(Photo: Worker writing how much he is owed in pay)
Straits Times reported that Ministry of Manpower (MOM), the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) and the Singapore National Employers Federation (SNEF) MOM, NTUC and SNEF has developed guidelines on how employers can issue itemised payslips (Straits Times, Jan 13).
Guidelines for payslips?
It states that employers can now refer to a set of guidelines on how to issue itemised payslips to employees and what information to include in them.
The tripartite guidelines which are developed by MOM, NTUC and SNEF, provide templates of payslips that companies may use and customise based on their own needs. According to the guidelines, the payslip should indicate and record items such as basic salary, total allowances and total deductions for each salary period.
No payslips” problem for a long time?
For years, a lot of people, including migrant worker NGOs have been asking for pay slips to be made mandatory, because it may be problematic when workers complain that they have not been paid or underpaid.
MOM said in a press release on Monday that the tripartite partners agree that the provision of itemised payslips to employees is a good employment practice as it raises employee’s awareness of their salary components and helps in resolving salary disputes.
And the ministry intends to mandate the issuance of itemised payslips within the next two year and added that the guidelines were developed after consultations with various stakeholders.
But does it not make you wonder why such a simple thing as having a pay slip needs to take years – involve so many organizations, processes, guidelines, etc?
The ministry then said in the press release that it received feedback that many smaller SMEs (small and medium enterprises), especially enterprises such as ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers, find issuing itemised payslips challenging. And the guidelines aim to prepare these businesses to change their practices in a sustainable way, so that they are able to comply when the ministry make it a legal requirement for payslip to be issued.
The question that follows this is why then can’t we make it mandatory and provide assistance to so called ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers – like for example what the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) has been doing so well for many years for tax submission?
If something so complicated as income tax can be done for assistance – why is it so difficult for a payslip?
How many items or combination of items can there be in a payslip that requires so many templates, guidelines, changing practices in a sustainable way, etc?
As I understand it, most if not all of the complaints and salary disputes are I understand not from so called ‘mom and pop’ shops and hawkers?
If indeed I am mistaken in this regard – can the statistics be given as to how many ‘mom and pop” shops and hawkers had salary disputes and complaints, relative to the total number of complaints?
Super complicated payslip?
The ministry said that it  is also working with the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore and SPRING Singapore to, by April 2014, provide tools such as simple payslip booklets, downloadable templates, and funding support for companies to develop customised solutions regarding the issuance of payslips. But don’t you get the feeling that its like “much ado over nothing”?
I mean after all – it’s just a simple one page payslip – can’t be so complicated that we seem to be talking about it like “rocket science”?
Labour movement?
Perhaps the labour movement’s statement tops it all, as to how arguably, farcical – this issue of payslips is becoming:
The Labour Movement  issued a statement in which it said:

The Labour Movement welcomes these guidelines as it would translate to greater transparency for workers. Providing workers with itemised payslips will go some way to help them better understand their salary components as well as provide a means of proper documentation.
On the part of workers, we encourage them to keep their payslips properly and clarify with their employers or HR personnel if they do not understand any of the components listed in their payslips.

Uniquely Singapore!
By Leong Sze Hian

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Hope that Mr Chan would stop playing at semantics and actually work at policy

Wow, the narrative has just grown even more creative! From the government’s…

三周后才通知客工确诊 人力部、卫生部称“行政疏失”向雇主道歉!

上周二,名为詹德拉的雇主,在脸书分享,在7月13日收到通知旗下一名客工确诊,但迟迟未被当局安排送往隔离中心,客工仍继续和11名室友同处一室。焦急万分、求助无门下,雇主只得上网把这件事情公开,求各界帮忙想办法。 卫生部和人力部在7月19日的联合文告,承认出现“行政疏失”(administrative error),迟至三周后才通知雇主有客工确诊,并向有关雇主道歉。 两个部门指出,上述确诊客工住在卓源宿舍,当局已联系雇主作出解释;与此同时,12名同室客工状况良好,且测试期间仍有医疗人员观察他们情况,也未出现急促呼吸症状。 有关客工和七名室友已痊愈,其余四名中,有三名新近感染,被送到社区护理中心,还有一名未被传染,但会在政府的隔离设施完成最后的隔离期。 根据早前詹德拉的脸书贴文,他指出客工是在6月22日接受冠病检测,但迟至7月13日才收到卫生部的简讯通知客工确诊。然而,即使客工主动要求隔离,也被宿舍保安告知没有空房,结果12客工仍继续共处一室,仅被要求戴上口罩。 詹德拉曾联系卫生部告知此事,但之后却仍没有动静,15日再拨电询问,岂知却被告知“系统中没有记录”,令詹德拉感到不论是宿舍和政府机构好像都在“踢皮球”。 根据卫生部文告,卓源宿舍从4月6日起就已被令隔离,6月22日,当局为客工进行抽样检测,以评估病毒的传播程度,让当局制定排查宿舍疫情的策略。 文告澄清,有关抽样检测不是针对个人的检测。上述客工和他11位室友,都被选中参与群体样本检测,而检测结果显示12位同室客工,有很大可能都被感染。 然而该部称,当局进行群体检测时却出现行政疏失,结果取样回来的拭子样本,只拿到上述确诊客工的。

Lee Weiling: “I continue to be ashamed at Hsien Loong’s disrespect for his father’s dying wish”

Expressing her disgust over a report by the Sunday Times, Dr Lee…

武汉冠病17天内夺一家四口 中国湖北导演病逝

武汉冠状病毒全球传播,多人因此被迫面临生离,而中国湖北电影制片厂导演、影视部主任常凯一家四口也在17天内先后病逝,仅剩妻子处于病危抢救中,远在英国留学的儿子则幸免。 据《希望之声》报导,湖北电影厂于2月16日发出讣告,指该厂“像音像”对外联络部主任常凯因为感染了新冠病毒,于2月14日在武汉市黄陂区人民医院逝世,享年55岁。 父亲回家自救逝世 据网传的常凯遗言中指出,其父亲在大年初一出现症状,但是医院已没有床位了,只能回家自救。父亲最后在家中逝世,母亲也因疲于照顾父亲,免疫力下降而被感染病毒,于2月4日被送入医院后,在老伴离世的一周后也撒手人寰了。 而常凯和妻子长期在床前服侍,因此都被传染。“怎奈位卑言轻,床位难觅,直至病入膏盲,错失医治良机”。常凯本人是于2月14日清晨过世,而经过证实,其居住在别处的姐姐,也于当日下午因新冠病毒离世。 据《红星新闻》引述湖北电影制片厂员工的话语指出,常凯曾表示其父亲于2月3日凌晨在家中离世,社区曾经在2月2日派医生到他们的家中查看,但是因为其父亲的病情发展太快,在十余小时后就过世了。 常凯生前预感自己或不久于世,于是留下了委屈且感慨万分的一封遗书。他以“我的一生为子尽孝、为父尽责、为夫爱妻、为人尽诚”作为自己一生的结论,并以“永别了我爱的人和爱我的人”来与世告别。 得奖导演 常凯是武汉人,生前是湖北电影制片厂的干部,曾经参与多部纪录片的制作,且一生从未离开过江城。 他的作品也离不开这个故土,曾经以制片主人身份参与拍摄《我的渡口》,讲述一户居住在渡口附近的居民,遵循祖训免费为大沙河边的村民摆渡了120年的故事,更成功于2014年第十四届平壤国际电影节上,包揽了最佳导演奖、最佳男主角奖和最佳音乐奖三项大奖。