~By: Jen~

I am very disturbed by the new Edusave Character Award scheme by the Ministry of Education to reward good character in students with hard cold cash. This award according to MOE’s Minister Heng Swee Keat, is to recognise students who exhibit values such as respect and who demonstrate exemplary civic responsibility through their behaviour and actions.

I am all for cultivating good values, but to actually have a scheme to give money to students for doing and being good just goes against the grain of what it means to be a good person. I believe most of us were taught by our parents to be good and to do good not for reward, but because, it is good for us and society in general. Isn’t this a universal principle?

Yet, now we have this pay-money-for-good-behaviour scheme. What exactly were our education minister and the ministry thinking? What values are they trying to inculcate in our impressionable young? That it literally has to ‘pay’ to do ‘good?’

As it is there are already so many award schemes at schools that pay cash to reward students. The Edusave Awards for Achievement, Good Leadership and Service (Eagles) and bursaries for most improved in school grades (which some kids have learnt to game the system to make money by deliberately doing badly in first half of the year).

I believe using reward as a motivator can be useful and good, but it cannot be the easy way out and cash should not be used in certain situations. Whatever happened to the good old days when reward meant getting a good book? Okay, maybe not a book in today’s internet age, but surely MOE can come out with more creative ways of motivation than just cash.

One cannot help, but wonder, if there is a political agenda behind the Edusave Character Award scheme that comes post-haste after GE2011. Based on Mr Heng’s comments in Parliament, he said such a scheme is not just to drive home the importance of character building among the young but it is to “ultimately, prepare them for a world of unknowns… It is more about how to process information, discern truths from untruths, connect seemingly disparate dots and create knowledge even as the context changes…”

Read Mr Heng’s quote again and one wonders how to connect the disparate dots between what he said with the new character building award. If one were to read between the lines or dots, it sounds like it may be part of a plan to mold young minds in a certain way so that it is aligned with the thinking of the PAP’s values. Shape the young so they can be “reasonable” and “speak with reason” in line with their definition of reasoning and make sure the kids here do not grow up to be the vocal “lunatic fringe”?

It will be interesting to know what criterion is used by MOE to judge if a student has good character and values. Will it be considered good character if a student is an activist who criticises a government policy because he or she views it as questionable and detrimental to the people? One wonders.

Despite all the initial signs shown by the PAP during GE2011 that they will try to be more understanding and open-minded, some of their actions post GE like introducing this Edusave Character Scheme leaves a bad taste in the mouth. This scheme is regressive as it smacks of political manipulation to shape young minds and teaches the wrong values of paying cash to reward good behaviour. As it is, Singaporeans are already being accused of being too money minded and here they go teaching our young the wrong values. Seriously, what is our government thinking?

 


This article first appeared on Jentrified Citizen. We thank Jen for allowing us to reproduce it here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

WP chair Sylvia Lim: Heng Swee Keat not necessarily “charismatic”, but can demonstrate competence in other ways

“Charismatic” may not be a term used to describe Deputy Prime Minister…

盼公平解决租赁课题 公平租约工委会呈15建议

业主和租户之间的纠纷一直以来是我国常见的纠纷课题,尤其在冠状病毒爆发后,更有租户遭业主驱赶等课题出现,为此,公平租约工作委员会向政府提出15项建议,包括负责处理不公租赁行为的委员会。 公平租约工作委员会以政府提供的房地产税回扣事件为例,指出尽管政府多次作出呼吁,但是还是有业主不愿将所得的税务回扣,转让给租户。 因此,该委员会提出了15项建议,包括让新加坡竞争与消费者委员会担任监督机构,为零售租金率设立规范计算方式,以及设立委员会等。 其实我国租赁课题一直存在,而当其中更涉及客工时,情况更糟。 日前,新加坡客工组织情义之家(HOME)的个案管理经理Luke Tan也曾分享到,基于人力部加强了管制措施,有些住在店屋的客工被发现他们的房间过于拥挤后,被迫搬出店屋而露宿街头。 留下的客工也也遭到重击,因为房东还试图调涨租金。

Former owner of The Real Singapore voices about discrimination that ex-convicts face in Singapore

On Thursday (29 January), Yang Kaiheng, the ex-owner of socio-political site The…

GE2020 Results: PAP wins Bukit Panjang SMC with 53.74% of the vote

Bukit Panjang SMC has been officially called for People’s Action Party’s (PAP)…