Leong Sze Hian, Alex Lew /

“Nothing’s sacrosanct in Government review of policies.”PM Lee Hsien Loong.

I would like to applaud the Prime Minister for his bold changes to the cabinet.

I believe what Singaporeans would like to see going forward is what changes will be made to address the myriad of issues raised in the elections.

As about half a dozen Ministers have said that the PAP needs to be transformed, I would like to make the following suggestions to review HDB’s policies:-

1) Remove the income ceiling of $2,000 for two-room flats, as it makes the simplistic assumption that every household earning more than $2,000 can afford a three-room flat, regardless of the family size, financial circumstances, etc.

2) Reverse the policy change to increase the rental for households earning more than $800 after two years, as a family earning between $800 and $1,500, may already be finding it hard to make ends meet.

3) Review the policy change requiring those applying for a second HDB Concessionary Loan to utilise half of the previous flat’s cash profits as well as the entire CPF utilised including acccrued interest, regardless of how long ago was the previous flat’s sale.

4) Review the policy change to permanently bar those who have sold two HDB flats from renting a HDB flat, as it assumes that one can never be in financial difficulty after selling one’s flat.

5) Review the policy requiring divorced couples without children to return their HDB flat to the HDB if the flat was purchased for less than five years, based on HDB’s valuation.

6) Review the Resale Levy which for example, requires a cash levy of $50,000 for those who buy a second new flat, regardless of how long ago the previous five-room flat was sold.

7) Give priority to needy Singaporeans for rental flats, instead of having a HDB joint-venture private company to rent HDB flats to non-Singaporeans for profit.

8) Review the cash-over-valuation (COV) policy to allow banks to lend the COV amount as well subject to say a five per cent valuation cap, as I know of no country in the world that places such a huge financial obstacle to public housing ownership, particularly for the lower-income who may have more difficulty coming up with the cash COV.

9) Disclose the breakdown of the costs of building HDB flats. Consider gradually shifting the current Market Pricing Subsidy policy to a more balanced Cost-Plus Pricing policy like in the 1980s and before. The fact that it will take about 10 years for a new flat to be available in the resale market because of the BTO construction time and the five-year Minimum Occupation Period (MOP), may have a minimal effect on resale prices, and moderate price increases instead.

10) Review the policy requiring divorced couples to re-finance their HDB loan even when the court order results in one of the divorced spouses to keep the flat with his or her children. This may cause undue hardship, as the ability to take another housing loan is re-assessed. The existing HDB loan should be allowed to continue.

11) Review the very high 10 per cent penalty for engaged couples who want to withdraw their application as they do not wish to be married.

12) Review the current Build-to-order (BTO) policy of reserving 95 per cent for first-timers, and an unknown percentage for grassroots volunteers, as it makes it very difficult for second-timers such as those in financial difficulty or down-graders to ever get a new flat.

13) HDB Annual Reports’ ‘applications for financial assistance approved’ statistics, have disappeared from its 2005/2006 Annual Report onwards. These statistics should continue to be published.

14) Publish the statistics on the following:- How many HDB bank loans are in arrears over three months?

15) How many HDB bank loans have been foreclosed by banks?

16) How many foreigners and PRs in total are staying in SERS (Selective En-bloc Re-Development Scheme) HDB flats, former JTC, SIT, etc, flats as rental tenants?

17) How many Singaporean siblings below 35 successfully applied to buy HDB resale flats under the former ‘siblings’ policy which was terminated in March 2011. How may PR siblings have successfully applied?

18) How many HDB households were unable to pay their Service and Conservancy Fees (S&CC) in a year? How many have been charged in court for not paying, in a year?

I would like to urge and call upon all public housing stakeholders to work with and support our new National Development Minister, Mr Khaw Boon Wan, to reform our public housing.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

电梯按钮遭吐口水 新捷运报警促查

武汉冠状病毒疫情当前,人心惶惶,邻里都会相互提醒要保持卫生,但偏偏就有缺乏公德心的人士,刻意在电梯按钮上吐口水,是要恶心谁啊?! 新捷运周四(19日)傍晚在脸书上帖文,发现有人在朝盛港轻轨线(东)棕美站(Rumbia station)电梯内,朝电梯按钮吐口水。 当局表示,此行为在平常时期已经算是可恶行为,而在这非常时期更不只是恶作剧了,因此当局已经报警,会全面配合调查。 “我们向民众保证,已经清理了电梯,并且已经消毒。” 当局促请通勤者培养良好的个人卫生习惯,并且善待他人和各种公共用品,一起保持社区的安全。 网民纷纷谴责该恶心之举,并呼吁相关当局将采取对付行动。 有者认为不可轻易饶恕作恶者,应该将他送入牢中接受鞭刑,才能让他们谨记在心。 有者则认为应该将作恶者送去辅导,以便了解他做出有关举动的主要原因,否则他可能会在其他地方重复类似的行为。 有网民表示,在其他和组屋附近的轻快铁电梯内,如大巴窑1巷的157栋组屋电梯内,也曾经发生类似事件,并呼吁当局采取行动。

The summit of discontent

The G20 Summit didn’t satisfy many, but it has delivered useful results

抨击现有公共组屋政策 半辈子供房  最后一无所有

针对近期总理李显龙在国庆群众大会上,宣称将确保提供国人可负担的公共组屋、医疗服务和教育,让国人无需担心。 不过,在总理宣布了数项新政策后,仍令一些网民感到失望。 网民Calvin Goh认为现有公共住宅政策根本就不是“可负担”,我们几乎花大半辈子,把大部分积蓄花在上面,但是到最后,缺什么也不能传承给下一代。 “当你买下组屋并偿还房贷好些年,房子应该属于你的。但在新加坡,到最后房子却不属于你的。你只是偿还房租和长期住在那间组屋。供了这么多年房贷,但最后好多人还是一无所有,什么也不能传承给子孙后代。” 他提问:究竟新加坡属于谁的?国人的存在,是否就只是为了还房贷和贡献给政府?我们究竟是为了谁打拼? 公共住宅理应负担得起 我指的是公共组屋,或者公共住宅。至于私有产业不管是永久屋契还是租赁权,都属私人“拥有”,开放给本地或外国人购买(设定一些条规限定只有国人能购买土地财产),又或者较少法规限制。 他认为,建屋发展局的公共住宅,理应让民众负担得起或真正拥屋。但实际上只要看看售屋合同,就很明白所谓屋主其实都只是租户。 公共住宅理应让人民有瓦遮头,不应让国人对房屋产权有其他的猜测。“我不认为用20-40年偿还公共组屋房贷是可负担的。真正的可负担,指的是国人只需要数年时间,即5至10年就可清还所有房贷。” 如此,在清还房贷之后,国人才有余钱储蓄,或追求其他梦想。 但是,在现有制度下,国人几乎大部分收入都花在房贷,可是一旦屋契到期,价值归零。形同公积金一样,所有的价值只能看,却用不了。…