~by: Leong Sze Hian~

I refer to the report “Over S$78m in Medifund aid given to needy in FY2010” (Channel NewsAsia, Mar 12).

It states that “Successful applications also went up by 22 per cent to more than 480,000 in 2010”.

In previous years, the statistics would also say what percentage of Medifund applications was successful. I believe the last reported figure was that about 99 per cent of applications were successful.

However, for this year, I am unable to find any mention of this statistic.

Actually, what is perhaps an even more significant statistic may be – what percentage of patients who applied was unsuccessful? (Note: “Applications are not equivalent to patients. A patient may make multiple applications for each hospitalisation and/or outpatient attendance bill”)

A patient who applies say 12 times in a year would be counted as 12 successful applications. Whereas a patient who is unsuccessful the first time, may never apply again.

Medifund criteria – secret?

What is the criteria for approving Medifund applications?

As I understand it, the only public information that is available in this regard, is that those who cannot pay for their medical bills can apply through the medical provider.

I have been told that to be successful, basically all family members must have hardly any Medisave in their accounts that can be used, have hardly any money in the bank, cannot stay in a 5-room HDB or bigger HDB flat or private property, etc.

I also understand that in order to be admitted to Class C and B2 ward or treatment, which are the only classes whereby Medifund can be used, a patient must be referred by a polyclinic or if the patient has a medical benefits card referral from a private clinic participating in the Primary Care Partnership Scheme (PCPS).

Medifund cannot use for polyclinic?

Medifund also cannot be used for polyclinic out-patient general consultation treatment, such that the medical providers have been raising funds through their own efforts to help such patients who cannot pay.

After writing off $90 million, patients still owe public hospitals $110 million.  

Medifund have surplus?

Despite the above statistics and Medifund use restrictions, $76 million of Medifund unultilised (surplus) has been transferred to the protected reserves. (Note: “The protected reserves comprise accumulated unutilised interest monies that were locked-up at the change-over of Government in December 2001 and May 2006. Authorisation from the President is required before the protected reserves can be used”)

Funds not allocated based on patients' needs?

I am rather puzzled as to why once again, the total assistance given by Medifund-approved institutions (MFIs) to patients formed less than (98%) the Medifund and Medifund Silver grants disbursed by MOH to MFIs in FY10. Utilisation of allocated funds increased compared to FY09. Any unspent funds will be carried over to assist patients in the next financial year.

As I understand it, MOH allocates a grant to each MFI at the beginning of the year for the whole year, and MFIs have to be prudent in ensuring that the grant is sufficent for the whole year. So, it is not based on the needs of patients for the year, but rather like how well the MFI is able to keep within the allocation for the whole year. In such a system, is it any wonder that there is always under-ultilised  funds, as no MFI would want to find itself in a situation whereby there is no money left for needy patients before the year ends?

So, does it mean that total disbursements from Medifund for the year may be more dependent on the interest from the Medifund Endowment Fund, rather than the needs of patients?

Endowment transfers means less Budget surplus?

The Medifund and Medifund Silver Endowment funds now stand at $1,973.3 million, with a capital injection of $200 million last year. In this connection, our Budget surpluses may have been in a sense, under-reported in comparison with other countries, as such transfers are made almost annually to the various endowment funds, like Medifund and the ComCare fund.


Support TOC! Buy Uncle Leong’s book here!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

53 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 49 locally transmitted cases, 19 unlinked

As of Wednesday noon (18 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

六旬病患进食噎着辞世 院方未及时换软食引验尸官关注

一名病患在黄廷方医院拔牙后,牙科医生建议医疗团队为病患准备软食物方便进食。不料病患仍食入普通餐,结果噎着而昏迷,不久即辞世。 上述个案发生于去年一月底。在昨日就辞世病患死因展开的研讯,验尸官马文德对于医疗团队并没有立即执行牙医建议,为病患更换软食表示关注。 据《海峡时报》报导,去年1月11日,因为腰部及膝盖剧烈疼痛致不能行走,67岁的病患Simon Lee被救护车送往黄廷方医院接受治疗。 医生诊断Simon Lee患有链球菌菌血症(streptococcus bacteremia),怀疑病情是因为口腔问题造成,要他住院治疗。 医院的牙科顾问医生在1月16日检查病患口腔,决定为他拔出三颗严重蛀牙的牙齿。病患在拔牙后只剩下九颗牙齿,牙科医生建议医疗团队将他的饮食换为软食物,让他较易进食。 牙医的建议也记录在电子医疗报告中。 不过,手术后Simon Lee仍继续食用普通餐,直到手术隔日,护士听到病患剧烈咳嗽,上前查看询问但他并没有回应,但她事后声称并没有发现他噎着。 Simon…

载假乘客险遭打劫 德士司机鸣车笛获救

一名德士司机载客遭“假乘客”殴打,疑似企图抢劫,所幸司机及时按响车喇叭,将“假乘客”吓得逃离现场。 署名Muhd Taufiq的网友在脸书上帖文,指其担任德士司机的父亲,于昨日(19日)清晨5时许,在后港6大道的巴士站险些遭人抢劫,虽然获救,但是满身伤痕累累。 他于昨日清晨5时21分被母亲叫醒后,自母亲口中听闻有关坏消息。 帖文中写到,网友父亲是在后港的德士站前,遇到这名声称要到圣淘沙名胜世界赌场的男子,说着本地华语表示忘记带一些东西,因此请父亲在他的指引下,载他一程。 据悉,男子身材高大,一头金发且身穿白色上衣和蓝色牛仔裤。他指示网友父亲在附近一带游走后,就在后港6大道的巴士站要求停车,随后就自后大力勒住父亲的颈部往后拉,导致父亲感觉到呼吸困难。“父亲被勒住时大力挣扎,甚至尝试咬住嫌犯的手部。” “岂知男子下车走到驾驶座,将我父亲的胸部压向座位,并不断朝父亲的脸挥拳,大约有四、五次。” 网友表示,父亲曾尝试在男子下车时尝试脱下安全带,但是他当时有点虚脱并受到惊吓,才未能成功逃脱。 父亲鸣笛  男子溜走 遭男子殴打后,父亲成功按下车笛向附近的居民求救,只是当时该区并没有人。而男子在父亲鸣笛后,立刻将父亲推开,关掉车子引擎,并将钥匙丢到汽车的仪表板上,跳下车跑得不见踪影。 父亲也立即报警,警员于10分钟后赶抵现场,并召来救护车将父亲送院治疗,警方调查官已经就此事向父亲录取口供。…

Minister Tan Chuan-Jin confirms why Licensing Regime must be withdrawn

  Minister Tan Chuan-Jin’s inability to explain, let alone justify, the basic…