the Monetary Authority of Singapore MAS as Government deposits. MAS converts these funds into foreign assets through the foreign exchange market. However, a major portion of these assets are of a longer term nature, and are hence transferred over to be managed by GIC.

More than $35b injections into Temasek – You sure none from CPF funds?

Although the reports state that the SSGS proceeds are not passed to Temasek Holdings for management and it manages its own assets which do not contain any CPF monies, Temasek Holdings pools its assets with the rest of the Government’s funds. So, how do we know for sure, especially in the early years, as to whether the Government’s injections into Temasek Holdings do include CPF funds?  To date, a total of $35 billion plus an undisclosed sum in 2011 were pumped into the investment vessel.

And finally, why did it take 49 years for Singaporeans to be told exactly where their CPF funds have gone to, and was managed by whom?

  • PikuChoo

    The question we need to ask is: “Did Mr Tharman disclose ANYTHING controversial?” Was anything revealed by him in parliament worthy of being kept a secret by the government all these years?

    If not, then Mr Tharman either has yet to tell us everything we should/need to know or he is lying.

    • GUSSIE91

      It is hard to judge the secrecy of hidden dark CPF money transfer, unless there is a change in the next GE 2016 to reveal the truth of our retirement money………under the powerful single party.

      • jessie

        We have empowered them so we must remove the power !

        • GUSSIE91

          yup……….we should vote wisely for Singaporeans to have balance of power to enable all Singaporeans to be treated fairly and also are well aware of their CPF only retirement funds to survive.

  • GUSSIE91

    Reading the latest on line feed back, the critic to the govt handling CPF is just getting from bad to the worst…………it may reach the peak prior GE 2016 and that is govt fatal mistake trying to out smart clever Singaporeans.

    • liangjwc1

      But someone without brain said thrust TH very much so no need to ask!

      • GUSSIE91

        but not w/1,5% return……………..that is an insult and head must roll.

        • liangjwc1

          Even with 0,5% return that someone special will also say no need to ask.
          Seems like he is very well known on this forum.

          • GUSSIE91

            yup……………there are loser in this forum and they should edit their postings.

  • jessie

    It seems like they want to separate Temasek Holdings from the CPF funds so that Ho Ching will not be held accountable by the Public. Why do we need to have Temasek Holdings when we have the GICs headed by her husband?

    • GUSSIE91

      They should be aware about CPF non transparency in addition of Roy’s case, all Singaporeans is watching very very closely……………..wrongly steps, it will be very costly for the govt.

  • GUSSIE91

    Govt may have a good intention to protect Singaporeans wealth indeed, the problems are they just keeping it within their own small group of ‘top Singapore scholars’ who think that they control and own Singaporeans entire life and are thinking too smart to make fatal mistakes.

    Those ‘overly confidence attitude’ has destroyed their trust to all Singaporeans after losing more than $55billions and still keeping stubbornly secret till to day.

    Public money still belongs to the public legally, the ruling part does not own our fund, of course they also must inform the public fairly either the fund is losing or gaining profits…………….nothing wrong for all Singaporeans to know their future funds like other OCED countries, it is their full right to know.

    Continue to refrain and being defensive will cost the ruling party dearly by losing more and more vote in the next GE 2016, it is up the powerful current leader to disclose and to listen more to all Singaporeans…………of course, please stop suing the ordinary average Singaporeans and lets move on to excel into the next higher level ‘together’.