Translated from Wanbao , “运尸车接获罚单 殡葬业者:没人情味

Video from Wanbao

4 summon tickets in a mere 15 minutes park at the roadside to ferry the body for funeral. Coffin delivery man complains: “Devoid of compassion to issue summon while the deceased and the coffin is still on the vehicle!”. This incident happened at around 1pm on 4th November at the roadside of Jalan Membina Block 22.

A funeral service provider who does not wish to be named complained that during the incident, four lorries were delivering the coffin, the deceased along with some funeral offerings to the funeral site.

As there is only a small road for parking beside the funeral site. Although the road is marked with a double yellow line but the provider still parked the lorries by the roadside out of convience to shift the coffin and the body of the deceased to site.

“We parked the lorries at the small road, got off the lorries to settle some affairs with the deceased’s family. Who would have expected to find 3 vehicles to be summoned within just 15 minutes, each vehicles being fined 100 dollars!”

He said that when the vehicles were being given the summon, the deceased along with the coffin were still on the vehicle, and cannot understand why the traffic warden could not have been more accommodating when they knew that the family is having a funeral, and still went ahead to issue the traffic summon.

He added that, the lorry that was ferrying the coffin had its rear door opened and could clearly see the coffin, the traffic warden surely would have know that they were having a funeral.

To make things worse, apart from 3 of the lorries from the funeral provider were being given the summons, the car of the deceased’s family was also given one summon.

“I know that by parking the vehicles on the double yellow line is a violation of the traffic rules but we can’t possibly drive the vehicles to the multi-storey carpark and then shift the deceased’s body and the coffin from upstairs.”

He feels that the traffic wardens should be more flexible when it comes to handing such incidents, and communicate with the family of the deceased and the funeral service providers.

Deceased’s family help in appeal

The family of the deceased took in the 3 parking summons to help in appealing. The funeral service provider who does not wish to be named revealed that the deceased’s family facing the sorrow of losing one’s daughter still went out of way to take over their 3 summon tickets and expressed their willingness in helping to appeal, this made him very touched.

He said that he has confidence that the appeal will go through but hope that when the traffic wardens face with such circumstances, they could show more compassion in handling of the situation.

Zheng Hai Chuan – Mostly accommodating

Funeral service provider: If traffic parking rules are violated, traffic warden would mostly accomodate.

Local well-known funeral service provider, Zheng Hai Chuan said during an interview that the providers would park the vehicles to park at the road nearest to the funeral site, which sometimes would evidently foul the law.

“Sometimes the bus which ferry the friends and relatives of the deceased would also park by the roadside but not for a long time”

He said that most traffic wardens would be compassionate. if the funeral service provider require to park their vehicles on a double-yellow lane, they would give allowance as these vehicles will only park a while before driving off.

He would also communicate with the traffic wardens and never met with funeral vehicles being issued summons before.

“Maybe the traffic warden do not know that this vehicle is related to funeral, and so issued the summons”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Suspects of Indonesia's forest and land fires largely comprise S'pore and M'sian firms: Environment and Forestry Ministry Director-General

A large number of the companies being investigated by the Indonesia’s Ministry…

Why WP is right to seek court’s decision

By Andrew Loh The trial of the Workers’ Party Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town…

一马公司舞弊案:美证交委员会点名纳吉获一马债券回扣

马来西亚前首相纳吉涉嫌一马公司舞弊案,一直自称清白,而美国在展开调查时,多次以“马国一号官员”形容当中主要涉案者,让人雾里看花。 但近日美国证券交易委员会,指高盛集团前东南亚地区主管雷斯纳抵触该国多项法令中,更直接点名纳吉涉案。 不过该委会表示,有意接受雷纳斯提出的庭外和解条件。 综合媒体报道,美国证交委会今日在发文告称,在高盛集团前董事雷斯纳为一马公司(1MDB)发行债券时,纳吉从中获得了回扣。 美国证卷交易委员会也列出详细的资讯,指控雷斯纳与其他人策划挪用27亿美元资金,以贿款和回扣的方式,分派给马国和阿布达比政府官员,参与人包括纳吉以及项目参与者与其家人,而雷斯纳也从中获益。 “雷斯纳也意识到,纳吉将会从2012年1MDB债券Maximus计划获益,并了解到当时纳吉、阿布达比官员及1MDB官员,会从Maximus计划的收益中获得金钱,该计划通过雷斯纳、刘特佐等人实际控制的空壳公司转移这些金钱。” 此外,美国证卷交易委员会也指出,纳吉的近亲也获得挪用资金。 Maximus项目是一马公司在2012年发行的两笔债券中的第二笔。 根据美国司法部,纳吉在此阶段获得3000万美元回扣。在2013年的Catalyze计划中,纳吉从一马公司中挪用6亿8100万美元。 除了雷斯纳,另有一名大马银行家黄宗华以及未具名的高盛集团同事也正在受审,被指与雷斯纳同谋从三组债卷中窃取共25亿美元的刑事阴谋。 据悉,Catalyze计划结束时,还有附加交易产生回扣,包括“将大约130万美元汇入一名纽约珠宝商的户头,以为纳吉配偶支付珠宝款项。” 这涉及刘特佐为纳吉夫人罗斯玛购买27个18克拉的金项链和手镯。

No train service on EWL due to train fault

Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT) announced on Wednesday (2 November) afternoon that…