Transient Workers Count Too invites you to a forum discussion on Saturday 15 October 2011

About one in every five families employs a maid. We depend on them to keep our households running smoothly, care for our elderly, look after our children.

Is it disruptive for them to be away from your home for as long as 24 hours as frequently as every week? How would we cope with balancing our work obligations with our family responsibilities? Would it cause difficulties in our family relationships, stresses at the workplace, and limit our social lives? Would your maid learn bad habits or place your family at risk if she has a regular day off?

Or would she be a better worker, rested and enthusiastic, grateful and happy to work for you, unwilling to jeopardise things by causing problems?

Most employers agree their maid should have rest time. But there are many views about when this should be, where, and what you need to cope with it. Is there enough support from the government? Can it provide more facilities? And would you even want to complicate your life with having to incorporate a day off into your weekly family routine.

We are keen to hear from you, to find out your challenges and fears, and your personal viewpoints about the day off. We would like to cordially invite you to join us for a discussion session, chaired by senior academic Dr Lai Ah Eng. Help us to understand your needs better. You’ll be joined by other employers who want their views to be known.

Date | Sat 15 October 2011

Time | 3.00 to 5.00pm

Venue | Singapore Council of Women’s Organisations, Training Room 3, 96 Waterloo St

Directions | See map. Closest MRT: Bras Basah (Circle line) or Bugis (East-West Line)

Moderator | Dr Lai Ah Eng, Senior Research Fellow, Asia Research Institute, NUS

RSVP | Email [email protected] by Friday 7 October 2011

Find out more here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The Singapore that’s great for everyone, except Singaporeans – Part 1 of 2

by: Eugenie Yeo/ I start off by saying that I’ve always been…

Why did SWAMI home breach its constitution for PAP?

The Online Citizen (TOC) reported on 15 August that the People’s Action…

Public servants in political parties – politically neutral?

Chew Thiam Kwee and Victor Lye are both public servants. One is…

从乔立盟典范 检视“高薪方能揽才”迷思

长期以来执政党人民行动党的想法,即我们需要“高薪养廉”,出高薪才能吸引人才、杜绝贪腐。因此,我们的高级公务员和部长都需要支付以高薪。而上周本地五位市长宣誓就职,亦有领取高薪(据2017年的薪资探讨报告,市长年薪约为66万元)。 当然,没有人会质疑市长为社会作出的贡献,问题是,他们是否值得支付这么多的薪水?此外,当选的议员是否能够履行职责。毕竟,公共服务才是他们最重要的职责。 近日,人民党主席乔立盟,却为我们树立了没有高薪也能服务选民的好榜样。他在脸书上呼吁波东巴西的失业居民,透过自己的网站寄出履历,而且他自己也将与开发商合作,创造一个互助的市场,让有需要的居民能够获得相关捐赠。 从乔立盟的立意而言,我们需知,他的所作所为出自自愿。他并非是当地的民选议员,也没有支付任何薪资,但却愿意投入自己的时间和精力来帮助新加坡人。 这样的例子与人民行动党的理念背道而驰,即需高薪支付公务人员,方能把事情做好一事。 承上所述,重点在于进入公共服务的人不应为高薪而来。虽然,所有的工作都应该付以相应的薪资报酬,但我们必须从中取得平衡。相比高薪的市长,乔立盟的榜样是否能让人们稍作停顿,重新思考人民行动党以“薪“为主的论述? 值得注意的是,乔立盟在本次大选中,仍不敌人民行动党的司徒宇斌。虽然他输了这场竞选,却依旧继续为波东巴西的人民努力,无条件地帮助他们。 尽管有人对他的行为嗤之以鼻,嘲讽他是为了下次大选做准备,但他起码没有把一切当作理所当然。他理解人民对自己工作的担忧,因此积极地为人民创造机会缓解他们的担心。 当然,没有人能够确保他在未来能够成功当选,毕竟对反对党而言,新加坡的政治环境是一场艰苦的战斗。 那些已习惯(或期待)高薪才能服务民众的人,当他们的薪资受到威胁,兴许无意间会发现他们啥都干不了。毕竟,国家与人民行动党之间的界限仍然非常模糊,除非有强大的反对党在国会中,这一界限才会明确。 我们有必要重新检视“高薪养廉”这个根深蒂固的信念。