By Yasmeen Banu
In recent weeks, the LGBT (Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender) topic has sparked numerous controversial comments, from pastors to academic scholars, since Health Promotion Board braved same-sex relationship questions.
Much recently however, besides Lawrence Khong, Associate Professor Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied created a whirlwind of concerned, angry, and for the most part, upset students over his views on lesbianism.
On the 20th of February, Associate Professor Khairudin made a post on Facebook answering a question about liberal Islam and its support for lesbianism.
The Associate Professor at National University of Singapore (NUS) condemned the movement and although he had reasonable suggestions to discourage such behaviours, the tone in which the reply was made was perceived as outwardly strong and untactful.
Amongst his recommendations of “winning the heart of the misled youths”, Associate Professor Khairudin suggested using the power of technology and involving parents and school teachers to detect early signs of “waywardness from their children and students”.
He end his post by likening lesbians to “cancers” and using the term “social diseases” in his reply sparked concern, especially from NUS.
Two current NUS students and a former student lodged a complaint soon after seeing the post on the professor’s Facebook page, claiming that he had described “alternative modes of sexual orientation” as “wayward”, and as “cancers” and “social diseases” to be “cleansed”.
A petition for students from NUS was created to express their concerns about Professor Khairudin who “recently authored two Facebook posts (“Liberal Islam, Lesbianism and the likes of it” and “When Liberals Become Oppressive”) that display a trenchant hostility towards sexual minorities” and which “we believe is unbecoming of a university professor.”
The second post was removed and Associate Professor Khairudin subsequently did multiple edits to his other post and removed the alleged offensive terms towards lesbianism such as “cancers”, and “social diseases” amongst others that the students pointed out.
On the 5th of March, NUS provost Tan Eng Chye said Professor Khairudin acknowledges “poor judgement” in his posts on sexuality, and that his comments “on his views of lesbianism ‘contained provocative, inappropriate and offensive language'”.
“I have counselled Associate Professor Khairudin, who has acknowledged that whilst his only intention had been to convey his point of view, his original posts reflected poor judgement in the tone and choice of words. He has since amended or removed these posts,” said Professor Tan.
He added that “both staff and students of NUS were reminded to “show restraint, due care and respect with their words and actions, particularly when communicating online.”
Associate Professor Khairudin took the opportunity to make clear his views on his Facebook page, stating, that “while the media has provided coverage for the LGBT supporters, so far, little coverage has been provided to those that are not for LGBT.”
He continued to say that his post “Liberal Islam, Lesbianism and the likes of it” is still on his page, though it has been altered, and the change was done “in view of the sensitivities on the ground which I am fully aware of.”
His position as a Muslim about LGBT “remains clear and is in line with the view of Muslims scholars such as the one made by PERGAS.” He maintains that there is “no disagreement in Islam on the prohibition of homosexuality”.
Associate Professor Khairudin added that he “fully subscribe to Islam’s guidance and stand firm that homosexuality is a challenge that needs to be addressed through reasoned dialogue and education.”
While NUS has openly criticised Associate Professor Khairudin’s actions, it remains to be seen if the situation will blow over. Blogger Alex Au has remarked that the Professor’s use of words borders on hate speech. It is not clear is any charges will be raised against the Professor,  although he has removed the offending words from his Facebook post.
Meanwhile, the Fellowship of Muslim Students Association has issues a statement in support of Associate Professor Khairudin, commending him for having the courage to speak his mind as an academic.
A Facebook page set up in support of the Professor has garnered more than 5,000 likes, and a counter-petition has also been created, aimed at the students who started the initial petition against the Professor and demanding that they “withdraw their petition and apologize to Professor Syed Khairuddin, as well as undergo counselling to further understand the issues and challenges confronting the student-teacher community.”
The original petition by the current and former NUS students against Associate Professor Khairudin has since ended. To our knowledge, the students have thus far not made any response to the Professor’s edits to his Facebook post or the statement by NUS.
Image from AsiaOne

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NMP Anthea Ong calls for Govt to provide six months rental relief for public rental households

Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Anthea Ong in Parliament on Friday (5…

梯级窄小 警示线不明 又一老妪巴士站跌伤

巴士站梯级空间窄小,警示线不明,四个月内导致两名老妇人送院。 一名70余岁的老妇于2月11日晚上七时许,在荷兰通道第43座租屋前的巴士站等待巴士。巴士抵埗后,她走下巴士站的梯级,伸脚跨步准备上巴士,却失去平衡跌坐在梯级上,双脚疼的动弹不得。 类似的案件也曾于去年10月28日,在相同的车站发生。 受害者为77岁的老妪,王三妹。她也是在跨足准备登上巴士时失去平衡跌倒,碰伤了头部,送院留医三个月后撒手人寰。 意外非首次发生 老妇11日跌倒后,获得在场的数名路人帮忙,巴士车长也下车帮忙,更拨电召救护车,要把她送到医院去。惟老妇不愿让他人通知其孩子们,怕会打扰孩子作息,更表示不愿去医院,去给中医救治就好了。她说当时只是到荷兰通道逛逛,过后还要去其他地方。 路人看老妇人脚疼得不能站起来,并不赞成让她只去看中医。 救护车抵达后,医护人员就将老妇人送到医院去了。 巴士站需维修符合需要 有关的巴士站并非首次发生耄耋跌倒事件。该巴士站的三个梯级面积窄小,黄色的警示线油漆脱落,常有乘客因为看不清或站不稳而差点跌倒。 在《联合晚报》报道中,资深教育工作者冯焕也指出,位于史各士路(Scotts Road)纽顿地铁站前的巴士站,与联邦道巴士站梯级的设计相似,也有三个梯级。她表示曾经在该巴士站下车时,因为没有看见巴士站的三个梯级,误踩导致失去平衡,差一点跌倒了,过后就再也不敢在那个巴士站上下车了。…

Potong Pasir, the people’s Town

by: Howard Lee and Benjamin Cheah/ You’ve heard it before. The slum…

社论:选项无几的第四代总理接班人

总理李显龙在11日的人民行动党中委会改选和干部大会上,开启第三代交棒第四代领导接班人的行动,资深中委卸任,准备逐步让第四代精英班底接手政权。 然而,李显龙对总理接班人的选项,其实所剩无几。 纵观整个内阁和第四代精英,似乎很难找到民望较高、较具号召力和凝聚力的领袖。 李显龙实则”帐下无人“。面对一手”烂牌“,既要看起来亲民、又具备行政经验,李显龙能够找到的”最佳“人选,似乎就只有陈振声。 即便内政部长尚穆根回应媒体,根据干部大会上的”站位“照片,推断他是副总理只是揣测;但陈振声和尚穆根,站在李显龙身旁,也绝非巧合,其中的潜台词,党内人士心照。 另一个能够透露些潜台词的”站位“照片,就是去年陈振声随李显龙出访中国,乘总理伉俪出席检阅仪式,和同仁们的合照。 当时陈振声还是总理公署部长,站在合照的最中间,双手往后摆,显得格外突出。 而陈振声几乎每年都随团出使中国,频频与中国领导接班人会面。 行动党帐下无人?何不尚达曼? 但也有者质问,是否非得让第四代精英接任下任总理,是否还有其他选项?其中政府投资公司前首席经济师杨南强,就对副总理尚达曼卸任中委感到遗憾。 他认为,尚达曼是现有决策者中,对国家未来50年社会、经济和政治改革和挑战,更有远见和具开放思维的领袖。 他担忧,国家即注重精英、不分种族和唯才是举,但把”新加坡还未准备好又印度人当总理“当作借口,将是国人的悲哀和损失,也否定了大家看到关键改革的机会。…