By Nix

cockburn

I work in the south-western region of metropolitian Perth. So it is an everyday thing to drive past through the City of Cockburn. Lately I spotted some curious signage all over the city that cried, “Hands off Cockburn!” Many of these signage were not professionally made. Some were even handwritten and erected casually by the side of the road. However, the messages on these were far from casual and I could feel the messengers were dead serious about that.The protestants were residents of Cockburn. (pronounced as Ko-burn, in case you have a picture of a charred dick in your mind) They were protesting against the state government’s intention to break up the City of Cockburn and merge the northern and southern parts to the City of Melville and Kwinana respectively. My curiosity with the random signs led me to do a brief read up online and learnt that the Cockburn community actually held a protest outside the Parliament House last month to have their voices heard: They did not want their City to be carved up and given to other councils.

At the rally, the Cockburn community submitted its own proposal, (I will spare you the details) along with almost 11,000 signatures from the electors showing the community support for their proposals. What impressed me was the committee behind this only took ten days to come out with a 100-page proposal and manage to amass close to 11,000 people to support it. Quite a feat, if you think about how logistically challenged it is for them to do so as compared to our situation in Singapore. That only tells me one thing, the community spirit is very strong over here, much like the Kampong Spirit that used to exist many pockets of Singapore.

These protestants would be arrested by the police if they had done that in Singapore. One would wonder why. Did the protest (shown above) look like a Little India riot to you? Were the protestants violent or disorder? No. Did they cause public inconveniences? No. The most important question Singaporeans should think about, do we have a right to voice out against decisions of the government that we do not agree with? The community of Cockburn had it and did it. Whether or not their proposal would be accepted later was inconsequential to me (but obviously not to them) because I felt the whole thing was a new experience, a new sensation to me altogether. It made me feel the place was actually alive, not the boring Perth that Singaporeans love to assume. It made me feel that people here are living things who care about the people, community groups, nature and identity around them unlike the absolute apathy that I used to experience in “vibrant Singapore.”
I wrote this not to condone protests or encourage people to become dissidents but to highlight the importance of having passionate close knitted communities in Singapore. In an environment where the government tells the people regularly to “take care of ourselves”, my point couldn’t be emphasize enough. Unfortunately, our community spirit is fast dwindling. Think about it, if we cannot even be attached to our surroundings or take pride in our community identity, how will the future generation be take pride in their country?
If you want proof that the people don’t give a damn what happens to their constituencies, just look for anyone who gave a damn when the GRCs of Cheng San or Eunos were broken up to combine with the other GRCs or wards. Most of us didn’t even understand the impact of these arrangements. Will the residents of Potong Pasir voice their unhappiness (if any) when they become part of a GRC in the next elections? To us, a constituency border is just a boundary line on the map, only applicable during the General Elections. Besides, what can we do about it? Protest like the Cockburn residents? I am not sure at all Singaporeans would bother to do so even if protesting is made legal in Singapore. It isn’t about protesting, it is about whether we even care or not. We don’t and probably never will.
Perhaps the system was designed with the purpose of segregating the people so that power can be eternally maintained since the divided can be easily conquered., combined with the constant emphasis on materialism, so that the people would focus solely on material pursuits and be useful economic numbers in their entire life span. What an amazing model. Such brilliance. But life is so cruel for the people who woke.
This article was first published in http://asingaporeanson.blogspot.sg

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What claim have we to another’s citizenship?

By Ariffin Sha A petition circulating online, directed at the Singapore Government,…

统计局称本地居民平均月入1万1780元

今日,本地中英主流媒体都有刊载来自新加坡统计局发布的数据,该局公布五年一度的家庭开支调查报告,其中指出,本地居民平均每月家庭收入达到1万1780元,高于2012/13年的约1万零470元,年均增幅约2.4巴仙。 但是一些网民对于这样的数据感到“难以置信”,这是因为家庭月入1万1780元,假设家中有两夫妻同时打工,平均两人收入达到5890元,但事实上许多人的薪资根本没有那么高。 之前有网民分享,一名外卖快递员若勤劳工作,每月收入可达到四千余元,而也有青年开私召车,每月确实可净赚5000元,但那也要每日不间断开车12-14小时、平均载客20-25趟才有办法赚到。 另外还记得本社此前报导,总统府聘请管家和厨师的招聘广告?助理高级管家的薪酬大约在1400-2000元之间,并以2000至2500元之间薪资招聘厨师。 而根据人力部的数据,专业厨师(40-49岁)中位数薪资,约为3532元,而扣除公积金后,所得也至少有2826元。 所以让我们假定:某家庭两夫妻都出外挣钱,丈夫开私召车每月净赚五千元,而妻子是餐馆专业厨师,扣除公积金后带回家收入2826元,加起来也只有7826元,哪有统计局公布的那么多? 根据统计局定义,居民指的是,以新加坡公民或永久居民为一家之主的家庭,而家庭收入包括雇佣收入、经商收入和其他非工作所得收入如投资、租金收益和政府津贴等等。 与此同时,本地居民平均每月家庭开销达到4910元,但年均增幅比起2012/13年仅为0.8巴仙,故此,统计局得出结论,五年期间家庭收入增长快于家庭开支。 报告也指收入最高20巴仙家庭收入增长最慢,年均增长为1.6巴仙;住在一房式和二房式组屋的家庭,收入增长最快,年均增长6.3巴仙。 报告指出,收入最低20巴仙家庭,17/18年平均每月开支2570元,比平均月入2235元超出300元,他们的家庭开支增长也最快。 网民:为何不公布中位数收入? 对于统计局的报告,网民并不买账,一些网民认为,理应展示国民中位数收入才比较能反映实况,因为平均收入,就意味着低收入群体和高收入群体的收入总和起来再平均,结果就显得收入比较高了。…

Malaysia’s “balanced growth” better than Singapore’s “higher growth”? (Part 1)

by Leong Sze Hian Malaysia’s former prime minister, Tun Dr Mahathir said…

COVID-19: MOH investigating and identifying 95 Singaporeans who attended religious event in Malaysia

In a Facebook post on Thursday (12 March), Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affair…