Focus on Healthcare is a five-part series that provides a critical analysis of Singapore’s healthcare system, popularly known as the 3M system (MediShield, Medisave, Medifund). Through it, we hope to provide an understanding of how healthcare financing is currently being funded and used in Singapore, and explore the ways in which this can be further enhanced to cater for the needs of Singaporeans.

In this second part, we take a look at exactly how much we have in the 3M piggy bank, and how best it can be spent before we have to consider raising premiums or taxes.

 

By Roy Ngerng and Leong Sze Hian

Following his announcement during the National Day Rally 2013 to tweak the 3M system, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced that government healthcare subsidies will increase, and that the MediShield Life premiums and Medisave contribute rates will also be increased, to foot the increase in healthcare spending, because “we each have to take personal responsibility for ourselves.”

A few days later, Channel NewsAsia reported that PM Lee had “reiterated that while the government will do more, ‘good things need to be paid for’.” He also said, “If I’m discussing whether to raise taxes or not, I think I will never finish that discussion. So, one day when we have to raise taxes, the government will just have to make up its mind and say, ‘ok, I have to decide, I have to do this, I have to persuade people’, because otherwise it’s not workable.”

It was also reported in the Today newspaper that, “the government is unlikely to raise income tax to pay for the slew of healthcare, housing and infrastructure initiatives announced.” Rather, “the Goods and Services Tax (GST) might instead be the first in line for an increase should the Government need to raise revenue.”

However, as some observers have noted, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam had said in the run-up to the general election in 2011 that the GST will not be raised “at least for five years” because, he said, “there’s absolutely no reason to raise the GST.” We are only two years into this “five years”.

But how much do Singaporeans have in their MediShield and Medisave right now? And is there a need for Singaporeans to pay more, either through additional premiums or taxes?

For Medisave, in 2012, there was a total balance of $60 billion but the amount withdrawn for direct medical expenses was only $768 million – this effectively makes up only 1.3% of the total balance.

For MediShield, Parliament had also revealed that the MediShield surplus is $850 million for the last 10 years. In 2011, only $282 million MediShield claims were made. This means that only 24.9% of the known MediShield reserves had been claimed.

Finally, for Medifund, in 2012, the capital sum is $3 billion. Of this, only $98.2 million was disbursed in 2012. This represents only 3.3% of the capital.

In graphic terms:

medisavechart2

If we take these figures as an annual average, the withdrawals from Medisave make up only 1% of the balance, MediShield only 25%, and Medifund only 3%.

Adding them all up, there would be about $64 billion in balance in the 3Ms. The total of $1 billion spent would make up only 1.8% of the total 3M balance.

The question to ask: What happened to the rest of the 98.2% – or $63 billion – of the 3M balance?

What’s more, if we look back at the Medisave balance, the amount has been steadily increasing while the amount withdrawn has been slowing down.

In 2012, there was an increase of 9.5% in the total Medisave balance, from $54.8 billion to $60 billion. However, for the amount withdrawn, it only grew by less than a tenth of it, at 0.9%, from $761 million to $768 million.

Moreover, Medisave is also invested in Singapore government bonds, which earn annualised returns of 16% in S$ terms for the last 39 years, and about 6% in US$ terms for the last 20 years, respectively.

From the statistics above, it would seem that there is no deficit in running the Medisave, MediShield and Medifund schemes. On the contrary, the government is accumulating a huge surplus of more than 98% of the 3M balance.

To be clear, since the 3M schemes have high accumulated surpluses, they don’t actually cost the government a single cent. In fact, because Singaporeans are forking up the money through taxes and Medisave, they are in effect paying for their own healthcare bills by themselves. Worse yet, they are paying a portion of their own wages into these schemes, without seeing significant real returns comparable to those obtained by the government, whilst these schemes continue to accumulate surpluses.

Watch this space for part three, where we will try to work out the sums that will continue financing our healthcare needs without incurring additional taxes or premiums. And no, we are not trying to take over the Finance Minister’s job…

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MDA’s actions raise doubts about its capacity as media authority

The FreeMyInternet group expresses our grave concerns about the Media Development Authority’s…

Man tackled down by police and auxiliary officers at Changi Airport

Police officers and auxiliary officers were forced to tackle down an individual…

Christian lawyer in 377A constitutional challenge explains why his involvement is consistent with his faith

Jordan Tan is one of the lawyers bringing the constitutional challenge against…

淡马锡控股CEO 收入知多少?

淡马锡控股乃是我国主权基金,不过,在2017年盈利达到268亿新元的公司,其首席执行长(CEO)究竟收入多少,至今仍是个谜,也不曾公开于众。 现任淡马锡控股执行董事兼首席执行长为何晶,她同时也是总理李显龙夫人。2004年曾入榜美国《财富》杂志亚洲25位最具影响力女性企业家。 淡马锡控股并无义务对公众公布公司特定详情,致使坊间一直只能揣测该公司CEO薪资。何晶在该公司的显赫位置,加上李显龙成为全球最高薪的国家领导人,这个国家第一家族的身家,长期来都是民间茶余饭后的谈资。 我们当前只能透过公司规模和投资模式,来粗略推断淡马锡CEO的薪资。首先我们从淡马锡控股2018年年度报告,可以发现该年的行政开销达到86亿(详见报告中的第50页)。一般公司的薪资开销都纳入该栏目,也包括该控股约700余管理层和职员的薪水、顾问和法务费用。 假定首席执行员的年薪为行政开销的0.1巴仙、乃至0.001巴仙都好,相当于860万新元。 另一参照点为公司的规模。在新加坡股票交易所,星展银行(DBS )拥有最大市值。根据星展银行2017年度报告,记载该公司创下45亿元的盈利,股东权益达498亿元,总资产值5千170亿元。 相对下,淡马锡控股的盈利达到268亿元,股东权益2千720亿元,总资产4千170亿元(详见报告中第51页)。 星展总裁年薪过1千万元 y根据近期《商业内幕》、《商业时报》以及《Dollars and Sense》报导有关星展银行总裁高博德(Piyush…