Posters at City Hall MRT station pair a pet and a farmed animal, and ask commuters, “Why Love One But Eat the Other?”
Passengers boarding and alighting from trains at City Hall MRT station can look forward to thought provoking posters on all 96 of the interchange station’s train doors. From 27 March to 9 April, 2014, the posters will encourage riders to question their meat eating habit.
The basic structure of each of the three different posters consists of a large photo pairing two animals: one whom we care for as a pet and the other whom we eat as food. The three pairs are: puppy and calf, kitten and chick, and puppy and piglet. Above the photos is the question: Why Love One But Eat The Other?
The campaign is being run by Vegetarian Society (Singapore), a local charity founded in 1999 and devoted to reducing meat consumption. VSS President Clarence Tan explained, “This campaign originally ran on the subways in Toronto, Canada. We saw the impact that the posters had there, and we are confident that also here in Singapore, the posters’ message will encourage people to examine their own eating habits”.
VSS Treasurer, Heng Guan Hou, described the fund raising necessary to pay the almost $50,000 for the posters’ two-week run. “We began raising funds in late 2013, and last week we finally met our target, thanks to donations from hundreds of people”.
Ashley Chow, the VSS Education Officer, explained the thinking behind the posters, “People in Singapore do care about animals. We see this, for example, in the love people lavish on their pets and in the government’s tougher measures to combat abuse of animals”.

One of the more interesting occurrences in the lead up to the campaign launch was when SMRT, at the behest of LTA, requested the removal of photos showing the horrors that farmed animals endure on factory farms. In the end, we reached a compromise; the potentially discomforting photos were covered, with an explanation, “Censored: These photos were deemed too graphic and may upset the public. For the full posters, please visit www.loveustoo.sg”.VSS Communications Officer, Ganga Sudhan, stated, “We sincerely appreciate the willingness of LTA and SMRT to reach a constructive compromise on this matter”.

Support for the poster campaign has come from many individuals and organisations. Dr Ho Soon Lye, MD, addressed the issue of whether meat eating is necessary for health, “Vegetarians can easily stay healthy on a daily vegetarian diet of carbohydrate, fat, protein, vitamins and minerals, which can be easily obtained from our local markets or from neighbourhood vegetarian food-stalls or restaurants. In general, throughout their lives, committed vegetarians tend to have less health events and live longer life-spans with quieter, happier and more contented lives”.
Louis Ng, Chief Executive of ACRES, a local organisation well known for its defence of wild animals, stated, “ACRES wholeheartedly supports this important campaign which will highlight the plight of farm animals. If animals don’t have a say in their treatment, then it is up to all caring human beings to give them a voice, speak up on their behalf and end the cruelty. We hope that more people will support this campaign and join us in fostering compassion and respect for all animals.”
Another animal welfare leader, Veron Lau, President of Cat Welfare Society, added, “Loving our pets yet eating animals does often pose a dilemma for many animal lovers. We ask ourselves if we cared to save and prevent one from suffering, should we not do the same for the other. Whether we are animal lovers or not, we should make it a priority to live mindfully and that includes thinking about where our food or pets come from because we are part of a consuming chain and have the collective power to affect ethical change through our choices.”
Last, but not least, Ann Lek, Education Officer at the SPCA, stated “’Why love one but eat the other?’ It’s thought-provoking, and gets us thinking about the love we have for our companion animals. Many of us are passionate about helping our canine and feline friends. How can we extend that care and compassion to farm animals? Go vegetarian or eat less meat? Be conscious of how that animal got onto your plate. The choice is in your hands.”
Watch a video explaining the campaign:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Atrocious state of playground in Tampines irks letter writer

A letter sent to the website, Redwire, has highlighted the appalling state…

You are the people’s servants, please remember this

Adrian Ng I had mixed feelings as I looked at the results…

National Climate Change Secretariat seeks public feedback on Singapore's long-term low carbon emissions strategy

The National Climate Change Secretariat (NCCS) has launched an online public consultation…

当善行不再具感染力

原文:私人辅导师James Leong 根据日行一善理事会(SKM)民调,每四位青年中就有一位因为害臊尴尬,而不敢在大庭广众面前表达善意。这个介于15岁-24岁的青年群体,会认为伸出援手的行为一旦被社交媒体广传,会令他们看起来相当愚蠢,或担心被别人嘲笑。 我可以预见可能网民会指责这些青年,行善理应无私怎么还要在意自己;又或者也指责那些被帮助的人也太过固执或自以为是。 你看,我们新加坡人非常喜欢数字,因为量化的数字能慰籍我们对不稳定和“怕输”心态的焦虑。甚至于乎它是毋庸置疑的、能起到左右制定政策的作用。 所以,即便日行一善理事会感觉良好的民调也会引起些许不适,是很正常的,之后就有责难、然后还要发展出我们的一套理论,来让情况合理化。 我也是感到难辞其咎的人之一。我在翻阅该篇研究时发现了研究中的漏洞。为什么问卷内并不含族群的选项?研究对象的家庭入息呢?研究对象的教育程度又如何?我顶着这些疑问,甚至寄信到日行一善秘书长Dr William Wan要求他为此提供解释,因为这很可能表示社会上隐性阶层分裂的现象。 我想,这些遗失的信息,或许能揭示在帮助较不幸者时感到的羞愧,其实是因为我们对自身享有的优势感到不适。 两日后我看见一件简单但具震撼的事情,或许此刻所有的调查结果、辅导理论或经济社会现象看似多余。 那是一个周三下午,当天天气恶劣,我看见一个老人在惹兰勿刹上行走,他手上并没有任何雨具。他为了不被雨淋湿,步履蹒跚往熟食中心前去,走在他身边是一名东南亚外籍客工,他一手撑伞一手拿着施工材料。老人向他点点头,而工人本能地就和老人一起共用雨伞,直到他们到达遮雨棚下才各自散开。…