~by: Ravi Philemon~

the following is the transcript of my welcome speech at TOC’s Awards Night:

Thank you Mr Chiam See Tong and Mrs Lina Chiam for gracing our event as Guests of Honour. Thank you to our friends, well-wishers, volunteers and readers of TOC. Without your goodwill and support TOC would not have reached this milestone.
What do I say on an occasion such as this? I think it will be apt to remember some important events from the past five years.
The former chief editor and one of the founders of TOC in remembering why TOC started says, “In those days the media and the government were always slamming netizens. Ya, even in those days they were discrediting it.” So the name The Online Citizen was coined to say that even if we are online, we are still citizens – so stop slamming us.
TOC was started after the 2006 General Election on 1 December 2006, because of the unfair coverage by the mainstream media of the opposition.
By 2007, we had grown to a certain level. When TOC’s then deputy editor Gerald Giam wrote about Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s son, Li Hongyi contravening Singapore Armed Force’s general orders, Reuters highlighted that several blogs have emerged as an alternative source of information for the city-state’s internet savvy population, over pro-government newspapers.
In 2008, activism became more firmly entrenched in the DNA of TOC. TOC being part of the ‘Bloggers 13′, submitted a proposal to Minister for Information, Communication and Arts, to deregulate the internet. 2008 was also the year TOC took to Speakers’ Corner to protest the public transport fare hike.
2009 was the coming of age of TOC. When we covered the AWARE saga, our servers crashed a few times.  It was also the year we started speaking up for and campaigning against the mandatory aspect of the death penalty.
In 2010, TOC started speaking up for the homeless and the people with disabilities, and the issues we highlighted were considered important enough to be brought up and discussed in Parliament. Of course the Government would still not mention TOC by name, but chided ‘irresponsible websites’ for spreading falsehoods online.
In 2010, TOC also organised the ‘Face to Face’ dialogue with political party leaders. The People’s Action Party representative was conspicuously absent in this dialogue.
2011 was probably the most momentous year for TOC. It started with the Prime Minister gazetting TOC as a political association saying TOC has the potential to influence the opinions of their readership and shape political outcomes in Singapore; and ended with the Law and Foreign Affairs Minister commenting that what TOC had published on a certain issue was quite false.
From 2006 to 2011, if there is a familiar stance that the Government had adopted about TOC and the socio-political blogosphere in general, it is that it is irresponsible, that we are the lunatic fringe and that our articles are false.
But despite these characterisations, TOC has grown all thanks to our volunteers, well-wishers and readers.
In 2011, we covered the General Election organised the ‘Face to Face 2′ with the all the Presidential candidates, covered the Presidential Election, and took to the Speakers’ Corner to protest the MRT disruptions and to call for, among other things, for the CEO of SMRT to resign.
I really do not know if TOC will last another 5 years. It is extremely difficult to keep a volunteer run entity like TOC going, especially with the slamming we keep receiving and the high expectations of our readers.
If we are to keep going and growing, we would at least need to go semi-professional, and for that we will need funds.
But one thing we promise our well-wishers and readers – we will continue to be a community of Singaporeans, and to be a voice for the voiceless for as long as we can.
Thank you.

More updates from the night and video coming soon.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SJP: Certain control is needed for alchol consumption but needs to be equal to all

Singapore Justice Party (SJP) issues a press release on the new Liquor…

‘Rubber duck revolution’ takes off in Thailand

Bangkok has been gripped by a rubber duck frenzy since pro-democracy protesters…

大士关卡展开为期半年 虹膜脸部扫描通关系统试跑

大士关卡目前在自动走道入境处通道,展开为期半年的虹膜和脸部扫描通关系统实验。 移民和关卡局(ICA)自上周一(4月8日)开始,在大士关卡移民大厅检查站的一个入境处通道,展开了这个为期六个月的试验计划。 移民和关卡局行动发展主任宋建养监察(41岁)称,除了测试虹膜和脸部扫描系统的有效性和准确性,同时也将评估入境者通关所需要的时间。 “这个通关过程肯定会更快,且更方便出入境人士,因为他们不用出示和扫描护照。” 他形容使用自动走道通关的人士,通关过程可以在一分钟内完成。 护照指纹扫描将走入历史 一旦试验成功,护照和指纹扫描的程序将走入历史。有了新的免触碰扫描通关,面对指纹褪色问题的出入境者无须再担心不能通关了。 “如果他们无需出示和扫描护照,通关过程耗时更短。” 之前曾在移民局进行虹膜图像注册的人士,将是首批参加此实验的人士。 他指出,当局自2017年开始已经开始收集国民的虹膜图像,目前已经由“相当大的储存数据”能够进行着有意义的实验。 当踏入这个用于实验的走道后,有关人士将受提醒看着虹膜和脸部扫描仪器的屏幕。系统将捕获他们的脸部和虹膜图像后,继续验证他们的身份。随后屏幕将出现绿色勾号显示核准成功,即可通关,出口闸也会打开。 有关试验计划仍在测试系统的稳定性,以及确定脸部和虹膜图像,是否会受到周围照明等环境因素影响等事项。…

律政部《防假消息法》指南范例:历史学者“J”推论冷藏行动未涉国安问题

《防止网络假信息和防止网络操纵法案》在今年5月正式在国会通过,并已在六月25日发布于宪报,正式生效。该法自提呈国会以来即备受争议,不仅在国会引起激辩,包括国内外学术界、媒体、公民组织等都已对该法提出质疑。 其中,本地历史学者覃炳鑫博士发现,律政部也有发布一份指南,以不同范例解释哪些情况下可援引《防假消息法》,例如哪些陈述属于意见,哪些是造假事实。 这份指南指出,可援引该法的条件包括出现虚假事实,以及涉及公众利益。其中一个栏目特别提出学术界研究例子,阐述什么情况下可能出现学者发表虚假陈述。 覃炳鑫博士曾受邀出席去年的国会特选委员会听证会,为如何应对网络假消息提供意见。期间,他因为提及1963年冷藏行动和1987年光谱逮捕行动,目的在于政治利益,而非国家安全问题,批评人民行动党和前总理李光耀,才是假新闻的散播者,引起律政部长尚穆根等人围剿。 覃炳鑫发现,上述指南陈列的其中一个学术界例子,是这样的: J,一名历史研究者,依据各种历史文件推论,指冷藏行动未涉及国家安全问题。 而后指南继续阐释: 针对(ix)的个案,假设J诠释历史文件,尔后又承认他的诠释是不准确的,然后又重复之前的误导性诠释,那么J就是做出了虚假事实陈述。 难道是如有雷同,纯属巧合?虽然上述案例没有指名道姓,但似乎在影射覃炳鑫博士的经历。对此覃博士只得在脸书自嘲:“如果你的政府拿专制立法特别针对你,那也算一种荣幸。” 不过,他也补充,事实是没有任何证据能表明,在冷藏行动下的拘留者涉及参与颠覆国家的共产党阴谋。 针对上世纪50、60年代期间,新加坡是否有共产主义阴谋散布?左翼份子是否受马共唆使企图进行不利新加坡的政治活动,才有必要进行逮捕行动,覃炳鑫在去年的听证会,和尚穆根等人展开六小时的审问拉锯战。 在过程中,尚穆根以“是或不是”、“同不同意”、“你有读过这些资料吗?”“对与否”等威权式的提问,无意与覃炳鑫对话,过度简化复杂的历史争议,其背后意图却是要质疑覃炳鑫历史研究的正当性和理据。…