Dear TOC editor

I saw your facebook’s call for people to share with TOC our experience of using Singapore public transport, hence I would like to share my train ride experience this morning with your readers and hopefully, the Transport Ministry. This morning (22 July 2011) I had an extremely unpleasant MRT ride at 8.00-8.15am on the train heading towards Joo Koon from Aljunied. When the train reached Lavender, it was announced that the train would be delayed for 30 minutes! This happened during rush hour when everyone wanted to get to their workplaces as soon as possible. Subsequent to that, passengers on the train had an awful experience of waiting for the train to reach the next station. The ride was jerky as the train would stop abruptly from station to station, causing many passengers to fall down. It was definitely an awful and unpleasant train ride experience for me. This kind of public transport service standard is definitely unacceptable and not tolerable in a “first-world country” like Singapore.

Regards,
Francis Ng

Dear Online Citizen

I enjoyed reading your post on the transport woes faced by everyday Singaporeans like myself. Somehow, having an avenue to voice our unhappiness and knowing that so many others are suffering as well helps lessen a little of my frustrations. So I thought I would share my experience. Unfortunately, I do not have any photos to accompany this account, as I did not think to take pictures during that time. Anyway, here goes:

The East-West line train (heading towards Joo Koon) experienced a disruption in train service this morning (Friday, 22 July) due to a train fault. While train faults are no longer rare occurences (say once in 50 years? Sorry, couldn’t resist the jibe. Heh) and commuters no longer bat an eye, but just sigh in resignation and dutifully inform their employers/friends/etc. that they will be late, it is perhaps the way the situation was dealt with that irked me.

The train I was on was travelling towards the City Hall station, when it stopped so suddenly that those who were not near the poles and could not grab onto it, struggled to keep their balance. A few fell. There was no apology for the sudden stop. The train remained immobile for a good 25 minutes or so. There was no explanation nor communication about what was going on. Twenty-five minutes passed when SMRT finally deigned to make an announcement, telling us it was a train fault and that there will be a delay. The train finally started moving, but stopped every few metres. Finally, we were told to get off at Raffles Place.

We got on the next train that came into Raffles Place. That train too stopped a couple of times during the journey (they said it was due to a train fault at the station in front. Shouldn’t it be a station fault then? I think they meant the train in front, not the station). Anyway, after several frustrating start and stops, the train finally resumed normal speed.

Sadly, my account is probably nothing out of the ordinary. And because of that, I do not think that an increase in fare is justifiable. If SMRT and SBS are doing a good job, I am sure most people do not mind paying more, but the congestion in trains, the long wait between the next train/bus, the inconsistency in arrival times, the frequent breakdowns really makes the idea of paying more (for this standard of service) incomprehensible to me.

Also, SMRT should be more efficient in their communication with commuters, instead of leaving us wondering. A little more sensitivity will definitely help reduce commuters’ frustrations. For instance, an apology for the sudden stop during the journey today would have helped cool some tempers, but SMRT appeared very cavalier and unconcerned about the safety of their passengers.

Tina


Some of those left waiting for the 966 for as long as I’d been at bus stop. I did not know when the next arrived. I was forced to take taxi. I waited for one for 10mins and still no sign of 966.

I have been forced to cab at this time a number of times in the past few months. My work hours are flexible but not excessively. I left my place at Segar at 8.20 today and waited for a bus, either 966 or 700, which is along my route for nearly an hour without luck. I couldn’t board those that I arrived even if I tried.

I currently work in Ubi and from B Panjang there is no direct way to reach. As mrt is slow via Woodlands bus is still the only option. I take the 154 (20min journey) from either whitley (700) or Trellis Towers (966) to MacPherson and walk into office from there.

I have written to LTA and SMRT buses previously. They told me bendy buses are not suitable for 700 due to space at Shenton Way depot. I suggested they tweak the route to allow for longer buses. No reply since Jan 2011.

I also requested when a proper timing system will be implemented so Smartphone users can at least know when the next bus is arriving at stops without electronic sign boards. No reply on that either.

I have never seen bendy buses on 966 route.

The 190 is a route that has gained much attention and has definitely been improved but you can see these two routes have improved little if at all.

For me, the 190 is further away, uncovered walk, and not near the LRT route.

The cost of my trip this morning: $13.40 taxi + fare on LRT to Pending. I still walked in to office from MacPherson as traffic into Ubi is awful to say the least.

I have just reached, the time is: 9.59am

Marc

This post was last edited on 26 July 2011 at 12.20pm after it was first published.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

India’s External Affairs Minister: SG and India are “solid partners” and Delhi Chief Minister doesn’t speak for India

It was reported that the Ministry of Health (MOH) issued a statement…

改善刻板印象 创友善空间助失智患者融入社区

据英文媒体《海峡时报》报导,一项意见调查显示,四名失智症患者当中,有三名以上会感到被遗弃、孤单、羞愧和缺乏竞争力。 而让失智症患者产生负面情绪的主要原因,国人对失智症的不了解,产生刻板印象。 此项意见调查是由新加坡管理大学与新加坡阿兹海默症协会携手合作,于今年初开展,为期5周,邀请逾5600国人参与,其中包括失智症患者、看护者和一般民众。这是首个针对失智症开展的全国意见调查。 当中有32位患有失智症、1156名照顾者及4491名与失智症没有关联的普通民众。 国人对失智症的偏见颇深 研究显示,有30巴仙的照顾者对当众照顾失智症患者而感到难为情;56巴仙的受调者则认为失智症患者缺乏竞争力;不过也有90巴仙的人不认同失智症患者缺乏竞争力的观点。 研究也针对不同族群对失智症的刻板印象进行调查,结果显示家中无失智症相关的病人或对不从事相关行业的人,对失智症的有着最深的刻板印象。 其中,男性对失智症的刻板印象高于女性;而70岁以上的人存在较高的偏见;再来21岁到39岁的人,最后才是40岁到69岁的人。 为此,新加坡阿兹海默症协会执行董事Jason Foo认为:“研究证明刻板印象的存在一直都影响失智症患者与其家属的生活品质,故我们都应该要学习用正确的语言来表达,对失智症患者与家属提供更高的同理心,创造友善空间给失智症患者使失智症患者能够融入社区中。” 有超过57巴仙的民众对失智症的了解不足,至于他们在接触失智症患者是感到困惑;而近44巴仙的民众则对无法提供失智症任何帮助而感气馁;73巴仙的人认为他们仍有享受生活的权利,所以应改善失智症患者的生活品质。 “我们应努力改善失智症的刻板印象,他们仍可享有良好的生活品质,故应将焦点放在他们的能力而非不足之处。”Foo说道。…

Defence Cyber Chief: Whitehat hackers invited to hack MINDEF

The Ministry of Defence (MINDEF)’s Defence Cyber Chief, Mr David Koh, has…

“CPF has lost its credibility, the management of it” by late Dr. Toh Chin Chye in 1984

  On 29 Jun 1984, The then Minister for Health, Howe Yoon…