By Choo Zheng Xi/Co-Founder, TOC

newzealand
Closeup shot of the newspapers – Andrew Low

This morning, my eyes nearly popped out of my skull when I read in the ST that Minister for Communications and Information (MCI) had compared the MDA Licensing Regime to recommendations made by a New Zealand (NZ) Law Commission Report on new media.

This is an embarrassing example for Dr Yaacob Ibrahim to use, and shows how desperate his Ministry is becoming to grasp at any fig leaf of legitimacy to justify their Licensing Regime.

In fact, Dr Yaacob’s example is so misguided and confused that one has to wonder whether or not he has actually read the report. New Zealanders would certainly be shocked to discover how he has interpreted the findings of the report.

The report referenced by Dr Yaacob to prove his misguided point is the NZ Law Commission’s Report titled “The News Media Meets ‘New Media’: Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation in the Digital Age”.

Dr Yaacob says of this report: “The bottom line is that (the New Zealanders) now see that even the media can operate contrary to the public interest, and they need a regulator to ensure that this does not happen…They have also recognised the need for any regulator to oversee both traditional and online media”.

Dr Yaacob has glossed over critical differences between the findings of the New Zealand law Commission Report and MCI’s Licensing Regime.

When these differences are examined up close, any sensible reader will realise that Dr Yaacob’s New Zealand example actually proves precisely why his Licensing Regime is not the way to go.

Did Dr Yaacob read the NZ Law Commission Report?

In summary, these are the critical differences in the NZ Law Commission Report which Dr Yaacob has ignored.

1)     The New Zealand report recommends a voluntary new media standards body for online news. This body is to be known as the News Media Standards Authority (NMSA). Participation in the NMSA is to be by way of  contract, and not compulsory.

The MDA Licensing Regime is going to be compulsory, with no opt out option, and includes a $50,000 “performance bond”;

2)     The NMSA is, in the words of the NZ Law Commission Report, supposed to be “genuinely independent of Government and the news media industry.

The chairperson is to be a retired judge or an experienced and well known public figure appointed by the Chief Ombudsman (a public official whose sole role is to be an independent check on the government).

A majority of the NMSA will be drawn from members of the public who are independent of the media industry with a minority drawn from former members of the media.

This is clearly different from Dr Yaacob’s Licensing Regime, which is to be regulated by MDA, which is a government agency;

3)     The consultative and open manner in which the New Zealand report was constructed, debated and adopted puts Dr Yaacob’s Ministry to shame.

In the first place, the NZ Law Commission set up to make the recommendations was independent, publicly funded commission staffed by serving Judges, former Judges, and eminent lawyers.

The NZ Law Commission consulted widely and solicited views and opinions from members of industry, the legal fraternity, bloggers, commercial news agencies, and the public at large before formulating their recommendations.

The recommendations were then forwarded to the Government in the form of a Ministerial Briefing Paper.

These recommendations were then tabled and then debated in Parliament.

Compare this to the situation in Singapore, where even Members of Parliament were not asked to scrutinize the Licensing Regime, and Cabinet Ministers are clearly unprepared to defend the indefensible Licensing Regime.

Time for Hong Lim

In the days to come, Dr Yaacob is likely going to have to walk his comments back because of his selective and misguided portrayal of the NZ Law Commission report.

To draw such a comparison is an insult to our friends from New Zealand, and to the intelligence of the ordinary Singaporean.

Dr Yaacob’s approach highlights precisely why Singaporeans need to turn up at Hong Lim Park this Saturday: to get a clear view of the facts about regulations that will affect your lives and the information you consume.

You May Also Like

Let’s not be too “smart” for our own good.

Reading a description of the future of Singapore, starting with the ambitious…

人力部:客工复工前 需下载“合力追踪”手机程序

日前,政府宣布将在本月19日实施第二阶段解封,许多公共活动和领域也逐渐开放,其中包括客工宿舍和学校。 据人力部昨日(16日)文告指出,随着愈来愈多客工宿舍被列为“安全宿舍”,许多客工也准备返回工作岗位,对此人力部规定客工必须下载追踪应用程式“合力追踪”(TraceTogether),追踪客工的记录。 除了客工宿舍,在建筑、船舶和加工制造业领域工作,工作准证和特别准证(S Pass)持有者,也需要下载追踪应用程式。 人力部于上月27日已宣布上述消息,于本月16日发出最后提醒,要求客工必须下载追踪应用程式,最后截止日期是在本周五下午五点前。 与此同时,建设局与人力部也提醒雇主必须遵守条例,获准重返工作岗位的客工也可以透过SGWorkPass的应用程式查看最新状态,若程式上显示绿色代表已获准复工,而红色则仍未获准复工。

“Weaponised German surveillance malware” purchased by S’pore company: Wikileaks

In a Wikileaks media release on 15 September, a Singapore company is…

福布斯公布新加坡50大富豪榜 海底捞集团创始人张勇成狮城首富

美国《福布斯》杂志公布最新新加坡50大富豪榜,中国人气火锅连锁店海底捞集团创始人之一张勇,从此前的第三名跻身新加坡首富之位。 此前,新加坡首富之位由新加坡房地产发展商远东机构(Far East Organization)黄志祥和黄志达兄弟担任,身家(净资产)为121亿美元。不过如今由张勇以138亿美元身家(净资产)登上榜首。 张勇今年49岁,来自中国四川简阳,他和妻子舒萍是在去年五月成为新加坡公民 目前,新加坡10大富豪排名如下: 海底捞集团创始人张勇(138亿美元) 黄志祥和黄志达兄弟(21亿美元) 脸书联合创办人萨维林(Eduardo Saverin)(106亿美元) 油漆大亨吴清亮(95亿美元) 丰隆集团主席郭令明(88亿美元)…