By Andrew Loh, Photos by Lawrence Chong/Thum PJ

On 22 August 2013, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the setting up of a steering committee to plan Singapore’s 50th year of Independence celebrations in 2015. To be headed by Education Minister, Heng Swee Keat, the plan is for Singaporeans “to reflect on who we are and how far we have come as a people.”

“We want every Singaporean to be able to connect through their personal stories with the broader Singapore story, and be a part of the anniversary celebrations,” Mr Heng said.

Indeed, this tiny island has come a long way from its tumultuous beginnings, and there is much to celebrate and be thankful for, even as we work together to solve the problems we face today.

But one cannot truly celebrate our nationhood without also being honest about how we came to be. In fact, that should and must be the starting point for our look-back on the last 50 years of being one people.

In other words, what is the truth of how we became a nation?

Throughout these 50 years, there has mostly been one version of that story, told by one party, repeatedly – a one-sided, unquestioned, narrative presented as the factual truth on television and radio programmes, in books, in government-controlled newspapers.The victors of the battle for Independence told our story, our history, from their view, and in the event, glorified themselves.

The losers were communists and that was that.

But how true is this narrative?

Historians of late have started to tell a different story.

Those who were detained under 1963’s Operation Coldstore, long painted by the PAP Government as communist insurgents who posed an extraordinary threat to our very survival, have emerged in recent times to tell their side of the story.

More importantly perhaps, their account is supported by the work of historians and declassified 50-year old secret papers from our former colonial rulers, the British.

The latest historian to step up and offer an alternative narrative is the very distinguished Dr Thum Ping Tjin.

A Rhodes Scholar and a Commonwealth Scholar who attended Harvard (when he was 16-years old) and Oxford, Dr Thum’s research areas included Decolonisation and the Cold War in Southeast Asia; and the history of Singapore and Malaysia.

Dr Thum has presented his research into Operation Coldstore at various occasions, including at NUS and in private talks.

Most recently, on 16 November, Dr Thum gave a 20-minute speech at the launch of the book on the February 1963 arrests, titled: “The 1963 Operation Coldstore in Singapore – Commemorating 50 years”.

Dr Thum related a significantly different story of Operation Coldstore from the state narrative we have been offered all these years. The declassification of the British papers, particularly, gave important insights into the behind-the-scenes political manoeuvres by the main interested parties at the time – the British government, the Tunku of Malaysia, and Lee Kuan Yew, prime minister of Singapore.

Dr Thum says the events which led to the arrest of the members of the Barisan Socialist, branded as “communists”, were in fact politically motivated, and were not ideological.

Indeed, he empathetically rejects any suggestion that the detainees were communist at all.

“Let me get this straight, let me say this,” Dr Thum told the packed room at last Saturday’s book launch. “Were the Barisan and the other detainees of Operation Coldstore part of a communist conspiracy? No. No. No. No.”

“Special Branch and the ISD did not, does not have any evidence that the Operation Coldstore detainees were engaged in any communist conspiracy.”

This directly contradicts the very reason which the PAP government, and Lee Kuan Yew in particular, have always given for the arrests of the 133 detainees in 1963.

The arrests, according to Dr Thum, were to accede to the Tunku’s desire for the more liberal political opposition in Singapore to be curtailed. The arrests also assured that there were no alternatives to the PAP in the next general elections, a result which would not be unwelcome by the PAP then.

In an interview with website The Online Citizen (TOC), Dr Thum explained:

“The Tunku was openly worried about the impact of the Barisan Sosialis in a unified Malaysia. He feared their organisational skills and the inspired, ‘talismanic’ leadership of Lim Chin Siong. He thus demanded that Singapore’s political opposition be arrested as a condition of merger.”

Dr Thum also revealed that Operation Coldstore was originally planned to take place on 16 December 1962. It was, however, postponed because Mr Lee had wanted to include a further 15 of his political opponents onto the list to be detained, which the Tunku rejected. And a stand-off ensued, with the British playing middleman. Eventually, it was agreed that the operation would proceed in February 1963.

[Do read the interview and watch the video of Dr Thum’s speech. They are most enlightening.]

The story of Singapore’s birth is not the one-dimensional portrayal of Lee Kuan Yew and the PAP as benevolent victors over the “communists”, as we are often told. Instead, historians such as Dr Thum and Dr Lysa Hong, and the former detainees themselves, tell us that there is more to it than what we have been told all these years.

But we need courage to tell the whole truth about how our nation came to be, and to shine a spotlight on the facts.

There is no better time than Singapore’s 50th anniversary to do so.

Will the steering committee led by Mr Heng see the importance of giving space to historians to tell our history factually and dispassionately, on a national platform, as part of our 50th anniversary celebrations?

Will Mr Heng’s committee have the courage to allow the voices of those who are an integral part of our history be heard, besides that of the ruling party; and let Singaporeans – finally – see that there were more than one who believed in and fought for and sacrificed for Singapore?

“We want every Singaporean,” Mr Heng said, “to be able to connect through their personal stories with the broader Singapore story…”

I agree. There is no better place to start than with the facts surrounding Operation Coldstore.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

最新消息:纳吉确认被捕

大马反贪污委员会于今天下午,前往前首相纳吉住家,展开逮捕行动。 据报导,反贪会已完成调查报告,包括纳吉涉嫌洗黑钱和非法挪用资产的详情,认为罪证确凿,建议逮捕纳吉。 根据一马公司调查团队文告,反贪会成员在下午2时35份逮捕纳吉,协助调查与SRC国际公司案,纳吉将在明早8.30面临提控。 SRC国际公司乃是一马公司子公司,2012年在财政部旗下。 不过,反贪会表示,呼吁各界静候该局进一步的文告。 早前,首相敦马哈迪曾表示,控告纳吉的罪状“近乎完美”,需要长达月余的调查,就是希望能确保诉讼万无一失。

SDP’s chief Chee Soon Juan reiterates the importance of having full-time MPs to serve the people

“An MP needs to go full time so that you can pay…

阻断措施正式结束,当局吁民众出门仍需戴口罩

我国将在今日(6月2日)起,进入解封第一阶段,尽管如此,民众出门仍需戴口罩,防护面罩并不能取代口罩。 抗疫跨部门工作小组昨日(1日)在视讯记者会上表示,我国今日开始将会开始恢复各项活动和服务,然而民众在出门之际仍需戴上口罩,不能以防护面罩取而代之。 对此,卫生部医药服务总监麦锡威副教授解释,冠状病毒是通过飞沫传播,口罩的设计能够完美覆盖面部,而防护面罩的设计与面部仍留有缝隙。 在阻断措施期间,当局会允许民众以防护面罩替代口罩是因为人流较少,然而随着阻断措施的结束,人们也开始恢复活动,接触更多的人,因此防疫措施必须更严谨。 目前除非是不适合戴口罩的特定群体如12岁以下的孩童、有健康状况、不适合长时间戴口罩的人、需要讲课的教师,以及电视主播等可以不戴口罩。 麦锡威指出,那些不适合戴口罩的民众,在穿戴防护面罩时,必须确保面罩完全覆盖面部,可以遮住额头到下巴。

“社媒不应只炫耀富裕和成功” 知名主持人坦然叙述家人疫情下挑战

“我爸不再工作,我哥正艰难地寻找工作,我妹转换职业,而我正在(就业)的十字路口。” 本地知名活动主持人Matthew Zachary Liu(以下译名刘马修),本月4日在脸书上发文,分享自家家庭因疫情所受到的影响,尽管他的家庭是小康之家,不算富裕也不缺任何物质,但如今家人都在挣扎生存,工作也变得相当不稳定,使家庭面临了一些挑战。 刘马修认为,与其在社交媒体上向其他人炫耀自己更富裕更舒适的成功,他反而想要刻画出更真实,更贴近现今生活的帖文,让如今经历痛苦的人能够从中受到启发,给予人们力量,一同度过疫情。 刘马修最后也指出,“我们都在往不同的方向走去,经历不同的困难。有时候会感到相当失望,不过无论什么东西或病毒砸向我们,我们必须定时在内心深处不停挖掘勇气,让我们勇敢度过,即使已经达到极限,或者太脆弱无法跨过,总会有人给我们力量,帮助我们度过。” “从小到大,我从未真正担心过任何经济问题,但长大后,我才意识到爸爸这些年默默地为家庭所付出的辛苦。” 刘马修的工作为一名活动主持人,受到疫情的影响,他的收入也减少了30巴仙,与此同时,父亲也进入退休年龄,在疫情之际退休。 谈及父亲,刘马修表示父亲作为公务员工作了40余年,一直都仰赖这份工作养家糊口,公务员被视为“铁饭碗”,他也庆幸他们家并不需要担忧财务,但近期父亲因被迫退休,才让他真正意识到父亲一直以来,默默为家庭付出。 “父亲在早年因为一些情况被迫提早进入社会,以至于他无法享受最好的教育机会。但在职场需要比其他有文凭的人更加努力证明自己,也让他花了比一般人更长的时间才获得晋升机会。” 他指出,父亲其中一个愿望是希望三个孩子都能够接受大学教育,获得更好的未来,而且他在辛苦工作的同时,仍需为家人操心,提供所需,最终孩子们也如他所愿,在他供给下完成大学教育。 父亲在疫情下退休…