Amidst the number of future initiatives unveiled by PM Lee Hsien Loong during his National Day Rally speech was the plan to upgrade Changi Airport.

Besides the building of two new terminals, the literal jewel in the crown would be the new gardens built at the current carpark site next to Terminal 1.

In his speech, PM Lee credited his father, former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, for having the foresight to move the civilian airport from its previous location in Paya Lebar to Changi, where the airport has since thrived and become internationally renowned.

PM Lee said:

“And we have Changi Airport today because in the 1970s, forty years ago, Mr Lee Kuan Yew had the vision to imagine the old RAF Changi Airbase becoming an international airport to replace Paya Lebar and he pushed for it against the advice of experts who recommended expanding Paya Lebar, building a second runway in Paya Lebar. Can you imagine? One runway in Paya Lebar, already aeroplanes coming in and going out over so many houses. (What more) two runways in Paya Lebar?

“But Mr Lee said no, study, study, study again. Got Howe Yoon Choon [sic] to lead it who pushed it and made it happened. And I think we owe it to them and we are grateful to them.”

This statement applauding the senior Lee’s foresight must have reinforced his position as the visionary leader and father of modern Singapore. While his many contributions to the development of modern day Singapore are without a doubt invaluable, I was unsure if moving the airport from Paya Lebar to Changi was his brainchild, and that Howe Yoon Choong, the former Defence Minister, was merely taking instructions from Mr Lee.

Mr Howe’s pivotal role in the matter was reiterated and honoured in 2012 and 2013, by a minister and by the Changi Airpot Group, respectively.

In a speech – in May 2013 – by former minister Lim Boon Heng at the 5th Howe Yoon Chong PSA Scholarship Award Ceremony, he lauds Mr How Yoon Choong as a decisive man who worked based on strong convictions:

“Mr Howe Yoon Chong also played a pivotal role in the development of Changi Airport.

“Back in 1975, Mr Howe had the foresight to push for a new airport to be built at Changi rather than to follow expert opinion to expand the existing airport at Paya Lebar with a second runway. The land at Changi was reclaimed from the sea, an international terminal built from scratch, and the new airport began operations on schedule in July 1981.

“Again, the younger generation of Singaporeans will face this kind of decisions to be made, whether to make that move, because it’s a lot of money, and if that move proves wrong, you lose a lot of money. But Mr Howe was certain that it was right and he pushed for it and he convinced then-Prime Minister Mr Lee Kuan Yew.And from personal experience, if anybody wants to convince Mr Lee Kuan Yew, you’ve got to be very strong in your convictions and sure of yourself.”

So, according to Mr Lim’s version of the story, it was Mr Howe who should be credited with having the foresight to move the airport to Changi from Paya Lebar. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, in fact, did not seem to be for the idea and apparently had to be convinced otherwise.

Mr Howe’s pioneering role in the matter was also honoured in 2012 by the Changi Airport Group, when it launched the CAG-Howe Yoon Chong (CAG-HYC) Book Prize, a support programme under the Changi Foundation.

The Group’s press release said:

“As we mark the completion of the upgrading for T1, we fondly remember Mr Howe, a pioneer of Changi, for his spirit of true grit in surmounting difficult and challenging circumstances.  Despite the views of experts, Mr Howe determined that Changi Airport was doable within the timeframe set.  As it turned out, his assessment proved to be an astute and accurate one.”

What transpired and who actually was responsible for the establishment of Changi Aiport is a confounding one, given the apparent different accounts.

What is perhaps certain is that Mr Howe played a more pivotal role than just taking instructions from Mr Lee Kuan Yew to “study, study, study again.” Mr Howe, in fact, pushed for the airport to be moved to Changi.

This then raises a number of questions: Have we Singaporeans become conditioned to credit Mr Lee Kuan Yew for every Singaporean success story by default, neglecting the efforts of the rest of the old guard? Are we taking everything our national leaders say to be infallible and always accurate?

Perhaps historians could shed some further light on how Changi Airport came about?

“Whether we have been extravagant in investing in an airport of this size and level of sophistication is a question worthy of a rhetorical rejoinder. Can Singapore ever afford not to have such an airport?”
Howe Yoon Chong, then Minister of Defence on the official opening of Changi Airport on in1981.

This article was contributed via the Readers’ Contribution under the moniker “Tau Huay”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Online users fully support WP Chief’s call for more opposition representation to check on ruling party

While speaking at the Workers’ Party Member’s Forum 2020 on Sunday (19…

直销“套路”鹿胎素有治癌疗效 卫生科学局证“绝无此事”

卫生科学局(HSA)点名警告保健直销公司力汇国际(Riway International),禁止该公司对消费者宣传旗下保健食品有治愈癌症的误导信息。 根据《海峡时报》报道,卫生科学局日前发现,力汇国际的最近主打产品Purtier鹿胎盘素(Purtier Placenta)在推销过程,宣称产品是以鹿胎素提炼,是一种干细胞治疗方案,透过摄入药丸便能达其治疗效果。 卫生科学局发言人对此表示,目前仍在调查中。 “对于提供误导信息的产品,一旦发现有任何违反法律的行为,我们将严格采取法律行动,厂商若被发现有夸大、过度宣传或谎报药效的行为,会有被检控之虞,一旦罪成,可能会面临最高两年的监禁或被罚款最高5000新元” 直销商宣称治疗严重疾病效果佳,出现误导信息 自2017年1月起,消费者协会已陆续收到6起有关产品的投诉案件,其中3三起案件以产品含误导信息向协会投诉。 《海峡时报》指出,直销商宣称许多身患癌症、哮喘或中风的严重疾病者在服用该产品后得到好转,而该公司的收入也因产品的好销量而从2009年300万美元营收增至2017年40亿美元营收,以此向消费者证明产品的良好药效。 卫生科学局强调,针对主打干细胞治疗方案的医疗产品,民众需特别谨慎,他表示,“截至目前仍未有有力的科学证据,证明活细胞治疗方案的有效性。” “与此同时,并无任何医学证明口服干细胞能够预防或治疗疾病的证据。基本上,当我们将干细胞服用后,胰脏内的酶素只会将干细胞破坏而已,无法产生任何疗效。” “未有科学证明”…

Singaporeans react to AGO findings of Mindef’s $50 million investments on American properties

By Chen Guojun Last January, Mindef invested S$50.26 million in a United…