We refer to the MDA’s comments in The Straits Times today. The comments state that TOC does not, at present, meet the new licensing requirements for online news sites announced yesterday.

MDA’s failure to explain application of licensing criteria

MDA’s statement fails to explain why the requirements do not apply to TOC at present, while hinting obliquely that they could apply to the website in the future.

Our internal statistics, a screenshot of which is attached, indicate that we meet the visitorship requirement for licensing. The nature of our coverage appears to fall within MDA’s second requirement for licensing.

tocstats_cloudflare

MDA’s failure to explain how it’s new policy is to be applied at present suggest that the manner in which it is being introduced is opaque and arbitrary, and does not give Singaporeans confidence in its clear application in the future.

TOC, as a largely volunteer run enterprise, cannot afford to labour under such continued legal uncertainty. The legal black hole we will be forced to operate in will hamstring our ability to recruit new volunteers.The licensing regime, if applied to volunteer run socio-political websites like TOC, will effectively cripple us. While the S$50,000 performance bond is a drop in the ocean for a mainstream news outlet with an online presence, it would potentially be beyond our means to raise.Hence, MDA’s claim that these regulations are intended to equalize the playing field between online and offline news is incorrect.

The opposite is true: the regulations will have a disproportionate and unequal impact on volunteer run websites like ours and effectively impair our ability to continue operating.

We call on MDA to provide much needed clarity on its new regulations, and to defer their implementation until such clarity is provided.

Call for full Parliamentary debate

Separately, we call on the Ministry of Communications and Information to table the licensing regime for a full debate in Parliament and to defer the implementation of the licensing regime.

It is not appropriate for Singaporeans’ constitutionally protected right to freedom of speech to be sweepingly curtailed by a regulating authority without any public consultation or oversight by our democratically elected legislature.

 

Choo Zheng Xi: Co-Founder, Consultant Editor
Terry Xu: Executive Editor
Howard Lee: Deputy Chief Editor
Lee Song Kwang: Core Team Member, Treasurer

You May Also Like

职总平价推出”流动超市” 方便五社区年长者购物

职总平价宣布,从今日(23日)起将在本地五个社区提供“流动超市”(FairPrice On Wheels)服务,方便年长者无需离开社区太远就能买到必需品。 根据职总平价今日发布的贴文,流动超市将在每日早上9时至2时提供服务,售卖的商品包括米、食油、蔬果、罐头食品、盥洗用品、面包等必需品。 该服务涵盖的区域包括联邦连路、直落布兰雅弯、直落布兰雅坡、甘榜格南民众俱乐部和惹兰固哥(Jalan Kukoh)一带。

总理称关注香港局势进展 “示威抗议不可能持续下去”

李显龙总理日前接受彭博社总编辑米思伟(John Micklethwait)采访。针对美国当选总统拜登、中美关系、新加坡疫情和经济等,发表看法。 本月12日,香港民主党议员集体辞职。米思伟特别抛出此议题,试探李显龙对于香港局势的立场。米思伟指多数人认为,上述议员辞职事件,被解读为对香港自由的打压。 “新加坡作为民主国家,你又如何看待香港目前的情况呢?”米思伟如是问道。 李显龙则指新加坡政府密切关注香港局势进展,认为“一些事将发生,是无可避免的”,他指示威和抗议行为不可能无限持续下去,也不可能延续到2047年(一国两制期限结束)。 他也指,中国政府已明确表态,透过人民代表大会立法,而香港政府也已贯彻执行这些新条例。 人大常委会上周三(11日)通过一项涉港决定,内容涉及立法会议员的资格问题,不符合资格者,将由港府宣布取消议席;港府随后依据有关决定,宣布取消四名泛民议员的资格。 彭博社报导指上述条例形同中国“扼杀异议”的最新举措,也引发人们对香港未来的担忧,包括会否引来美国制裁香港或中国政府高层。 不过,李显龙则指希望中国政府能在不影响国际社会的信心下,解决香港问题,同时维持香港体制,作为中国有价值、繁荣区域的一部分。 李显龙认为,香港不会回到原来状态,但希望她能适应“新局势”,建设可持续发展的未来,让港人安居乐业、经济重回正轨。

More University Graduates and Undergraduates prefer the Private Sector

Over 50% favour a career in the private sector, an increase of…