By Tiffany Gwee
Photography by Jeremy Chan
A group of approximately 400 enthusiastic protesters gathered in Hong Lim Park yesterday evening to protest against the recent 3.2% public transport fare hike approved by the Public Transport Council (PTC) and the government earlier this year._DSC8663
Organised by activist Gilbert Goh, the event attracted many with placards that expressed their frustration, with phrases like “We Demand No Fare Hike” and “Why Pay More for Lousy Service” scribbled in bold letters, representing the crux of their anger and their hope for change with regards to public transport costs.
Speakers at the protest touched on what they perceived as supernormal profits that SMRT is already enjoying; the general decrease in affordability for the public; and the substandard quality of public transport as evident in the series of disruptions and breakdowns in recent times.
“Supernormal” profits and lack of accountability
Protesters were unhappy with the fact that the two major transport companies, SMRT and SBS Transit, are making “$120 million and $18 million in net profits respectively” and this is set to increase rapidly with the rise in train ridership as well.

Daryl Tan
Daryl Tan
Speaker Mr Daryl Tan, raised these concerns with the staggering statistical figures and linked the rise in ridership to the White Paper Policy as well. “With the White Paper Policy put in place, train ridership will only continue to increase,” he said. “This means that even without the fare hike, SMRT will still enjoy greater profits.”
This excessive focus on profits drew sharp criticism from another speaker, Mr Osman Sulaiman from the Reform Party, who referred to a quote from Dr Yeo Ning Hong, Minister for Communication and Information in 1986, pledging that the setting up of SMRT to operate train services will be disallowed to “profit at the expense of the public”. Mr Osman added that this is proven untrue presently as the profits made “will not be pumped into the system” and “will not benefit the public”.
“This is not meritocracy!” he asserted, to which the crowd before him broke into rousing cheers and agreement.
Osman Sulaiman
Osman Sulaiman
In relation to the sky-high profits, speakers pressed for the answer to one question: “Where do all the profits go to?”
The media release for the event stated that “Temasek Holdings controls 55% of SMRT and over-time it has collected close to $500 million in dividends from the transport company since 2011”. Mr Goh opined that it was not “viable” for a fare hike unless “the government comes clean” as to where the profits go to.
Mr Osman agreed, adding that the money used to fund the public transport system is “taxpayers’ money” and hence proper accountability was needed.
Decrease in affordability
Speakers also identified that the current unhappiness with the fare increase was in part to do with the lack of affordability of public transport once the fare hikes are put in place. While students, the disadvantaged, the elderly and those of the lower income groups can look forward to subsidies, the middle-income group was deemed to have been neglected, and this creates a major issue in terms of transport cost affordability.
According to Mr Tan, “raising the cost of public transport is fine” but only with a “rise in wages” as well. “Many of our wages remain stagnant,” he explained, citing it as a reason for the irrationality behind the fare hike.
Song Swee Choo
Song Swee Choo
Likewise, speaker Mr Song Swee Choo proclaimed that transport fares were “burning (his) pocket” and this is set to become worse with the ascending transport costs. Mr Song even walked the whole 8km from Serangoon’s Nex shopping mall to Hong Lim Park as his own way of protesting against the fare hikes – by not taking public transport to the venue.
Other than Mr Song, there were others who did likewise to demonstrate how the fare hike was hitting them directly. Mr. Alex Lim cycled from Punggol, while Mr Dennis Khew walked all the way from Hougang, in the spirit of boycotting public transport.
Another member from the audience, Mr Kue, expressed his dissatisfaction over being caught in a bind, seeing that he has “no choice but to take the public transport everyday” as he could not afford private transportation.
Decreasing quality of public transport
The fare increase was also a sore point for commuters as they do not see a current improvement in service standards among the public transport operators (PTOs).
Mr Tan listed all the different train disruptions and breakdowns that had happened since the General Elections in 2011. With the continued delays and inconvenience caused by service breakdowns, he could not see the fare hikes as reasonable. 
A member of the audience, Mr John Loh, agreed with him. He felt that SMRT is “not doing enough to improve the service to the people”. “There are no major maintenance works done. The profits go to Temasek Holdings and SMRT, and yet no repair is done,” he said.
In reference to the PTC’s claim that the breakdowns and fare hike were two separate issues, Mr Tan provided the audience with an analogy that showed just the opposite._DSC8674
“If you are not performing well in your job, you don’t have to worry. Just approach your boss and ask for a pay raise. If your boss tells you, ‘you siao (crazy) ah’ (because of the terrible work performance), then just tell your boss that your work performance and pay raise are separate issues!”
Mr Osman suggested that there should be “more competition brought in to bring the costs down”, and proposed for a complete nationalisation of the public transport system. He also opined that both the SMRT chief executive and Transport Minister “have no experience in the field of transport”, and called for someone “more experienced and capable” to take over their roles.
Standing up for change, and positivity
Despite the anger directed at the PTC, the PTOs and the Transport Minister, the protest did not give in to futility. Mr Song encouraged the crowd to “not be afraid” as the government might “revoke (the) policy if the people say so”._DSC8739
Mr Tan also believed that Singaporeans should be more vocal about what they believe in. “I am a very vocal person and this is my third time speaking in Hong Lim Park. I am not afraid to stand up for my country.”
Protest organiser Mr Goh spoke positively about the “very participative audience”. “They were truly involved and they were also very angry. I am contented that the protest was a success.”_DSC8719
Mr Goh also expressed hope that SMRT will “listen to them” and “buck up on their services”, as they seek to better manage the breakdowns.
And despite having battered an effigy of the Transport Minister, the crowed ended the evening in song, evoking national pride as they sang ‘Stand Up for Singapore’ and ‘Rasa Sayang’. The laughter and easy banter they shared belied the anger and frustration within, as each sought for change in their country.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

公司招聘帖称“欧洲/西方人士为佳”? 遭劳动发展局要求更正

一家公司在劳动力发展局的MyCareersFuture.sg官网,发布招聘员工广告,然而工作条件令人傻眼,敢敢放“欧洲/西方人士为佳”(preferably Europeans/ Westerners),被劳动力发展局质询,才在本月9日删除有关工作条件。 这家公司名为Ramo Industries,发布一则招聘业务发展经理的贴文,月薪介于8千至1万2000元。 工作条件方面,要求在建筑行业的企业发展领域,应至少有15年工作经验、专业、良好沟通技巧、可维持高标准、能独立工作等等。看起来都是本地专才都能胜任的。 然而最后一条工作条件,竟是“欧洲/西方人士为佳”?说好的不要歧视本地求职者呢? 据了解,这则招聘贴文在上月26日就已在MyCareersFuture.sg官网发布。对此,劳动发展局在脸书官方专页发文,指出已联系有关公司要求解释,该公司也在本月9日下午2时许,对招聘贴文作出更正。 不过,劳资政三方公平与良好雇佣联盟(TAFEP)亦关注此事,将找该公司详谈,了解和检讨其聘雇做法。 劳动发展局也提醒雇主,若招聘时排除新加坡人、或有意提及倾向聘雇非新加坡人,都可能构成招聘歧视。 We are…

忧生态遭破坏居民发起联署护林 徐顺全冀反思居住环境素质

位于武吉巴督2道和5道之间的一片丛林(Bukit Batok Hillside Park),可能将被清空以作为发展住宅区用途,担忧生态多样性和物种栖息地遭破坏,一名当地居民Jimmy Tan发起联署,呼吁当局对这片树林高抬贵手。 民主党秘书长徐顺全,也偕同Jimmy Tan走进树林探访,他关注清空树林可能带来的损失,以及随发展化对人口、生活环境和生态的影响,更喊话武吉巴督议员穆仁理,应联署赞同保住树林。 截至今晚(27日)9时许,联署人数已经突破5千人。 据了解,建屋发展局今年较早时发布环境评估报告,武吉巴督森林区共有多达81个物种,包括五种受威胁的鸟类,包括:凤头鹰雕以及锈胸杜鹃,也可能有马来穿山甲或猫猴。 另外,有74种植物,其中10种属于濒危。 这片面积达17公顷的森林,目前已有一半被清除,以建造West Scape…

王瑞杰:110亿元“应对冠病坚韧配套” 保护公共健康、支援工友、企业

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,于今日下午(16日)发表2021年财政预算案声明。他称为了建设更坚韧的新加坡,政府拨款110亿元,用于“应对冠病坚韧配套”(COVID-19 Resilience Package)。 配套下三管齐下:第一,给予公共卫生所需的支援,保护公共健康及安全地重启经济。 其二,支持有需要的工友和企业。 以及为仍在面对压力的特定领域,提供支援。 在应对冠病坚韧配套”下,政府拨出48亿元用在公共卫生及安全重启经济措施。 他也指出,去年我国整体预算赤字达到649亿元,占我国国内生产总值的13.9%,乃开国以来最高。 在去年疫情影响下,政府耗资将近1000亿元协助国人、企业渡过难关。

Punishment for officers in NSF Dominique Sarron Lee's case appropriate: MINDEF

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) in a reply to commentary in Lianhe…