By Terry Xu

Yesterday morning’s heavy storm brought more than 100 mm of rain to various parts of Singapore. Areas affected included the National University of Singapore and the Sungai Ulu Pandan and Sungai Pandan Kechil reservior banks, both of which overflowed. The flood created a major inconvenience for those going to work and to school.

Minister of Environment and Water Resources (MEWR), Dr Vivian Balakrishnan, said on his Facebook page that the drainage improvement work at Commonwealth Avenue will be completed by June 2015. He also said that to resolve the flooding at the Ayer Rajah Expressway (AYE), which had to be shut down during yesterday’s flood, will require a major project to expand Sungai Pandan Kechil. This will be expedited in view of the recent flooding, the minister said.

Flooding is not a new occurrence in Singapore. At Commonwealth, for example, there had already been records of similar floodings back in 2007.

 Video by Azhar Khamis

So will enhancing the drainage system resolve the problem?

While it is commendable to try to improve the drainage system to prevent future flooding , the effect of increasing urbanisation in Singapore should not be overlooked.

Minister Tan Chuan Jin, former Senior Minister of State for National Development, had denied this association of increased flood risk with urbanisation in Parliament during his budget speech this year. He pointed out that according to the expert panel which came up with the report published in January 2012, it did not say that large scale rapid urbanisation is the key contributor to the recent increase in flooding in Singapore. Instead, it said urbanization has led to an increase in storm water run-off which is what needs to be addressed. This is similar to what Dr Balakrishnan said in his comment after yesterday’s flood.

However, the report, titled, “Report on Key Conclusions and Recommendations of the Expert Panel on Drainage Design and Flood Protection Measures” , also said:

“The Panel was in general agreement that the increased urbanisation in the Stamford Canal Catchment might have been a contributing factor to the 2010 and 2011 floods, in addition to the higher rainfall intensities compared to design levels.”

“The Panel also noted that, other than generating higher and faster surface run-off, increased urbanization may also bring about other impacts such as increased heat production, changes in rainfall patterns and other climate change impacts. However, these specific impacts are still not well understood and there is a need for further studies.”

It would thus seem that the association or relationship between increased urbanization and flooding may be a real one, and not just some myth cooked up by conspiracy theorists.

With the recent announcements of a slew of major development works in the years ahead, we should pay more attention to what the experts have said – before it is too late.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hall: Travesty or inspiration?

~by: Ng Yi-Sheng~ For some bizarre reason, I recently found myself on…

Teacher at PAP Community Foundation Sparkletots centre confirmed with COVID-19

On Monday (23 March), 54 new COVID-19 cases were reported, and 48…

受中美贸易紧张影响 新加坡芯片业首当其冲恐裁员

据路透社报导,新加坡一些芯片和半导体业者向该社反应,受中美贸易战、对中国华为的政治关切以及消费者需求放缓等因素影响,新加坡芯片生产商已开始放慢生产速度,并裁减数百个工作岗位。 该报导指芯片制造业,在去年占新加坡制造业产出(output)的近三分之一。该行业的下滑,也强化了对于新加坡未来数月可能陷入衰退的预期。 新加坡被视为仰赖出口的经济体和经济风向标。长期以来,芯片生产也是新加坡成功的核心要素之一,而许多全球最大的芯片制造商,也在我国运营。我国生产的微芯片,被用在手机到汽车等广泛领域。 “为最差情况做准备” 新加坡半导体工业协会Ang Wee Seng(SSIA)执行董事Ang Wee Seng告诉路透社,认为来临的低迷与以往不同,他们也在为最差情况做好准备,并让员工处于待命状态,以帮助失业的工人找到新工作。 联合科技(UTAC)是以新加坡为总部的公司,业务包括测试和组装芯片。该公司总裁约翰尼尔逊(John Nelson)告诉路透社,已经在新加坡启动“整合进程”(consolidation process),可能导致年底前裁员10-20巴仙。…

严抨扣押欠费清寒子弟成绩单之举 网上联署抗议放眼获千人支持

日前,清寒子弟欠费成绩单遭扣押一事闹得沸沸扬扬,事情被爆出后引起多人议论,大部分人批评教育部的做法,还有人发起联署,要求教育部改善措施。 三日前,网友Terence Tan在发起联署表示抗议教育部有关措施,联署表达了许多人也有同感,认为学校证书、成绩单和其他成就都足以见证了经营价值观,它们象征着个人的进步,对孩子们起了相当重要的作用。 对此,他们教育部在不追究欠费原因下而扣押成绩单的作法,表示不认同。联署表示,由于欠费并非巨款,对于国家开支并未有任何影响,但长久而言,它却表明了国家对于平等机会的信念。 因此,站在教育部的立场,联署反对教育部以此当作“教育”的理念,除了对孩子的自尊留下深刻印象,更是将他们的父母带来了没有能力或无法依赖的印象,这样的做法对子女的发展并没有太大帮助。 最后,联署认为孩子的教育并非只有知识和技能的展现,应包括他们的社会经验、与政府的关系等等的标准与期待,也是孩子教育发展重要的部分。教育部应将孩子的自我价值感、生活技能、身心发展与学术纳入教育的部分,因此欠费的判断不应单单由教育部来决定,更是容纳各项考量,将判断留给新加坡社会及家庭发展部(MSF)的政府机构,已作出正确的选择。 截至目前,已有363人响应,而且数目持续在上升中,发起人表示,对于公众的反映热烈表示感谢,并希望在明天之前能够达到1000人,并在这周前完成5000人的目标。 此前,针对清寒子弟在没有缴清学费的情况底下,将成绩单扣押一事,教育部的回应是指此举用意在于强化家长的责任,并呼吁家长共同承担和正视义务,不管这些费用多小。 对此,民主党主席淡玛亚也站出来质问教育部,父母的问题必须连带孩子受到惩罚,此举是否妥当。 失业者互助网站 Transitioning.org创办人吴家和更是致函至教育部长王乙康,敦促政府应尽早做好改善措施。