(Photo: LGBT rights activists outside the Russian Embassy in Singapore. From left to right: Zan Thang, Jolovan Wham, Vincent Wijeysingha, Leow Yangfa.)

Officials of the Russian embassy in Singapore have refused to accept a petition signed by 200 members of the LGBT community and their supporters when four activists visited the embassy premises on Friday morning, 11am Singapore time. Instead, the embassy called the police and the activists were interviewed for almost an hour before the police left the scene.

The petition was signed at an event last Saturday (24 August), ‘To Russia with Love’, held at Hong Lim Park as one of a series of activities organised by Indignation, Singapore’s annual LGBT pride festival. (See coverage of event)

‘To Russia with Love’ was organised in response to the Russian parliament’s adoption of legislation banning the dissemination of information on “non-traditional” sexuality. The authorities there claims that the law will protect children and young people from information and propaganda that are harmful to their well-being and development. There has also been an increase in the number of violent incidents, assaults, harassment and bullying of members of the Russian LGBT community and their allies since the passing of this law. At least two people havebeen reported to have died as a result of homophobic attacks in Russia. 1

“This small act will not change the mind of the Russian government,” Vincent Wijeysingha, the first S’porean politician to declare he is gay, said, referring to the Singaporean activists’ visit to the Russian embassy. “But it should be left in no doubt that people the world over hold it in contempt.”

Last week, the Singaporean activists requested a meeting with the Russian embassy to deliver the petition. The Head of the Consular Section, Bulat Dondukov, replied with this message:

“The Embassy has received and considered your request for a meeting with an Embassy official with the purpose of submitting a petition from Singapore’s LGBT community.

We believe that your protest is prompted by gross misconception and is ill-advised. You have misconstrued developments in Russia.

First of all, we want to remind that discrimination of any minority is legally prohibited in Russia by the Constitution. Unlike the former Soviet Union homosexual behaviour is not punishable by the Criminal Code. The recently adopted law has one well-defied purpose – to ban promotion of homosexuality among minors, but not “promotion of homosexuality”, as you claim. The law prohibits promotion in aggressive forms of non-traditional sexual practices among minors.

Law enforcement officers now have the right to detain persons who violate the law intentionally (for example, by conducting public actions near schools and other children institutions). And last, but not least: violation of this law is an administrative, not criminal, offence.”

In a joint statement, the four activists said

‘We have been pressing the bell outside the embassy for the last thirty minutes and obviously nobody is coming out to receive us even though they have just let the newspaper man in. So clearly, they are ignoring us which is rather telling, because Putin appears to be a tough man in his own country but his representatives abroad don’t even have the courage to come out to accept nothing more dangerous than a letter. So, we will leave the letter here and go away, but we would like to tell our LGBT friends in Russia from here in Singapore that we support you, and this is done in friendship across the many miles.’

Russia will host the Winter Olympics next year and its government has banned demonstrations and rallies in the city of Sochi where the games will be held, in a move that has been denounced by rights activists.

1) Russia homophobic murder: Two detained after man is beaten and tortured to death in anti-gay attack in VolgogradGay man killed in Russia’s second suspected hate crime in weeks

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

从乔立盟典范 检视“高薪方能揽才”迷思

长期以来执政党人民行动党的想法,即我们需要“高薪养廉”,出高薪才能吸引人才、杜绝贪腐。因此,我们的高级公务员和部长都需要支付以高薪。而上周本地五位市长宣誓就职,亦有领取高薪(据2017年的薪资探讨报告,市长年薪约为66万元)。 当然,没有人会质疑市长为社会作出的贡献,问题是,他们是否值得支付这么多的薪水?此外,当选的议员是否能够履行职责。毕竟,公共服务才是他们最重要的职责。 近日,人民党主席乔立盟,却为我们树立了没有高薪也能服务选民的好榜样。他在脸书上呼吁波东巴西的失业居民,透过自己的网站寄出履历,而且他自己也将与开发商合作,创造一个互助的市场,让有需要的居民能够获得相关捐赠。 从乔立盟的立意而言,我们需知,他的所作所为出自自愿。他并非是当地的民选议员,也没有支付任何薪资,但却愿意投入自己的时间和精力来帮助新加坡人。 这样的例子与人民行动党的理念背道而驰,即需高薪支付公务人员,方能把事情做好一事。 承上所述,重点在于进入公共服务的人不应为高薪而来。虽然,所有的工作都应该付以相应的薪资报酬,但我们必须从中取得平衡。相比高薪的市长,乔立盟的榜样是否能让人们稍作停顿,重新思考人民行动党以“薪“为主的论述? 值得注意的是,乔立盟在本次大选中,仍不敌人民行动党的司徒宇斌。虽然他输了这场竞选,却依旧继续为波东巴西的人民努力,无条件地帮助他们。 尽管有人对他的行为嗤之以鼻,嘲讽他是为了下次大选做准备,但他起码没有把一切当作理所当然。他理解人民对自己工作的担忧,因此积极地为人民创造机会缓解他们的担心。 当然,没有人能够确保他在未来能够成功当选,毕竟对反对党而言,新加坡的政治环境是一场艰苦的战斗。 那些已习惯(或期待)高薪才能服务民众的人,当他们的薪资受到威胁,兴许无意间会发现他们啥都干不了。毕竟,国家与人民行动党之间的界限仍然非常模糊,除非有强大的反对党在国会中,这一界限才会明确。 我们有必要重新检视“高薪养廉”这个根深蒂固的信念。

马外长:马新水供仍可谈 惟外交部重申尊重原协议

马来西亚外交部长拿督赛夫丁阿都拉于本周一(30日)到访狮城,拜会总统哈莉玛、总理李显龙和外交部长维文,表达马新合作、加强双边关系意愿。 此次拜访,也被视作马国新政府成立后,正式拜会我国,并针对一些主要课题如两国合作议程、马新高铁、马新水供等课题,进行初步照会。 赛夫丁向马国官方媒体马新社(Bernama)透露,马新水供协议仍可进行检讨。他认为,1962年马新水供协议,双方可在签署后的25年检讨,并不代表在第25年才能检讨条款,因此新马双方可继续讨论协议内容。 他说,在会面时,我国总理李显龙也主动询问马方在水供协议和马新高铁的立场,而他则尽量阐明,令我国明白当前马国面对的情况。 赛夫丁补充,经济部长阿兹敏已在7月23日针对马新高铁计划展延,致函新加坡,相信很快就会展开会谈。 在6月22日,马国首相敦马在接受彭博社专访时,曾提及马新水供水价“荒谬”,有意重新协商水价。 赛夫丁相信,上述两件课题,并不会影响两国友好关系。 外交部长维文也在脸书贴文,欢迎赛夫丁与夫人到访。他说,两国盘点了新马合作项目,并对新的契机交换意见。他也期待两国部长和官员继续互访。 维文伉俪也设午宴招待赛夫丁和夫人拿汀诺林及马方代表团。较后,赛夫丁也拜会我国副总理兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤。 外交部重申:双方不能单方面更改条款 虽然赛夫丁提及,马新都能针对水供协议提出新提案,但是外交部于7月31日发文告重申,对于1962年马新水供协议,新加坡立场与7月9日发出的声明一致,即马新两国必须尊重先前顶下的国际协议,双方都不能单方面更改条款。 “马来西亚在1987年,选择不调整水价,认为他们仍在协议中获益。”…

Ezbuy.sg gives account on stoppage of service for Taobao purchases

Ezbuy.sg, Singapore’s first and largest global shopping platform*, issued a press release on…