Andrew Loh /

The General Elections have resulted in what PM Lee called “epochal” changes to the Cabinet. We have seen 2 Senior Ministers, the Minister Mentor, and 6 other ministers stepping down from the Cabinet.

The GE also saw historic achievements by the opposition parties which collectively brought the PAP’s vote share to its lowest since Independence. The Workers’ Party managed to do what many had thought unthinkable – breaking through the iron wall of the GRC system. The WP now has 8 MPs in the new Parliament. Mrs Chiam from the Singapore People’s Party is the 9th opposition MP.

PM Lee has said he wants to listen to the people. So did other ministers. While skeptics and critics of the PAP government were quick to question the PAP’s sincerity, it would perhaps be more important and productive to see how we as citizens can hold the PAP, and PM Lee in particular, to their words.

After all, citizens too have a responsibility and a role to play in effecting the changes that they want to see.

Yes, reform, renewal and change are not new ideas or goals the PAP is offering. Throughout the years, these have been constant promises. One of the most memorable instances was after the 2001 GE where the so-called “Super Seven” newly-elected MPs were inducted into the PAP and made ministers. Some of them have, in some people’s eyes, failed – such as Raymond Lim who has stepped down as Transport Minister and from the Cabinet, and MCYS’s Vivian Balakrishnan who has now been posted to the Ministry of Environment and Water Resources.

But others have performed credibly, most notable of which is Tharman Shanmugaratnam who now is given several meaty and heavy portfolios.

But a switching of personnel does not equate to reform, as some have said. This is true. But one should not expect reform or policy changes to take place immediately. More probably these will take time and this is how it should be. After all, we want the changes to result in better policies, not worse ones. And to do this will take time.

Where citizens can do their part is to keep highlighting the flaws and failings of government policies. But to do this in a meaningful way, leaving aside the diatribes and personal smears for these do not achieve anything.

The elections have ended and we as Singaporeans should see the road ahead and realise that we are all traveling on the same road, trying to get to the same destination. Along the way, we argue and, to use Low Thia Khiang’s analogy, we may even “slap” the driver. But, and I am sure this is what Mr Low meant and he will agree with me, we “slap” the driver because we do not want him to drive us off course and into a ravine.

In other words, we want the best for Singapore and our fellow Singaporeans.

The Cabinet changes are a positive outcome of the elections, and the new Parliament holds promise.

As citizens, we are not outside of the arena. We are an integral part of it. And as such, we should take this opportunity to put forth our views, our worries and concerns, our hopes and expectations, to the government – and do so with respect, especially when we disagree vehemently with the government.

So yes, it is time to go beyond just compllaining and step up and help drive Singapore forward.

The job does not belong to just a select few.

There are various ways to go about being involved, which I shall leave for everyone to highlight and to discuss.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Photos of PAP rally at Buangkok 28th April 2011

photos by Priscilla Chia and Joshua Chiang  

MOM: CPF savings for retirement income and not serve as investment instrument

A member of the public Whing Yeok Leng wrote to ST Forum…

为医罹癌妻丈夫申请转移公积金存款遭拒 人权律师批形同“剥夺他人生存权”

2016年12月,47岁的印裔妇女莎若吉妮,被诊断患有卵巢癌,他们一家为此饱受煎熬,财务状况也陷困顿。 丈夫苏利亚希望能治好妻子的病,向中央公积金局申请,将自己的普通和特别户头存款,转移到妻子的保健储蓄(medisave)户头,好让妻子能继续抗癌。 但是,公积金局拒绝了苏利亚的要求。 莎若吉妮表示,当她得知自己罹患癌症的噩耗,感到很绝望,但她有活下去的意愿,也感谢家人们一路扶持。她的癌症是侵略性的,她必须经历数次的化疗,但即便这样癌细胞近期还是复发了。 妻子已用光公积金积蓄 为了治病和住院,如今她已没有多少公积金积蓄,而且如今已动用丈夫的保健储蓄,已经没有多余的钱来应付医疗开销。 莎若吉妮是在私人医院接受治疗。“此前曾前往国立大学医院征询第二意见,但是后者只是建议:尽量带你妻子到能让她感到开心的地方,也意即他们没有把握医好我。” 她说别无选择下,她只能回到伊丽莎白私人医院就诊,她强调她不是为了奢侈享受,而是该医院至少尽力确保她能活下去。 丈夫苏利亚在接受采访时表示,公积金局不赞同让他提取普通和特别户头的存款,作为治疗妻子的医疗费用。 “即便我告诉他们,我的保健储蓄已经用光了,但他们有条例需遵守,仍不同意我使用上述户头存款。” “我的妻子在受苦,我留着存款何用?” “当我的妻子在受苦,那我留着存款又有何用?我的妻子就是我的一切。”…

Workers’ Party should aim to win one-thirds of Parliamentary seats to avoid “a wipe-out with no elected opposition”: WP chief Pritam Singh

Workers’ Party (WP) should target and secure at least one-thirds of Parliamentary…