Andrew Loh/

“The problem that the HDB face is they are just short of rental flats. In the whole of Singapore today, we have about 45,000 rental flats. But that’s not enough.

“It’s quite clear in my mind, we need to ramp up the building of rental flats as quickly as we can. Not just by a few thousand, actually we need to build by tens of thousands. And the earlier the better.” – Mr Khaw Boon Wan, Minister for National Development (MND), 30 May, Today.

The revelation by Mr Khaw may be shocking to some, but perhaps not so to others. Mr Khaw’s predecessor at MND, Mr Mah Bow Tan, had previously pledged – in early 2011 – to build 7,500 more rental flats. Obviously this number is short of what is needed, given Mr Khaw’s revelation.

While more rental flats are welcome, especially by those in desperate need of them, and Mr Khaw should be applauded for tackling the problem head-on – something which his predecessor seemed to have been dragging his feet on – Mr Khaw should get right to the nub of the problem.

And what is it?

Mr Khaw should look into why so many are in need of such flats in the first place, and see if there are any ways to keep those who currently have flats to stay in them, instead of joining the rental queue. The numbers are not clear but one would suspect that at least a portion of these will include those who are defaulting or have defaulted on their HDB mortgage loans payment, and who may be forced by the HDB to put their flats up for sale. It would be good if Mr Khaw could reveal these numbers.

If HDB could work out a more compassionate payment plan for these, it could reduce the numbers for rental flats.

Also, the Town Councils Act was amended some years ago to empower town councils to repossess homes which have defaulted on service and conservancy charges. Again, these numbers are not disclosed, although it is suspected that there are not many whose flats have actually been put up for sale because of this.

Mr Khaw should also take a look at the qualifying criterias for such flats. Mr Mah’s adherence to strict rules was to prevent abuse of the system by those who do not really need these flats. However, by doing so, he had also allowed many to fall through the cracks. The presence of homeless communities spread out all over the major public parks in Singapore in 2009/2010 testified to this.

One of the things Mr Khaw and the HDB should seriously consider is to give families with children and the elderly priority in the queue. We have reported homeless families with children and the elderly (and even the sick) camped out in the parks. In a First World country like Singapore, it is unconscionable that such things should occur.

And since the government has promised to lower the number of foreigners into Singapore, perhaps Mr Khaw should also look into whether flats which were reserved for foreigners could be freed up for needy Singaporeans instead. Some flats which are acquired through the SERs or en bloc programme have been let out to foreigners, for example.

Lastly, the HDB and MND should be in constant communication with the Ministry for Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS) as well. Often, there seem to be a disconnect between the ministries. Cases referred to MCYS, which then approach the HDB, seem to be treated like any other appeal for rental flats. This should be relooked. Obviously, if MCYS finds it urgent or important enough to speak up for such cases, the HDB should adopt a more compassionate and flexible stand on these.

At the end of the day, while building more flats is welcome, ultimately it is the affordability of public housing flats which is at the heart of the matter. Thus, Mr Khaw should look at this and come up with a solution, especially for the low-income and the needy.

The HDB must return to its original aim of providing affordable flats to Singaporeans simply because it is the humane thing to do. Mr Khaw’s revelation that “tens of thousands of rental flats needed” shows that perhaps the HDB has deviated somewhat from this goal.

Why else would so many such cheap and low-end flats be needed, if flats were truly affordable?

 

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

詹时中体育基金会募款晚宴 募得逾17万元善款

昨晚,詹时中体育基金会募款晚宴在新加坡万豪董厦酒店举行,并成功募得超过17万新元善款。 詹时中体育基金会成立于2017年,旨在推动本地体育事业,让家境清寒但热爱运动的青少年,也有机会在体育领域发挥潜能。 自2017年创立以来,该基金会至少协助30名清寒运动员,协助他们在体育领域中实现理想。 詹时中和其妻子、前非选区议员罗文丽均为该基金会赞助人。 不过,据晚宴筹委会主席乔立盟指出,詹时中体育基金会的目标是每年需要至少50-90万元,才能有效推广各种活动和扶助更多清寒子弟。 故此在扶持本地青年体育运动上,前路仍艰巨。 除了昨晚的募款晚宴,今年二月也曾举办首届詹时中体育基金慈善盾杯球赛,为基金会募款;以及去年12月在水上表演游泳俱乐部,举办游泳接力赛。 晚宴邀请荣誉国务资政吴作栋当主宾,前波动巴西议员詹时中原本因疲惫无法出席,但活动结束前仍现身会场,并与与会者合照,与吴作栋等人握手。 吴作栋在致词时表示,相信体育的力量对新加坡的影响力,体育能团结人民,例如1970年代的马来西亚足球杯和“蝶王”约瑟林在2016年夺奥运金牌,说明体育能团结不同背景的人。 同时,他也赞扬詹时中是诚实、正派的政治家,尽管政见不同,惟詹一直在实践建设性政治,为我国文明国会辩论奠下基调。 除了吴作栋外,卫生部兼律政部高级政务部长唐振辉等人也受邀出席。

裕廊-金文泰市镇会指火患组屋消防栓 上月中旬才检查鉴定正常

日前武吉巴督武吉巴督21街的第210A组屋一单位发生火患,但居民揭发有消防喉无法运作,没来水可救火。 该区组屋由裕廊—金文泰市镇理事会负责。对此,民防部队本月8日向该市镇会发出的“消除火患隐忧通知书”(Fire Hazard Abatement Notice),市镇会有责任维修和保养消防设施,并保证这些设施能正常运作。若被发现重犯,将面对罚款甚至是被起诉。 民防部队在声明中指出,火患现场附近好几个消防栓都被锁头锁住;但即便民防人员当时撬开其中一个消防栓锁头,却发现水管根本喷不出水! 对此,裕廊-金文泰市镇会在今日回应《亚洲新闻台》,澄清有关消防栓刚在上月中旬被检查,被鉴定操作正常。 该市镇会指第210A组屋有64个消防栓,最后一次由承包商检查,是在上月14日。 不过市镇会表示接受民防部队的调查结果,即有关消防喉在火灾当天无法正常运作,“我们将调查原因,并采取适当行动。”不过,该市镇会未回应何以改组屋好几个消防栓被上锁。 民主党秘书长徐顺全也获悉裕廊-金文泰市镇会已回应此事,不过,徐顺全则质疑在火患当天早上,负责消防栓的承包商有被传召到现场,进行检查,惟报告表单则填写消防栓正常,故此要求当局澄清此事。

Food delivery and takeaway services amid pandemic not sustainable according to restaurant operators

To help contain the spread of COVID-19 pandemic, Prime Minister Lee introduced…

Migrant domestic workers in Singapore working in conditions akin to forced labour according to new report

In a report by the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) and…