by: Siew Kum Hong/

It is as if the PAP is determined to prove that leopards cannot change their spots. The People’s Association can try its best to spin the truth, but the latest revelation from the Workers’ Party completely destroys any plausible deniability that could possibly be left.

The Workers’ Party’s revelation has to be read to be believed, but in a nutshell, the HDB had the brazen nerve to lease some prime spots for grassroots events — apparently previously by the PAP-controlled Aljunied Town Council — to the People’s Association. This was done quickly after the General Elections, on 27 May and 13 June, and apparently without any announcement or publication anywhere. On 15 August, the PA informed Sylvia Lim, Chairman of Aljunied-Hougang Town Council, that “bookings by WP will not be allowed”.

This is offensive on so many levels. The HDB needs to explain why it did what it did, and the timing for those actions. Why did it suddenly lease those areas to the PA, after the PAP lost Aljunied GRC, when those areas had previously been managed by the town council? Has it ever leased such areas to the PA in other constituencies ? What was the criteria for choosing those areas?

As for the PA, this drives the final nail through its pretense of being a true grassroots organisation — as opposed to a state-funded para-political organisation used as a mobilisation vehicle by the ruling party. If it was truly non-political, it would not issue a blanket refusal to lease these areas to the Workers’ Party.

Many will consider me naive, but I had hopes after the General Elections that the PAP would truly learn its lessons, and become a fair and just party truly focused on doing the right thing for all Singaporeans — instead of working for the party’s own narrow interests. I now see that that was too much to hope for.

Before May 7, I had privately predicted that GE2016 would be Singapore’s equivalent of Malaysia’s GE2008, when the opposition tsunami rocked the long-time ruling coalition. I did not see that happening this year. After May 7, I thought that the PAP still had a chance of avoiding an opposition tsunami in the next elections.

Well, let’s just say that the PAP MPs and prospective candidates better have a Plan B in 2016, in case they lose. Many of them will likely need to use it.


This post first appeared on Siew Kum Hong’s blog.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

不带口罩搭霸王车还三度攻击德士司机,网友公开样貌揪女乘客

女乘客不带口罩,搭了德士后被指不付钱、还三次攻击德士司机,最后司机儿子在网上发文揪出霸王客,还公布了女乘客的样貌。 网友Kelvin Chua 昨日(15日)在脸书上发文,怒斥一名女乘客搭霸王车,还要攻击70岁的父亲,并将车内摄像公布,女乘客身穿无袖黑色,虽然未看见女乘客的攻击行为,但他也描述了女乘客三度攻击自己年迈的父亲。 网友透露,昨日早上11点25分左右,在宏茂桥10道第417座一带接了该名女乘客。女乘客看似20岁出头,并没有戴上任何口罩。 在搭上德士后,父亲在女乘客的要求下,自愿借她手机拨打电话,然而在17分钟的过程中,女乘客一直拨打不同的号码,其中还在电话与其他人发生争执。 虽然父亲多次要求女乘客归还手机,但她却不予理会,直到11时42分抵达布连拾街(Prinsep Street)后,才把手机还给父亲。 抵达目的地后,女乘客只跟他说了一句,“在这里等着”,并没有多余的解释,虽然父亲再三要求她支付车费,但她不予理会,下车走人。 女乘客的种种行为,让网友父亲起疑,于是便跟踪女乘客,20秒后,她突然转身向网友父亲,用手臂攻击她。 “她叫我爸在这里等着,没有给任何解释,尽管我爸向他索取车费,但她不加理会,下车走人。考虑到种种行为,我爸开始怀疑并跟踪她,20秒后,他突然转身,用手臂攻击我爸。” 网友续指,父亲继续跟踪她,不久后再次遭到她的攻击,虽然没有受伤,但却弄坏了父亲的手表。…

NSP: “EBRC again issued a disappointing report”

The National Solidarity Party (NSP) has strongly criticised the report released on…

Man involved in viral video apologises “many times” to condo security supervisor in private meeting

The resident who was part of the recent viral video had offered…

被追税达5.6亿新元 马前首相纳吉或失议员资格

马来西亚前首相纳吉遭税收局追税达5.6亿新元,或丧失国会议员资格,甚至面对破产。 据马国媒体《星洲日报》报导,纳吉代表律师法罕指出,税收局向纳吉追讨高达16.9亿令吉(5.6亿新元)的税款。 尽管纳吉已针对税收局的税收评估提出上诉,但代表税收局的律师仍计划申请简易判决。 上述诉讼订在下月30日审理。 税收局在今年3月向纳吉发出通知,追讨2011年至2017年的14.7亿令吉税款。 纳吉因未能在有效的时间缴付14.7亿令吉税款,因而遭内陆税收局追加超过2亿令吉的利息,最终他需偿还16.9亿令吉额外税款。 纳吉目前仍在面对国际公司贪污洗钱案审讯。昨日,在吉隆坡高庭还传出“诈弹”风波,警方接获举报高庭内藏有爆炸物,还劳驾拆弹小组到场,惟最终证实虚惊一场。