tchfbpost
Following the debacle over Member of Parliament (MP) Baey Yam Keng’s posting about having paid S$3.00 for a meal of nasi padang and a cup of bandung in December, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean is being questioned about his Facebook posting about a S$1.80 chicken rice.
On 29 March, Mr Teo posted the following on his Facebook page [you can still see it here].
The posting seemed to have originated from a member of his grassroots’ Facebook page belonging to one Ng Cher Pheng:
Ngcherpheng
Mr Teo had added in the location of the stall – Pasir Ris – which sold the meal at that price.
Mr Teo is one of the MPs for Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC.
Following his posting, some started to question if it was true – that the chicken rice meal costs only S$1.80, reminiscent of the doubts over Mr Baey’s claim over the nasi padang meal.
Website TR Emeritus (TRE) decided to investigate and visited the stall on Monday, 31 March. [Read the report here: “A sad story behind $1.80 chicken rice in DPM’s GRC”.] It reported that it was true that the chicken rice meal costs S$1.80. However, this was a “promotional price”, something which both Mr Teo and Mr Ng did not mention in both of their Facebook postings.
TRE took a photo of the banner at the stall announcing the promotion:
promotional
Moreover, the hawker told TRE that he had actually been running his business in Tampines Central previously but had to move to Pasir Ris because of the high rental.
“[Because] of the ridiculous rental which keeps increasing at Tampines,” TRE says, “he had no choice but to close shop and move to Pasir Ris.”
TRE reports:

“At the moment, the rental of his stall at Blk 446 is still manageable.
“However, he is concerned for his business. He told TRE, “This is lunch time now and you can see how big the crowd is.” Indeed, although there were people buying his chicken rice, the crowd was not that great despite the promotional price of $1.80 a plate.
“When asked how long he is going to keep his chicken rice promotion going, he sighed, “See lah”.”

TRE criticised Mr Teo and Mr Ng for not being “close to the ground” and for not ascertaining the facts of the matter before making those postings online.

“Rather than trying to score political points by touting cheap food in his constituency, DPM Teo should go and talk to the hawker to find out if there is any story behind it. This is what it means to “stay close to the ground”. If he is too busy, he should dispatch his grassroots.
“But then again, his own grassroots leader, Ng Cher Pheng, instead of finding out more about the story behind the $1.80 promotional price, quickly put up a Facebook message, “Lunch only $1.80 @Blk446“, to inform DPM Teo about it without mentioning that it is a promotional price in the message.”

In Mr Baey’s case, he had explained – after his posting has caused a furore – that a “staff had recognised me that day and out of respect for my work and service in the community, charged me only $3 when it was more than $4.”
Still, many were not convinced and continued to question why he did not originally seem to know that such a meal would not cost S$2.50.
byk
The two episodes, however, have thrown up a deeper issue which has come to the fore in recent weeks – how high rental for food outlets are forcing stalls to close.
While the Pasir Ris chicken rice stall is trudging on, Mr Baey will no longer be able to eat at the nasi padang stall. It has since closed down due to high rental, reported the press.
nasipadangclose
Ironically, in December, while Mr Baey was posting about how cheap a meal of nasi padang was, foodcourt chain Banquet was reported to be closing down. Part of the reason was high commercial rents.
Insing reported:

“Commercial rents have largely risen across the board, and especially within shopping malls, and even more so for food-related businesses. 
“When your lease is due for renewal and the mall landlord decides to squeeze you for more, how many more bowls of fishball noodles do you have to sell to cover that increase?
“If even a large foodcourt operator such as Banquet struggles to manage these costs, what chance do small independent F&B businesses have?”

In March, the famous nasi padang restaurant at Zion Road, River Valley, announced that it will be closing down on 28 March 2014. Again, one of the reasons cited by the owner was high rental.
“The landlord said that he can ask me to leave with just three months’ notice,” the restaurant owner said. “So maybe he has a better deal with other people.”
He disclosed that the landlord had raised his rental by S$1,000 – to $11,000 a month. [See report here.] nasipadang famous
Even the Hai Bin Bishan Prawning business was compelled to close due to the high rent imposed by its landlord, Nature Park, as TOC reported in September. [See report here.] Its rental was being hiked by 300 per cent:
hbprawn

TOC reported: “Mr Wang Huiqing, the person in charge at the Bishan branch, said that the landlord gave an offer of $110,000 to renew the rental of the shop inclusive of the coffeeshop just beside it. Previously, the rental of the whole site which includes the prawning pond and the coffeeshop, was charged a monthly rental of $43,000.”

Thus, the bigger issue here from all these stories – including those of the Pasir Ris chicken rice stall and the closure of the “S$2.50” nasi padang stall – is how rentals are killing the small businesses, and this is what Mr Teo, Mr Baey and Mr Ng should be more concerned about.
How many other small businesses are struggling silently just to keep their heads above water?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

【突发】林鼎今早突被捕 代表律师抗议逮捕不公

人民之声党领袖林鼎律师,今早在位于珍珠大厦的办公处,为下周梁实轩对总理诽谤诉讼案做准备。不料在11时许,有三名商业事务局警员到场,将林鼎逮捕返警局协助调查。 本地维权律师拉维(M Ravi)在脸书更新信息,表示将充任林鼎的辩护律师。他表示,林鼎在被戴上手铐时一度抗议,并指这是有政治动机的逮捕。 目击者称,警方逮捕林鼎,相信和后者未如期出席一项与警方约谈有关,即使林鼎的律师早前已致函警方知会此事。 林鼎请拉维发出简短声明,并指有关调查事项,早已交民事法庭审理,拉维已致函警方,要求警方尊重法庭程序,并强调有关逮捕乃是非法的。 基于其中一项“刑事失信”(Criminal Breach of Trust)指控目前仍在法庭聆讯过程,林鼎不便对此发言。另一项指控则涉及骚扰前职员。 林鼎也代表时评人梁实轩,在总理的诽谤诉讼中辩护,有关诉讼原定下周(6日至10日)在法庭公堂聆审。

Power, change and leadership succession

PAP’s succession mechanism is not necessarily Singapore’s succession mechanism. Ho Rui An

Three new members appointed to respective boards of SMRT Trains Ltd

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) Trains Ltd announced its three new members…

金管局:没操纵汇率

对于美国财政部把新加坡并列入汇率操纵观察名单,我国金融管理局在今日发文告表示,并未操纵其货币以获得出口优势。 金管局在文告中解释,我国金融政策框架以汇率为中心,旨在确保中期物价的稳定,不会也不能通过汇率来取得出口优势和经常账目盈余。 “诚如美国财政部报告所言,金管局在政策范围内,管理新加坡元的名义有效汇率 (S$NEER,即一国对各贸易伙伴国名义汇率,加权平均后的汇率指数),如同他国央行通过定位利率来实施货币政策一样。” “无论是针对汇率或利率,央行首要任务,都是把消费者物价通胀维持低点和平稳。” 金管局也解释,如果刻意削弱新元,将导致通膨急窜,从而影响该局稳定价格的目标。 金管局也认为,我国的经常账户盈余( current account balance )也要视情况来分析。在我国发展早期,即1965-1984年间,经常账户赤字平均接近GDP的10巴仙,投资需求大于储蓄。随着经济成熟,投资需求逐渐减少,故此国家储备也就增加,这使得经常账户有盈余。 金管局评估富裕程度提高将增加消费,而随着公共和私人储备用于应付人口老龄化的需求,我国经常账户盈余将随之减少。