~by: Benjamin Cheah~

“We want to get people thinking, get them to reflect on media and politics,” said Mr Tan Tarn How. Mr Tan, Senior Research Fellow at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), was speaking about a conference conducted by the IPS on the 4th of October to discuss the impact of new media on the 2011 General Elections.

TOC’s Howard Lee analysed the data and methods as presented in the conference in his article (see HERE). This article will discuss the findings most relevant to TOC and its readers.

Was GE 2011 an Internet election?

The research effort was guided by an overarching question: Was the 2011 General Elections an Internet election? Mr Tan and the other researchers wanted to determine if the Internet mattered as a channel to communicate news and views, for parties and candidates to reach out to voters, and to influence voters’ views and voting. The researchers surveyed 2000 people to answer this question.

The answer was a clear ‘No’.

51.4 per cent of the participants revealed how they voted. Of this figure, 57.6 per cent said that they had decided whom to vote for before the elections were announced.  It seems that events prior to the General Elections play a greater role in determining voting patterns than the hustings.

Of particular note is that only 4.9 per cent of respondents said they made up their minds on Cooling Off Day. This is the lowest score among the other six options. This contradicts the government’s position that Cooling Off Day was necessary to allow voters to calmly reflect on the hustings and make their choice.

Information regarding the media consumption patterns of the people who made up their minds during the hustings was not presented during the conference. Nevertheless, the survey data revealed that only 30 per cent of the participants turned to Facebook and/or blogs for election information. Of this 30 per cent, 95.5 per cent also turned to the mainstream media for news regarding the elections.

Further, 86.3 per cent of the participants read election news offline, while 41.1 per cent consumed election information from the Internet. The survey results indicate that the traditional media still dominates election coverage in Singapore. For this election, it appears that alternative media, such as The Online Citizen, complements mainstream news coverage instead of supplanting or competing with it. It also seems that people who consume online news are not in a ‘ghetto’, in which they shut themselves off from other views.

Consumers tended to think that the media only played a somewhat important role in determining how they voted. The survey tested for the importance of various media as a source of information on the elections. This test used a five-point scale, with 1 as ‘unimportant’ and 5 as ‘very important’. Newspapers and television were at the top, rated at 3.65 and 3.59 respectively. Blogs were measured at 2.58 and Facebook scored 2.39.

Speaking at the sidelines, Mr Tan said, “The Internet had an impact on the elections, but this was not an Internet election.”

Profiling the Alternative Online Media

Dr Cherian George, Associate Professor at the Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, discussed the editorial stances and strategies of alternative online media. Dr George focused his research on four websites: TOC, Temasek Review (now Temasek Review Emeritus, or TRE), Yawning Bread, and the Singapore General Election Portal (SGEP).

Different bloggers had different approaches to regulations. On the issue of Cooling Off Day, SGEP observed Cooling Off Day, while TOC and Yawning Bread continued posting. This suggests that bloggers will tend to ignore blanket bans. Regarding more specific legislation, such as that on defamation, TOC “takes no chances” and moderates defamatory content, while TRE publishes defamatory posts.

Comparing TOC’s and TRE’s approaches, Dr George calls the latter “Singapore’s top rumour website”, saying that people “are willing to tolerate the fact that it is wrong most of the time if it is right once in a while.” On the other hand, TOC “is more exposed to political risk … but arguably this limitation is more than outweighed by the benefits of being able to network face to face in Singapore.” These benefits include getting donations, drawing volunteers, working with civil society organisations, and playing a leading role in progressive movements.

Alternative media tended to share similar views on fairness and balance. The four websites in Dr George’s study “identify with the opposition underdog”, and aim to level the political playing field. They reject traditional standards of balance, instead claiming to be a counterweight to the mainstream media, thereby creating a more balanced media system.

With the exception of TRE, the three blogs studied by Dr George “expressed some disappointment with the public.” These blogs do not trust prevailing popular sentiment on many issues, as some progressive causes – gay rights, foreign worker rights, abolishing the death penalty – are not usually popular. These blogs do not see themselves in a popularity contest or task themselves with winning votes for the opposition, instead working towards “raising the level of political maturity of Singaporeans”.

Dr George concluded by predicting that “alternative media will continue to evolve in Singapore… they will not converge around a set of common norms… (and they will) continue to be fragmented and diverse in their interpretations of their journalistic mission’.

The impact of the Internet is intangible

While alternative online media may not have a major role in influencing GE 2011, the impact of the Internet may well be intangible and difficult to measure. In his presentation, Dr George noted that these media see themselves as part of a “long term struggle in which the quality of the debate matters as much as their outreach or the election outcome.” The goal of alternative online media is not so much as influencing election outcomes as influencing attitudes and perceptions of politics.

Mr Alex Au, owner of Yawning Bread, said that the effects of alternative online media are indirect. Instead of focusing on the type of media used during the elections, he said researchers should instead study how the media influenced ideas and behaviours. Speaking to reporters, he said, “We can’t reduce everything to the medium. We need to look at the meme.”


Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

“Why double standards?”: Netizens slam Govt for exempting World Economic Forum attendees from SHN period

Attendees at the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) special annual meeting in August…

Medisave withdrawal limits increased to pay for Integrated Shield Plans: MOH

Singaporeans above 40 years old can tap on more funds in their Medisave…

惊!马国妇女隔离期间竟外出用餐,还被确诊!

戴着隔离手环,竟然还外出用餐,马来西亚一名妇女最终还被检测出出呈阳性结果。 日前,邻国马来西亚一名妇女从外国回马后,在戴着隔离手环的情况下仍外出用餐,被网友拍摄下来并上传到网络上,引起议论纷纷。 据马媒报导指出,网络上流传戴着隔离手环的妇女,外出用餐时的照片是拍摄于本月6日,而妇女则是在本月4日返马。 报导表示,当妇女抵达吉隆坡国际机场时,就有被要求进行隔离14天,但当时初步检测是呈阴性的结果,不过为了安全起见,还是要求她戴上隔离手环。而她被发现在6日,在怡保的餐厅内享用早餐,但照片却是近日才流传出去。 妇女与其儿子则是在隔离第13天内,第二次检测时确认感染冠病,17日被送入院。 不少网民对于妇女的行为感到不满,痛批妇女罔顾隔离条规,并对其或对民众带来危害的自私举止感到愤怒,引发大量网民挞伐。 而北马首相署公共卫生特别顾问嘉米拉也在其推特上传此照片,并斥责该名妇女太无耻,明目张胆外出用餐很可能会引发第二波新冠病毒疫情。 在网友的热议下,霹州卫生局也采取相关行动,于在昨日(20日)鉴定该妇女身份。 It’s people like her…

王瑞杰:部长、议员将减薪一个月

副总理兼财政部长王瑞杰,今日在国会总结新财年政府财政政策辩论时,宣布所有部长、政治职务者都将减薪一个月、国会议员也将减少一个月的津贴。 他表示此举是为了与国人共度时艰。 此外,总统哈莉玛也同样减薪一月,部分高级公务员也减薪半个月。 他在致辞中也指出,企业和管理高层和工会及工友站在同一阵线,政治领导也会和公务员及人民合作,共同抗疫。 “新加坡得以对疫情作出有效反应,这是因为人民和政府之间的相互信任。”