The following is an excerpt of an article on Yawning Bread

Alex Au/

I was speaking at an event organised by Maruah about the upcoming presidential election. Law professor Kevin Tan was the first speaker, giving a detailed run-down of the relevant constitutional provisions. This helped to clarify something that few Singaporeans, in the past, had much reason to pay attention to — what exactly the constitution says about the powers of the president.

Partly because of unfamiliarity with the role of the head of state, since our presidents have generally been like puppets on a string, many Singaporeans initially approached this election as a replay of the general election, bringing up issues such as housing, transport, the income gap and the influx of foreigners. Law minister K Shanmugam, in the last month or so, had to sternly tell Singaporeans that the president had no power at all — he was mostly to be a figurehead — except in a few areas where the constitution said he could act in his own discretion. Shanmugam’s attempt to shut Singaporeans up didn’t work as well as he might have hoped; expressions of bread-and-butter frustrations continue.

The mainstream media, taking the cue from the government, has mostly framed their reporting in the same way, but instead of saying that Singaporeans didn’t understand what the presidency was about, put a twist on it:  saying that certain candidates didn’t understand. The slant was that these candidates were “over-promising” and that they will surely fail to deliver and disappoint their supporters. There is also an unspoken slur that these candidates are out to break the law, raising the bogeyman of “confrontational politics”. Sotto Voce: These are bad candidates and you shouldn’t vote for them.

A reporter called me Sunday and asked me questions along those lines again. The thrust of the questions was to try to get me to agree that certain candidates were over-promising, and that they were unrealistic — from which it would be a short hop to saying they were delusional or confrontational. I resisted, reiterating what I said at the Maruah forum.

To which we will now come back. . .

Read the full article here.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Govt issues correction directions to States Times Review, AB-TC City News for false information on Wuhan coronavirus situation in S’pore

Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing on Fri (31 Jan) has…

新捷运:供电故障 万国、榜鹅站之间一度无列车服务

今早东北地铁线发生供电故障,万国地铁站(NE15)与榜鹅地铁站(NE17)之间一度没列车服务。 而根据新捷运公司今早约6时的推文,解释由于电力故障,正常的列车服务仅限于万国站和港湾站(NE1)之间。 稍后的贴文(约8时30分)则指万国站和榜鹅站之间,仅一号月台有列车服务。 当局在两站之间提供免费接驳巴士,也告知民众预计较长的通勤时间。不过港湾站和万国站的列车服务正常。 不过至截稿为止,新捷运未更新上述两站之间的列车服务何时恢复正常。 一些通勤民众也纷纷在脸书发图分享、互相转告上述资讯。只见站内人山人海,都是排队等车的群众。

The government’s knee-jerk reaction to wage proposals

~ By Gordon Lee ~ Last week, Professor Lim Chong Yah gave…

PRs allowed to retain property after giving up status?

By Andrew Loh [*Please see latest update below] According to a Channel…