PM Lee (PIc: CNA)
PM Lee (PIc: CNA)
PM Lee (PIc: CNA)
After creating controversy last month by describing some Singaporeans as “a disgrace to Singapore” for threatening the organisers of a Philippines Independence Day celebration, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has once again caused blood pressure to rise among some citizens.
At a grassroots event in Ang Mo Kio on Sunday to celebrate the Indian New Year, Mr Lee was reported to have said that “the event was an embodiment of the theme as well as on a larger scale where everyone participates as one big Singapore family” and that Singapore was a place “where we all celebrate one another’s festivals and happy events together.”
He added that “Singapore belongs to all of us”, which he said included “Singaporeans, new arrivals, people who are on permanent residence here, people who are on employment pass here.”
Mr Lee’s comments were reported by Channel Newsasia:
cna
Mr Lee’s remarks, which were first reported by the media in India, raised howls of protest from some online who see his comments as unacceptable.
“How can a PR or Employment Pass Holder be equal to a citizen?” one person posted on The Online Citizen’s Facebook page. “This is truly a slap to every Singapore-born son who has given two years of his life to national service. For a leader to say that this country belongs to people who don’t hold a Singapore citizenship is absolutely shocking.”
“We the citizens of Singapore have just been reduced to the status of guests in our own country by our own PM,” said Steve Chia.
“How can a country belongs to everybody who happens to live here?” asked David Tan Hock San.
Janet Ng said Mr Lee has “forgotten [why] our forefathers fought so hard for Singapore ann those who have sacrificed their lives for Singapore.”
“Singapore is for Singaporeans,” she said. “Those who are PRs (Permanent Residents) or working with WP (Work Permit), SP (Special Pass) are just visitors of Singapore who only help the economy [of] Singapore. Only when you are a citizen of Singapore… can say Singapore is for you. We have to draw the line even though you don’t like it. Very sad to hear this from our leader.”
Kevinn Heng said, “As a citizen [I] am most sad to see this statement. We welcome guests but that does not equate to them having an ownership of our land and what we have built.”
Many said that since Mr Lee says Singapore belongs to everyone who is here, foreigners should then be asked to do National Service (NS), which has become a sticking point among Singaporeans since Mr Lee’s government opened the floodgates to 2 million foreigners.
Foreigners presently make up 40 per cent of Singapore’s total population of 5.4m, which is expected to increase further to 6.9m by 2030.
While first generation PRs are not required to do NS, their sons will have to. Still, the call for the former to be conscripted in the military has been an ongoing on.
It prompted Mr Lee, who was a Brigadier General before entering politics in 1984, to make another controversial remark in 2009:
“If we make it (NS and Reservist for PR) a requirement, we would not get the people we wanted,” he said.
“Secondly, if they did serve NS at 30, 40 and 50 years old. I would not like to be their platoon commander.”
His remarks prompted one blogger to write:
“[To] belittle the contributions and sacrifices of thousands of NSmen who serve till 40 is appallingly sick! It is so sad to know that Singapore citizens who recite the Singapore Aspiration (Pledge?) are lesser mortals in Singapore than PRs who spice up the lives of elite Singaporeans!”
[Read here: “Ungrateful platoon commander, insensitive leeder”]
TODAY report, 2009
TODAY report, 2009
Former presidential candidate, Tan Kin Lian, has also castigated Mr Lee for his latest views.
“The remark by PM Lee that Singapore belongs to everyone staying here, including the foreigners on work asses, makes a mockery of asking male citizens to serve National Service,” Mr Tan said. “It is ridiculous to have this person as the prime minister.”
Blogger Ng E Jay said Mr Lee “urgently needs to clarify his highly controversial remark.”
“Netizens have reacted strongly to Mr Lee’s statements, which seem to have been interpreted in a highly negative fashion,” Mr Ng said. “Given the different interpretations and the angry reactions of many netizens, I urgently call upon PM Lee to clarify. Just what do you mean?”

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

评论:投给行动党的十大好理由

译自:Augustine Low评论 以下是在来届大选,投票给人民行动党的10大好理由: 一)国会不太需要社交距离– 因为大部分时候国会都人烟稀少,行动党议员都有要事在忙 二)消费税尽可能尽早上调 三)某些人的薪资永远是“国家机密” 四)自己监督自己的世界级概念 五)老王卖瓜,自卖自夸–另一个全球第一流概念 六)有机会聆听有关我们国父们如何打败共产党、争取独立的感人故事   七)聆听我们立国一代和建国一代建设国家的牺牲血泪史…

Think Centre's Labour Day Message

~ By Think Centre ~ This Labour Day, Think Centre salutes all…

Certis APO kicking PMD rider; LTA says that it does not condone any behaviour that deviates from the established rules of engagement

Commenting on the incident where a Certis Cisco Auxillary Police Officer kicked…

网购进口女童性玩偶 留澳大学生面控

丢脸丢到国外去!一名在澳大利亚留学的26岁我国男子,因为进口貌似女童的性爱玩具,在珀斯法院面控。 26岁的我国男子在澳大利亚留学,之前订购了一个自中国进口的硅树脂玩偶,被海关官员于圣诞节前夕,在航空货运站截获,并于周四(9日)将男子逮捕。 澳大利亚边境执法局(Australian Border Force)在文告中指出,相关的包裹在经过扫描时,发现内部装着一个类似女孩的硅胶玩偶。 因此他们将男子逮捕,并指控他进口该性玩偶。 虽然男子获得有条件保释,但是他必须于1月17日重返珀斯地方法庭。 在澳洲,拥儿童色情材料属违法 一旦进口涉儿童色情材料的罪名成立,男子将被判入狱不超过10年,或罚款不超过52万5000澳元(约48万6500新元),或两者兼施。 澳洲边境执法局官员指出,边防部队人员截获越来越多的类似进口性玩偶,类似玩偶也成为一种新兴的儿童色情材料。 “用于情趣用途、模拟18岁以下儿童制造的玩偶,被归类为不良商品,因此被我国禁止入口。” 他补充说,处理虐待儿童材料也是该部队的重点行动之一。…