~by: Simeon Ang~

Pragmatism, an attribute that our government is known to propagate in all of its policies, is clearly evident in this year’s budget. Analysts were right to tone down expectations about the possibilities that Budget 2012 would pump a huge stimulus into the economy on a short term basis.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, mentioned from the start of his speech, that even though the estimated GDP growth of one to three percent for 2012, was lower than previously anticipated, it was still somewhere within the medium term growth potential of three to five percent for Singapore. Thus, setting the stage for its utilitarian budget that is expected to yield a $2.8 billion primary surplus for FY12.

A few key thrusts emerged from the budget that would directly affect businesses in Singapore. These thrusts would significantly affect the labour market, and three different sectors in the economy, namely, the tourism sector, the public transport sector and the healthcare sector.

Populist Labour Measures?

Off the bat, the finance minister remarked of the need to “reduce (the economy’s) dependence on foreign labour”. What came next could be widely contrived as a populist move to stymie increasing criticism from the ground about pro-immigration policies. The minister sought to introduce a reduction in the dependency ratio ceiling (DRCs) in the manufacturing and services sectors.

While the writer will not go into details about the changes, it is notable that the steps taken by the government could instead lead to higher inflation. This additional focus to hire locals as well as boost lower income wages could cut both ways as prices for goods and services will likely be driven up as businesses push cost increases to consumers. As OCBC’s review aptly puts it, “In the end, whether your income growth outstrips inflation or inflation outstrips your income growth will be the key determinant of whether your real wealth goes up or down”.

An Investment into a Tourism Hub

In a further boost to the local tourism industry, the government intends to inject a further $905 million into the Tourism Development Fund (TDF) as it jostles with other tourism destinations for the coveted tourist dollar. The fund, previously announced in 2004, seeks to ensure that Singapore has sufficient world-class infrastructure and tourism amenities to compete with regional rivals. It also helps the private sector to organize “iconic events” which boost tourist traffic. One such example is the Formula One race which is partly funded by the fund.

While the view that Singapore aspires to be a hub in all-too-many-places continues to be validated, it can be said that the tourist dollar is more attractive than most. In a way, the tourist dollar is a foreign direct investment in particular to the retail industry. While that direct investment could aid and cushion any impact domestically, it comes with its own price. For instance, the drive for the tourist dollar has led to the two integrated resorts that grace our shores and has reaped incredible revenues both in the retail industry as well as tax revenues. However, the social ills of which, cannot be ignored.

An Election Bugbear Addressed

OCBC contends that this year’s budget has addressed one of the main bugbears in the 2011 general election. In its review of the budget, OCBC said that budget 2012 recognises that transport infrastructure has not quite kept pace with the growth in the workforce. There is thus expectation that transport spending will increase by some 17.8 percent.

The government has also earmarked $1.1 billion to increase the supply of buses and reduce crowding and waiting times for buses in the short term. 550 buses will be publicly funded, with the remaining privately funded by the PTOs. The finance minister stressed that this investment would on a one-time basis and that bus operations will ultimately rest on PTOs’ improvements in efficiency as well as fare revenues. Whether these capital expenditures will be linked to future fare hikes, remains much to be seen, however, this writer feels that it will be more likely than not.

Tuning in to the Graying Heart of the Nation

Singapore will be doubling the amount it spends on healthcare in an attempt to address the concerns of a graying population. Yearly healthcare expenditure is set to increase from the current $4 billion to $8 billion over the next five years. The increase will go towards enhancing healthcare infrastructure as well as increasing healthcare manpower, including doctors and nurses.  Support for the middle class on the taking up of private healthcare services was also on the cards as the government sought to assuage fears of burgeoning healthcare expenses.

OCBC feels that the significant investment is in line with the government’s aim of portraying the nation as a medical hub and will go some ways in attaining that goal.

Pragmatism in the Face of a Downturn

Notwithstanding the commercial aspects of the above, it is imperative to note that the government has not taken too kindly to stimulus measures, opting instead, to invest on a long term basis. However astute as it might be, this leaves the short and medium term vulnerable to exposure to an external shock.

The writer notes that in a separate statement by Bank of America in which the banking giant said that, "While the consensus has shifted (about a US economic turnaround), we haven’t,” said BOA. “We continue to argue that the recent improvement is due to a recovery from the oil and Japan shocks, but ultimately will be reversed by shocks in the second half of this year. Moreover, in our view, recent news underscores, rather than undercuts our forecast of a very weak second half.”

Being an export driven economy, we are often faced with upheavals in the economic and financial market. In particular, any shock factors experienced in the US market is felt exponentially here in Singapore. That is not to say, that if such a doomsday-prediction were to be realised, our government would be caught with their pants down. The government still has the reactionary ability to create an additional discretionary budget to combat a steeper than expected downturn. In the meantime, the business community will continue to look to the government regarding the implementation of initiatives that it has espoused in Budget 2012.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

PSP’s Brad Bowyer shares photo of him and Lee Hsien Yang, says it requires nationwide effort to “recover Singapore”

The Progress Singapore Party (PSP) on Thursday (18 June) announced six of…

众筹两万元担保金 田柳金诉讼入禀上诉庭

曾卷入与国大诉讼持久战的田柳金(Jeanne-Marie Ten 译音),近期有意再入禀上诉庭,上诉此前高庭对其诉讼的判决。但首先她必须先支付高达两万元的担保金(security for costs)。 她目前正在网络平台发起众筹,向网民解释其诉讼来龙去脉,并吁请网民支持。她说,她必须在本月22日筹到两万元,并在26日提呈上诉通知,否则诉讼将不受理。 “据我所知,不论是英国还是马来西亚法庭,都没有所谓提成担保金的要求,但遗憾的是,这就是新加坡当前的处境。”她也非议如果在上诉陈情前还有先支付一笔费用,那么法律中保障国人有上诉的权益之意义何在? 2018年7月,高庭驳回田柳金起诉国大疏忽、违反合约、滥用职权及威胁的官司,指田没足够凭据证明指控。 但田柳金坚信,她有理由再把高庭裁决入禀到上诉庭,“在去年的书面判决,其实高庭也指国大也有不当之处”,但她认为尽管有大量文件证据,惟高庭并没有为她被开除和职涯被毁掉,要国大负起责任。 田柳金过去曾是国大设计与环境学院的硕士生,2002年入学。不过她指其导师于2004年利用她的学术研究成果,为一项个人学术作业申请津贴,尔后获教育部八万元津贴。但是之后导师拒绝在该报告中加入田的名字。 担心学术职涯受影响,当时田柳金也曾要求换导师,不过她指责校方站在导师一方,几经投诉都不得要领,她投诉到副教务长后,校方才召开调查委员会调查此事。 田柳金在2005年2月完成论文,但她表示数月后国大开出让田毕业的新条件:必须接受大学对于导师的处置。而田柳金的准硕士资格在2006年9月被剥夺。…

新山购屋住每日往返 我国公民护照被留字“不能住马国”

我国中年男子在马来西亚柔佛新山买房子住,每天我国和马来西亚柔佛州两地往返,近日通关时引起关卡人员注意,关卡官员随后更在其护照上留下“不能住马来西亚”的字眼。 男子的外甥近日将此事件和“留言”的照片上传到社交媒体上,引起网民的关注。 外甥指中年男子是新加坡人,但是在新山购屋,每天两地来回,但是在上周三准备入境马来西亚时,面对关卡人员的提问。 中年男子讲解了自己的情况后,官员竟然叫它卖掉新山的屋子,搬回新加坡去住,甚至在护照上“留字”。 外甥对此感到不满,因此在社交媒体上帖文,询问是否有明文规定外国人不能在马来西亚购房。 柔佛州移民局受询及时证实有关事件,发言人表示已经联络了护照持有人,目前调查正在进行中。 社交准证仅用于旅游 据我国外交部官网资料显示,我国可免签证进入马来西亚长达30天,而上载的护照照片中,也显示了入境西马半岛30天的准证盖章(社交准证)。 但是一名资深的马国律师则表示,社交准证仅允许新加坡公民到马国旅游,却不是定居。 他指出,外籍人士可申请马来西亚的“我的第二家园”计划,否则外国人只要购屋就能居住,和马国公民又有什么差别。据官网显示,只要拥有一定的财务能力就能申请,我国申请者必须拥有至少11万元的流动资产。 网民表示,其实关卡官员并没有真正做错什么,因为我国公民确实不能借着“拥有屋子”的理由,而居住在马国。 也有网民指出,其实很多人钻法律漏洞,为了赚取小钱,他们将新加坡的组屋出租了,然后在新山购屋居住。这些购屋者的选项住址包括了在新山的新山世纪花园(Taman…

AGC says camera installed outside toilet of police station; Stolen tap costs more than almost all of IKEA's

It was reported yesterday (15 Aug) that a man who stole a…