By Cheong Yaoming ~

Rather than give a chronology of events that happened, which can be found in almost every mainstream media piece, I will attempt to address certain rumours and myths, backed up by events witnessed on the ground and online.

Myth: The Workers' Party supporters are always more fired up.

One charted bus and a mini-van carrying white rolled up flags and middle aged people dressed in white first arrived around 10.30am. The PAP supporters seemed coy about being present.

"Are you here to support the PAP?" I asked one of them.

"No…I just happen to be in the area…"

"But you're carrying a white PAP flag!"

"Is it a PAP flag? I don't think so…"

"Yes I can see part of the blue logo with the red lightning bolt!"

The awkward silence that followed was deafening, so I raised my white flag and headed over to the people dressed in blue. Their numbers grew with each passing minute and the buzz of excitement they generated was growing as well. When a blue lorry carrying wooden placards and bundles of red furled up flags arrived, a huge cheer erupted from the WP supporters.

While waiting for the nominees to be confirmed by the Elections department, the WP supporters sporadically broke out in chants of "Workers' Party! Workers Party!" and even mixing it up with "Ole ole ole ole". Even with a foghorn, the PAP supporters' chants of "Hougang! Desmond Choo!" were often drowned out by the WP supporters

Conclusion: Myth confirmed

Myth: Singaporeans are not easily satisfied.

It was no mean feat trying to upload photos on the TOC Facebook, post live updates of newsworthy events, get quotes and reactions on the ground – all at the same time. I was trying my best to meet the demand for content by our readers. While some of you may have the luxury of sitting in front of a computer, the TOC team, comprising of mostly of unpaid volunteers who just do not have the same resources available compared to the mainstream media, braved the elements and the odds to meet the high expectations of our readers.

Yes the quality of some photos could have been better and mistakes were made while reporting (Hokkein and Teochew do sound quite similar) but deriding the efforts of the TOC team was unfair as we tried our best on the shoestring resources that we had.

Conclusion: Plausible. I was heartened by the advice, encouragement and even offers to help of some TOC readers, we greatly appreciate such readers and will use their positive feedback as a catalyst to improve.

Myth: PAP politicians are automatons bad at interacting with 'mere mortals'.

Despite my initial encounter with that 'may-or-may-not-be' PAP supporter, I soldiered on and was determined to tell the PAP's side of the story as well. As I forged into 'enemy' territory, I did not feel the eyes of hundereds of PAP supporters dressed in white burning holes in me even though I stuck out like a sore thumb dressed in black.

Minister Khaw Boon Wan shook my hand firmly and warmly thanked me for coming down the support the PAP. Even though he mistook me for a PAP supporter I felt there was a change in engagement through his actions. His bodyguards were not overly protective and did not form a protective barricade; instead they were casually trailing behind him.

Conclusion: Myth busted

Myth: The Workers' Party had Dr Poh Lee Guan as their secret back up nominee.

"We were not informed of his intention to contest in advance" said Mr Low to the press gaggle. Just like everyone else, the Workers' Party was caught off guard by Dr Poh's actions when TOC first broke the story yesterday morning.

While conspiracy theories and speculation will continue to be circulated, we will follow up with developments very carefully and not jump to conclusions until facts have been established.

Conclusion: Myth busted

Myth: What is Mr Png Eng Huat's strategy? Does he have one? 

Very focused in defending Hougang with a low key no frills campaign lots of walkabouts, house visits, basically he will cover as much of Hougang as he can within the next 9 days. Rather than dictating which issues were important, Mr Png would be listening to and letting residents bring forward issues which matter to them. 

So is the Hougang by-election local or national?

Mr Png said "I view Hougang as a very important constituency…lots of upgrading were thrown at Hougang to the tune of $100 million but the residents rejected it because they wanted a voice in Parliament. That is special and I don't think you can find it anywhere else."

I then posed the question "What message do you have for residents that are undecided on who to vote for?" He said “Give me a chance to serve you to the best of my ability.” That's a campaign slogan right there.

Conclusion: Myth busted. 

TOC thanks Sebastian Song for allowing us the use of his photos.

Video of Nomination Day for By-election in Hougang (2012) 

This article is published by The Online Citizen, 20 Maxwell Road, #09-17 Maxwell House, Singapore 069113.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

NTUC Foodfare on discontented hawkers: Nothing to stop them to operate in NEA hawker centres

Yesterday, Vulcanpost.com published an interview it had with NTUC Foodfare CEO Perry…

【冠状病毒19】斯里兰卡籍男囚 刑满待遣返时确诊

卫生发布在本月3日公布,一名持短期探访准证(Short-Term Visit Pass)的斯里兰卡籍囚犯确诊。 移民与关卡局和监狱署则补充资讯,这名囚犯是在1月2日抵达新加坡,但在6月30日,因逾期逗留被捕。7月6日,被判监禁四周。 与其他新囚犯一样,上述男子入狱前同样需隔离14天和接受检测,结果呈阴性。 7月8日,男子感染骨痛热症,到樟宜综合医院时还有再接受冠病检测,结果呈阴性。他在13日就回到樟宜监狱中心、22日检测,结果仍是阴性,这期间仍是与其他囚犯隔离开来。 男子刑满后在27日移交移民关卡局关押,准备遣返。28日,他到邱德拔医院复诊。 由于目前未有往斯里兰卡航班,7月30日这名男囚又被送回监狱署。不过他在接受拭子检测时才发现确诊。 一名监狱署官员、五名移民局官员和五名辅警,因曾接触这名男囚,需遵守隔离令。

2019年社会进步指数 基本需求新加坡得分高 个人权益、环境素质及包容度待改善

根据美国非营利组织Social Progress Imperative公布《2019年社会进步指数(SocialProgress Index, SPI)》报告,新加坡在满足人民基本需求如营养和基本医疗保健上,取得最高分。 不过,在个人权益、环境素质和社会包容性等事项,被指有待改善。 在2019年社会进步指数中评估的149个国家,新加坡排名第27,整体得分83.23,比去年首次被纳入调查的排名下滑了四个位置,但仍领先其他东南亚国家。 不过位居榜首前三名国家,则是挪威、丹麦和瑞士。芬兰、瑞典、冰岛、纽西兰、德国、加拿大和日本则位列前十。 2019年社会进步指数是在上月公布,从51项指标:营养、安全、个人权益和包容度等衡量各国。 我国在满足营养、医疗护理等基本需求方面,取得将近满分的98.39分。在饮用水供应和卫生设施方面也取得满分。 然而,在个人个人权益、包容性方面,则被指有待加强。个人权益方面在149国排名仅88名,政治权益、表达意见自由和诉求公义等得分,也同样表现欠佳。 至于环境素质方面,得分68.35,排名72名;而包容度方面表现最差,得分52.32,排名56。有关指标涵括对少数群体是否存有歧视、性别、社会经济地位和社会群体在政治地位的平等,以及对性少数群体的接纳程度。…

探讨异议课程遭耶鲁-国大学院腰斩 亚菲言:异议就是说不的艺术

“如果我们就连腾出空间去倾听那些说不的人,也做不到,那么民主已死。” 据报导,耶鲁—国大学院临时取消一门名为《新加坡的异议与抵抗》的课程。有关课程将由新加坡知名剧作家亚菲言(Alfian Sa’at),与参与学生探讨本土的公民抗命模式。 有关课程原本计划在本月27日至10月5日进行,结果在开课前两周就被喊停。耶鲁—国大学院校长陈大荣教授,则在受询时向媒体解释,课程“未批判性地接触多元观点,这对于探讨围绕在异议周边的政治、社会和伦理议题,去做作妥当的学术检视是需要的”。 他续指,有关课程建议的活动和选取的讲员,也有损该校不把政党政治利益带入校园的承诺。 他也指出一些活动建议包括“可能使学生面临违法风险、或面对法律责任的元素”。 课程原本由本地剧作家亚菲言和课程经理Tan Yock Theng负责。 亚菲言对于本地时政课题向来有话直说,他著作的诗歌、剧作和短片等,也常触碰诸如政治、性别和族群等议题。 课程活动之一,包括观看独立制片人苏德祥制作“光谱行动”纪录片《1987解开阴谋》(1987: Untracing…