By Jewel Philemon
hock lee
Days of Rage, or days of one-sided propaganda?
 
It is difficult to disagree with historian Dr Loh Kah Seng when he described the Days of Rage documentary on Channel Newsasia (CNA) as a “sorry excuse [for] a documentary”.
Dr Loh, whose remarks were made on his Facebook page, was referring to the second episode of ‘Days of Rage’ – a documentary mini-series which is part of CNA’s ongoing programming project on Singapore history, aimed to coincide with the 50th anniversary of the nation’s independence.
Bankrolled by a Media Development Authority grant of SGD13 million, the project (which began broadcasting in 2012) aims to produce programmes that “retell history, but in a more modern, engaging way; making use of the archival footage that we have; recreating it; and finding new formats,” especially for the younger generation who have not lived through the historical events that the project covers.
I was first directed to Days of Rage by Dr Loh’s comment which I’d stumbled upon online. Curious to find out what exactly he meant, I watched the episode, featuring the 1955 Hock Lee bus riots, on Channel News Asia’s website.
The bias in this “documentary” is even more glaring than the expression I wore while watching this latest 45-minute exercise in the perennial partiality we’ve come to expect and almost accept from the mainstream media. This conspicuously suggestive documentary is so fastidious in its concern with propagating the story of one party as the whole truth, that it neglects basic journalistic tenets like fairness, accuracy, objectivity, or proportionality – becoming, in the process, a sad piece of substandard journalism that ignores relevant, critical information through omission, conveniently forgetting to ask “why” questions, engaging in false-balancing, and utilizing regressive, misleading, fear-mongering narrative techniques that seem to be employed just to distract audiences into believing the specious theses that are rampant in the film.
What is perhaps most distressing is CNA’s audacity to produce such a slanted documentary and position it as indisputable history. This is why it is important for us to not only repudiate such media but also rebut such work with logical, concrete, legitimate arguments. We need to, as a collective society, take action to critique what we take as truth, unearth the real, often multi-layered, facts, and commit ourselves to spreading this to others – especially the young who will lead us one day.
The Online Citizen will be featuring a critique of this episode of “Days Of Rage” which was focused on the Hock Lee bus riots of 1955. We interviewed 2  historians, Dr Loh and Dr Thum Ping Tjin, for their opinion on the CNA documentary, and Otto Fong, the son of one of the protagonists, Fong Swee Suan.
Dr Loh and Mr Fong were interviewed by CNA for the documentary too.
Here is an excerpt from TOC’s upcoming report. It is a comment from Mr Otto Fong in an interview with us:

“A fair and balanced documentary should provide views from all sides. The government’s view was of course well-represented, the bus company’s view was too. But the unionists’ views were cut out. My father and Lim are not the villains that the official story wants them to be, so where were those views on this documentary?
“The few of my interview that made it on the documentary were more neutral descriptions, which meant views contrary to the official old story were cut out. The representative from Hock Lee was able to present his side of the story: that Hock Lee’s employers would not make profits had they agreed with union demands. So why is my father’s side of the story taken out?”

And in perhaps a sign of the sloppy work by CNA, its promotional blurb on its website said:

“12 May 1955 is also known as ‘Black Friday’ in Singapore’s history.”

In fact, 12 May 1955 was a Thursday – and the riot is thus known as “Black Thursday” [see here and here] and not “Black Friday” as CNA claims.
black friday cna
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

87岁老妇病逝 今年骨痛热症死亡病例增至13人

据本地慈善团体乐于助人(Happy People Helping People Community)在脸书分享,一名87岁老妇王莹(译音)因骨痛热症不幸病逝。她也是该组织的受益人。 这使得本地今年骨痛热症死亡病例增至13人。 截至5月12日,过去一周骨痛热症病例已达895例,超越2014年891起的单周记录。

香港财案 18岁以上港人每人派一万港元

香港财政司司长陈茂波今日宣读财政预算案,在武汉冠状病毒疫情下提出纾困措施,特别是18岁以上港人,每人都能获得1万港元(约1千798新元),预计700万人受惠。 相信上述措施乃鼓励当地人消费,与舒缓港民经济压力。但与此同时,该政府财政年度赤字也将是历年来最高。 陈茂波称,尽管上述发放将涉及大笔公帑,涉及约710亿港元,但乃是为当前特殊情况而设,不会对财政造成长远负担。 至于港府其他纾困措施,还包括宽减2019/20课税年度的薪俸税和个人入息课税;未来五年兴建10玩个公屋单位;向领取社会保障金的人士,发放多一个月的综合社会保障金额等等。 陈茂波预计香港经济今年将面对极大内外挑战,预测今年经济实质增长介乎负1.5至正0.5巴仙之间。 香港特首林郑月娥则认为,上述发放1万元现金措施“合理、有效”,直接给市民“加油”,能即时协同社会携手共济,措施也可以刺激消费,为本地经济注入一定的动力。 根据香港民意研究所最新民调显示,林郑月娥的支持率跌至个位数九巴仙。

Fire in shophouse near Mustafa Centre, one person conveyed to hospital

Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) said that there was a fire in…

WP’s Gerald Giam invites PWD community to share their story, promises to propose solutions to make S’pore a more inclusive society

Newly elected Aljunied GRC Member of Parliament (MP) Gerald Giam took to…