~by: Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss~

Raffles Hotel [1] on Beach Road is undoubtedly an icon. I love the place. I am sure many Singaporeans are fond of the place too.
Built in 1887, it was extensively renovated between 1989 and 1991. I must say, those involved in the restoration works did a marvellous job. The architecture of the building and its elegant interiors evoke the nostalgic ambience of a bygone era. Raffles Hotel is certainly a Singapore landmark I would be proud to boast about and to bring my foreign friends to see.
Sadly, Raffles Hotel does not belong to Singaporeans, as I only recently found out. Until 2005, the hotel was owned by Singapore-listed “Raffles Holdings”[2], a Temasek Holdings company.
In 2005, Raffles Holdings sold all of its hotel assets to US-based Colony Capital for SGD$1.72 billion. The portfolio of assets owned by Raffles Holdings consisted of 41 hotels and resorts, with its most prominent establishment being the luxurious 103-suite Raffles Hotel. (I guess I did not pick up on this news at the time it was announced.)
At the time of the acquisition, Colony Capital chief executive Thomas J. Barrack said: “We are honored to become the custodian of one of the finest hotel chains in the world and a true national treasure of the people of Singapore. We deeply respect the historical significance of the Raffles Hotel, Singapore and we consider it our responsibility to protect that legacy.”[3] In 2006, Colony Capital teamed up with a Saudi businessman to buy Fairmount Hotels and Resorts in a deal that resulted in Toronto-based Fairmount Raffles Hotel International[4] becoming the new owner of Raffles Hotel.
On 8 April 2010, The Straits Times reported that a Qatar sovereign wealth fund has bought Raffles Hotel for US$275 million (S$384 million), making it the third change of ownership in seven years.
This morning, 14 January 2012, I read in the Straits Times[5] that “Singapore’s grand old dame Raffles Hotel is finally in the hands of its new Qatari owners” – the government-owned Qatar National Hotels Company.
Though I feel a sense of loss upon reading today’s Straits Times article, the fact is, that the horse bolted out of the stable seven years ago.
Still, questions nag my mind:

  • How could parent company Temasek Holdings consider it alright to sell away “Singapore’s grand old dame”? There is only ONE Raffles Hotel and it is of historic and sentimental value to Singaporeans.
  • Did Singapore need the money badly that we had sell off our heirloom and heritage? (To my understanding, people sell off their family jewels in times of war or crisis, out of necessity, in order to survive their hard times.)
  • Have Singaporeans benefitted from the proceeds of the sale of Raffles Hotel in 2005? More hospital beds? Better care facilities for our elderly? More affordable housing for Singaporeans? Higher subsidies for education? Improvements in public transport?

I suppose it is pointless to lament the loss of Raffles Hotel. The next time I talk about Raffles Hotel to my foreign friends, I have to remind myself that Raffles Hotel does not belong to Singaporeans, so I have nothing to boast about.
 


[5] http://www.straitstimes.com/BreakingNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_755535.html

This article first appeared on Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss’ blog. TOC thanks Jeannette for allowing us to reproduce it here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Pink Dot 2011 – Stimulating Social Change or Reinforcing Status Quo?

by: Lisa Li/ On 18 June 2011, a crowd more than ten…

We must save humanity – Dr Jacques Attali

By Ravi Philemon “We are not out of the crisis yet”, said Dr…

Indranee: 4G leaders will strive to ensure all have opportunities to improve their lives

At a dialogue held by the National University of Singapore’s Social Service…

2019彭博创新指数 我国滑出三甲

韩国今年蝉联彭博社全球创新指数冠军,而我国则跌出三甲,屈居第六,被德国(第二)、芬兰(第三)、瑞士(第四)和以色列(第五)赶超。 彭博社连续七年发布全球创新指数(Innovation Index),使用7项指标分析数十项标准,包括研发支出、制造能力以及高科技上市公司的集中度。 2019彭博创新指数显示,然韩国继续蝉联冠军,但是它的领先优势已经缩小,因为韩国在专利项目的得分降低。 与此同时,位居第二的德国正缩小和韩国的差距,在制造和研发投入强度附加值的推动下,它大部分得分源自大众汽车、罗伯特·博世有限公司、戴姆勒公司等工业巨头。 另一方面,中国的排名今年首次超过英国,排在第16。彭博社说,在华为、京东方科技(Boe Technology)研发投入的推动下,中国的专利得分排名第二,不过在整体生产力方面,仍然落后其他发达经济体。 在去年,我国因为在教育效率项目中排名第一,使之在创新排名上超越德国、瑞士和芬兰,位居第三。 我国为鼓励创新,也推出不少政策,包括鼓励企业申请生产力与创新优惠计划(PIC)津贴。近期金融管理局也宣布,将在下月推出总值7500万元的新加坡资本市场津贴(Grant for Equity Market…