excerpted from Social Dimension Online:


The last and possibly most damaging case against Western-style social welfare is that it is financially unsustainable and will eventually bankrupt the state. At a seminar on Singapore’s Central Provident Fund (CPF) last year, a senior politician likened European pay-as-you-go pensions to political Ponzi schemes that were never going to pay up on their promises. This view is misinformed. It is true that pensions constitute the heaviest fiscal burden among all sources of social spending in Europe and have come under pressure from population ageing and economic stagnation. But this area is complex and dynamic. Research done at the London School of Economics has found that reforms in recent years have addressed policy constraints to different extents across Europe and in some cases have put pension systems back on a more sustainable path. The reference to Ponzi schemes is also disingenuous because it fails to recognise how these pensions have helped many generations of older persons in Europe avoid poverty and retire with a sense of financial independence and personal dignity. Sociological studies have shown that these pensions often enable older adults to contribute to their adult children as they look to establish their own families and careers. In contrast, the majority of elderly Singaporeans are compelled to rely on their adult children for financial security, even though retirees are likely to have fewer children in future. Can we say that either system is more sustainable?

The weakest argument against the fiscal sustainability of Western welfare is probably that it led to the current economic crisis. It did not. The current economic crisis gripping Europe may be due to many things, such as negligent regulation of banking practices or even inherent flaws in modern capitalism, but it was not due to the welfare state. The misperception may have arisen from the sweeping cuts to welfare spending that countries have made. But in this case, the site of treatment does not indicate the source of ailment.


Read the rest of the article HERE.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

总理夫人评论香港问题:香港对中国扮演什么角色?

除了总理李显龙此前在公开场合评论香港示威活动,近日总理夫人暨淡马锡控股总裁何晶,亦针对香港问题在脸书表达看法。 何晶是针对此前《彭博社》指新加坡似乎从目前的香港局势得到好处,在脸书发长文,反问“对于现代香港而言,真正的问题是它对中国而言充当什么角色?” 该文指,在今年4月至8月间,大约有40亿美元资金流入新加坡。尽管这与香港目前约1.7兆美元的储备相比微不足道。不过马来亚银行金英证券分析师Ju Ye Lee认为,若情况持续香港的处境将恶化。 在何晶的贴文开端,她先是指香港一些人士似乎执迷于把新加坡视作“竞争对手”;两者尽管都曾为英殖民地,实则扮演截然不同的角色。 何晶贴文中指出,中国共产党通知中国后,香港充当中国贸易窗口;中国改革开放,香港制造业迁移中国,至今香港基本已无制造业工作,制造业仅占当地GDP约2至3巴仙。 她认为如今香港成了中国的服务中心;但随着中国打开门户,香港真正竞争者是伤害、广州和北京,也对比到2000年左右,中国经济规模已达到约1万亿美元(1.36万亿新元),大约是香港GDP的六倍。 “香港的GDP现在等于中国GDP的大约3巴仙。换句话说,中国的经济规模是香港的30倍以上。” 她也认为,即便是深圳如今都已超越香港,跨国公司也搬迁至中国上海等城市落户。 故此执迷于关注资金和人员向新加坡的流动(而忽略了人员和资金向美国、加拿大、澳大利亚、英国等其他地方的流动,特别是专业才能),是搞错了重点。 她也指出,新加坡在独立后找到了生存的路径;香港主要依靠中国大方注入的一小部分服务业。…

拜尔子公司料面对逾万诉讼 惟淡马锡管理层”对其前景充满信心“

德国制药集团拜耳(Bayer)子公司孟山都(monsanto)官司缠身,迄今为止在美国已面对三次败诉。该公司被起诉其生产的除草剂致癌。 该公司在美国料面对多达1万3000宗诉讼。孟山都是拜耳旗下的农业生物技术部门。此前该公司被一名加州男子起诉,指长期使用其生产的除草剂“农达”(Roundup),导致他被诊断患有“非霍奇金淋巴瘤”。 结果旧金山法院陪审团在今年三月得出一致结论,认为除草剂是导致男子患癌的主要因素。 另一方面,澳洲也有一名54岁园丁奥加利罗洛(Michael Ogliarolo),在上月入禀法庭起诉孟山都。从1997年至去年期间经常使用农达除草剂,确诊罹患非何杰金氏淋巴瘤。 在美国,孟山都至今已被下令支付四名癌症患者的赔偿,最近一宗就被判处20亿美元赔款。 除了除草剂官司之外,拜耳还面临着更多的法律纠纷:上周六,巴黎检察院启动了针对孟山都的调查。孟山都被控非法搜集对该企业持批评立场的记者、政治家以及科学家的私人数据。 淡马锡去年助拜耳收购孟山都 去年,拜耳以560亿欧元的价格收购了孟山都。我国的淡马锡控股(Temasek Holdings),在去年4月襄助拜耳收购孟山都。拜尔出售3.6巴仙、价值30亿欧元(约48亿新元)的股权给淡马锡,以筹措收购孟山都的资金。 淡马锡控股刚在上周(7月9日)公布布截至三月底的2019财年年度报告。尽管投资组合净值(net portfolio)录得3130亿新元,不过,一年期股东回报率(one-year…

Put Mah Bow Tan on “live” TV

Andrew Loh / The Prime Minister has been on national television twice…

MAS lowers currency band to zero in monetary easing move

Earlier this morning (30 March), the central bank of Singapore, Monetary Authority…