Andrew Loh /

On 11 April last year, three friends tried to help a taxi driver who was being heckled and assaulted by a group of four Caucasian men at the taxi stand at Suntec City Tower 5. Instead, the three do-gooders were pounced on by the Caucasian group, with two of them eventually having to be admitted to the hospital for treatment.

The incident took place around midnight that day. The Caucasian men, who were apparently drunk and “running around and swinging their glasses in the air” had approached a taxi. The driver declined to pick them up as he was waiting for another passenger. The group then started to heckle the driver and jumped on the bonnet of the car. Eventually they punched the driver and dragged him out of the car and wanted to drive off.

This seemed to set off a series of events which led to the eventual assault of three passers-by who tried to help the taxi driver. (Read TNP report here and here.)

Mr Laurence Wong, one of the three men, had helped the police by providing as much information as he could, even revisiting the scene of the assault one week later to take pictures on which he marked out where the assault took place, and where the closed-circuit cameras were located. He also managed to obtain pictures and identify three of the four assailants who he suspected, from the formal attire they had on, had been attending an event at Suntec City earlier that night.

He said he handed the information to the police to help them speed up the investigation.

However, one year on, a police spokesman – who described the incident as a “scuffle” – said “investigations are still ongoing”, according to the 11 May 2011 report by The New Paper (TNP).

From what Mr Wong told TNP and The Online Citizen (TOC), the incident, which happened past-midnight on 11 April 2010, seemed more than just a scuffle and a serious assault involving multiple assailants. Mr Paul Louis Liew, one of the three men who tried to help the taxi driver, was “slammed” against the “sharp corner of [a] pillar twice” and was kicked in his head after he had fallen down. “That was when I heard a very loud ‘pop’ sound,” Mr Wong tells TOC. “As if a small balloon burst under pressure… I heard Paul giving out a loud and long sigh seconds after the ‘pop’ sound.” Mr Wong describes how blood was “pouring out from [Mr Liew’s] forehead.”

Ah Heng, one of the three friends, was badly beaten as well. Mr Wong recalls: “Another Caucasian pounced on Ah Heng and kept punching him on his face. Ah Heng fell on the ground and the Caucasian man kept kicking Ah Heng on his face (while he was lying helpless on the floor). I can clearly remember what he said while kicking Ah Heng.” Mr Wong relates the vulgarities the man used each time he laid blows on Ah Heng’s face.

One of the alleged assailants in the taxi

Since the incident, the friends have inquired about the status of the investigation several times with the police. When they asked again in January, they were told that the case has been submitted to the Attorney-General’s Office. When the friends asked if the four culprits were still in Singapore, they said they were told that they are but that “they are allowed to leave the country as and when they want”, according to Mr Wong.

“Just in February, my girlfriend and I saw the Caucasian man (who had assaulted Paul) drunk and disturbing local girls in Clark Quay,” Mr Wong says. “He was with a group of Caucasian men at that time. They were singing and shouting at the top of their voices, while the locals just shy away [from them]. I didn’t want to approach him due to our personal safety.”

“Did they think that nothing will happen to them because the law has not caught up with them yet after more than a year?”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

骨痛热症“袭击”波东巴西 乔立盟促司徒宇斌交代

就波东巴西遭骨痛热症肆虐,新加坡人民党主席乔立盟(Jose Raymond),要求该区国会议员司徒宇斌给个交代。 据国家环境局(NEA)官网资料显示,波东巴西及周边地区,如比达达利、信立(Sennett)和阳伯台(Youngberg Terrace)周边地区,已出现超过500个骨痛热症集点区。 乔立盟昨日(6月18日)在脸书发帖,针对当地骨痛热症疫情要求“紧急关注”,并呼吁将知会当地民众有关应采取的行动。随着在5月份骨痛热症病例持续升高,乔立盟当时就曾在脸书上分享了两次相关资讯。 他在帖文中写道,“波东巴西的骨痛热症问题亟需受到关注,并且需要知会民众有关遏止疫情传染和爆发的措施”。 他引述了司徒宇斌在《新报》上的评论,即“我们认为住宅区附近的建筑工地是肇因”、“我们需要居民的合作以保持卫生”,并指国家环境局的数据推翻了有关言论。 帖文中,乔立盟指出,据国家环境局,84巴仙的蚊虫温床在住宅区内被发现,而并非建筑工地或大集点区的公共场所。“且已确定的,病例暴增还可能是因为群众对骨痛热症第三型病毒(DENV-3)的免疫力底下,而这类型病毒案例自今年初就开始增加。” 他还补充道,“自去年底开始,第三型病毒病例持续攀升,它在我国过去30年从未大规模流行,导致免疫力低下,而传播迅速。” 我国今年至今已有1万1000起骨痛热症病例,是我国50年来最糟糕的纪录。 乔立盟也询问道,在冠状病毒19肆虐期间,是否对骨痛热症采取防疫措施。“虽然在上个月(5月)的议会中,有回应了关于冠毒疫情期间的骨痛热症防疫课题,但是我们仍然面对速度惊人的骨痛热症传播率,尤其是在波东巴西一带,因此希望能够获得当局采取紧急行动,以及明确的防疫措施。”

估计10万工友所得少于最低薪资 林志蔚:政府渐进式薪制无助改善处境

对于有者不同意新加坡工人党倡议最低薪金制,老本行是经济学家的盛港候任议员林志蔚,发文比较最低薪金制和渐进式薪金模式的差异。 他分析政府推出的渐进式薪金模式把薪资和工作职能绑定,也给了雇主更很多空间“省成本”,且没有考量到劳资之间的权力差异。再者,对于那些无法提升技能的工友,只能继续生活在低工资的处境,“事实上,据我们估计,有10万名工友薪资少于最低薪资,显然渐进式模式对他们无效。” 他在文中指出,最低薪资制尽管不是毫无疑问的好政策,但他是立足于证明,能改善雇员处境的良好开端。而在英美国家,所有的综合分析(meta- analyses)也显示,最低薪资制实则对于雇员就业问题,几乎没有影响。 而近期的研究,也倾向支持最低薪资制,即时薪资涨幅很大,对于低薪工友的就业问题实则带来冲击微小。 过去,本地反对最低薪资制的论述,不外乎认为这将造成雇主不愿聘用更多低薪工友、恐加剧失业问题等。前内阁部长、职总前秘书长的林文兴,曾认为最低薪资并无法改善低收入群体的困境。他也为此议题与巡回大使许通美教授论战。 林志蔚本身也是位经济学家,拥有美国哈佛大学历史学硕士、美国加利福尼亚大学圣克鲁兹分校国际经济学、哲学博士资历,目前也是ESSEC商学院经济学副教授。 不过,他也提出在推出最低薪资政策前,应设定评估框架和独立的最低薪检讨委员会,根据本地的情况作出调整。 至于谁该为最低薪资制买单?有者认为政府会为此付出代价,但林志蔚则解释,实际上他不会带来财政影响,可能由七成由消费者支付更高价格、三成由雇主承担。但他认为,关键在于,要把谈判薪资的权力,从资本方重新分配给劳动力。 “我认为我们可以承担一些费用,来照顾社会上较不富裕 群体,随着消费者比最低薪资工友多,对价格的影响也就减少。”

11年来出售3.6万假文凭! 印度一所大学遭当地警方检举

据印度当地媒体《印度时报》报导,当地位于喜马偕尔邦索兰(Solan)城市的一所大学,被当地执法机构发现11年来”贩卖“多达3万6千份假文凭,为此准备从澳洲引渡有关大学基金会的主席一家。 有关大学是玛纳夫巴迪(Manav Bharti)大学,由同名慈善基金会所运营。据报导,当局发现该大学,在所发出的4万1千份文凭,只有5千份是真材实料的。 为此,当地警方准备引渡身在澳洲的基金会主席Raj Kumar Rana一家。此事件曝光,也让当地民众质疑,有关基金会所运营的其他学府,是否也涉及或参与出售假文凭。 至于Raj Kumar Rana一家的相关土地、房产、建筑和存款等,已在防洗黑钱法下暂被充公。印度执法机构也相信,基金会主席一家可能在过程积累了38.7亿卢比(折合7千万新元)的财产。 一些领英账号声称曾就读玛纳夫巴迪大学 不过,本社在知名求职和人才招聘网站领英(LinkedIn)搜寻,发现确实有一些领英账号,在简介中提及曾在玛纳夫巴迪大学就读,且自称目前在新加坡工作。 不过,他们如何在这所学府取得文凭则不得而知,以及新加坡当局将如何审核有关学府毕业生的求职申请。…

“新加坡大热卖”今年停办

冠状病毒疫情持续,为了国人的健康安全着想,本年度的“新加坡大热卖”暂停。 大热卖的主办方今天(5月3日)在脸书上帖文,指出今年的活动暂停,明年恢复举办,将为本地和外国客户提供最佳的新加坡网络和实体购物体验。 当局呼吁会员们实现多元化的网上销售营业,并产生出新的销售渠道,为跨国界的网上销售做好准备。