maruah

Unpublished letter that was sent to Forum Page of The Straits Times

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

Dear Sir

MARUAH is deeply concerned at the closure of Breakfast Network’s website as a result of their decision not to submit the registration forms required by the Media Development Authority (MDA).

MDA had, in a statement to The Independent published on Dec 4 2013, responded to MARUAH’s earlier statement about MDA’s move to require Breakfast Network and The Independent to register, as well as the pending contempt of court charge against Mr Alex Au. In that response, MDA stated that foreign entities may not be allowed to control local media platforms; registration does not “seek to affect what The Independent and Breakfast Network can publish on their site”, similar to how MARUAH — who have also registered with MDA as a political website — has been able to freely comment on issues and policies; and registration does not prevent the two sites from receiving “bona fide commercial revenue, foreign advertisers included” and does not require the two sites to “provide detailed information of their subscriber base”.

The closure of Breakfast Network’s website demonstrates that regardless of MDA’s stated intent, the registration requirement has chilled and reduced the space for free expression in Singapore. As a regulator tasked with developing the media landscape in Singapore, MDA should consider the substantive impact of its decisions, not just its own subjective intent. Registration requirements can operate to censor free expression as effectively as, and more insidiously than, outright demands to remove content.

The forms published by Breakfast Network also show that MDA has asked them, if not The Independent, to identify every person who has provided funding to them, as well as every subscriber and advertiser who contributes 5% or more of their subscription or advertising revenue. As we stated previously, these requirements, in particular the former, are overly-intrusive and go far beyond what is necessary to satisfy the stated objective of preventing foreign influence over the media. Even the Political Donations Act, under which MARUAH has been gazetted as a political association and which also regulates political parties, does not require every person who has provided funding to be specifically identified.

Finally, MDA’s statement raises questions about its inconsistent application of policy on foreign entities in local media, given that Yahoo! Singapore, which is individually licensed by MDA, is a US-owned operation.

We again call on MDA to reverse its actions against Breakfast Network and The Independent. A thriving online media environment benefits Singapore and Singaporeans, and those actions are clearly regressive moves.

Braema Mathi (Ms)

President

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Bilahari: President Xi must act if protests in Hong Kong continue

On Mon this week (17 Jun), former Singapore Ambassador-at-Large Bilahari Kausikan commented…

今年4月 近3800公司结业!

贸工部高级政务部长徐芳达,在国会答复议员提问时坦言,受到疫情冲击,今年4月,本地有大约3800家公司结束营业,和过去五年同一个月份的平均3700家相近。 但他认为,有鉴于疫情的对我国经济的冲击,接下来很有可能有更多企业结束营业。 同期有约3800家新公司注册,但比过去五年同月份相比,少了近三分之一。 旅游限制也让航空运输、旅游业等蒙受损失,零售和食品服务等行业也因游客减少面对打击。

国家发展部公布2017市镇会财报 阿裕尼-后港市镇会被点名

国家发展部于今日发文告,公布已提交各市镇会2017年财政报告予国会,民众也可到市镇会网站http://www.towncouncils.sg/查阅完整报告。 有关2017财政年市镇会报告,是针对去年四月至今年三月的表现进行评估,依据市镇会管辖的清洁、维修管理、电梯性能、水价和服务与杂费(S&CC)欠款管理和企业治理(corporate governance)等方面接受评估。 根据国家发展部文告,大部分市镇会的2017年财政年财务报表的审计结果为“无保留”(unqualified),但阿裕尼-后港市镇会的财务报表,则被外部审计师评估为“有所保留”(qualified)。 至于获评估“有所保留”的原因,乃是该市镇会未实时记录花费,内部控管薄弱。国家发展部称,这是阿裕尼-后港市镇会连续七年,被外部审计师评估其财报“有所保留”。 也因此,阿裕尼-后港市镇会在企业管理方面,获得“琥珀色”评级。 不过, 在十六个市镇会中,还有另外三家市镇会也获得琥珀色评级,即:碧山-大巴窑市镇会、淡滨尼市镇会和丹戎巴葛市镇会。 四市镇会在企业治理上仅获琥珀评级 碧山-大巴窑市镇会并没有遵照市镇会财务准则,在收到报价后在市镇会内公开讯息流通。 淡滨尼市镇会则误把运营基金的数额,转移到偿债基金和电梯更换基金。报告称,有关市会虽已发现并更正此计算失误,但是有关正确数额在极度结束后的一个月内还没有转移,因此属不合规情况。 至于丹戎巴葛市镇会,在已经支出后,才从其他地方转移预算到“清洁和公用事务开支”上。…