Benjamin Cheah / photos by Jean Loo

Sound and fury were the order of the night at the Singapore People Party’s rally. The speakers engaged the audience with humour, mixed with jabs at the People’s Action Party (PAP). The crowd cheered with every mention of the SPP, Secretary General Mr Chiam See Tong, and Potong Pasir candidate Mrs Lina Chiam; and booed whenever the PAP was mentioned. The speakers worked up the crowd to a fever pitch, keeping them there until the rally ended.

Mr Sim Kek Tong, chairman of the SPP and candidate for Hong Kah North, kicked off the evening with a speech in Chinese. He criticized the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) and Group Representative Constituency (GRC) schemes, and proposed replacing GRCs with Single-Member Constituencies. Mr Jimmy Lee, who will be contesting in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, spent his speech praising the people of Potong Pasir and Mr Chiam, and slamming the PAP for withdrawing funds for upgrading projects in Potong Pasir. He concluded by challenging the PAP to issue the same threat in Hong Kah North and Bishan-Toa Payoh.

Mr Mohamad Hamim bin Aliyas started with a speech in Malay. The crowd quieted down; most of the audience is Chinese. The Chiams arrived in the middle of this speech, and the crowd burst into cheers and chants of ‘SPP!’ and ‘Chiam See Tong!’ Excitement rippled through the crowd as the Chiams took the stage. A man in a wheelchair, a little girl and a middle-aged woman took turns to garland them. After the Chiams settled down, Mr Hamim completed his speech, and made another in English. He repeated the points he made in the last rally on the lack of government accountability and transparency, as well as ministerial salaries and unchecked influx of foreigners. He mooted the idea of having Singaporeans representing Singapore in sports, to loud cheers and applause.

On Friday, Mr Wilfred Leung promised to talk about Mr Sitoh Yipin, the PAP candidate for Potong Pasir. This was the theme of his speech, criticising Mr Sitoh for not doing anything for the residents, and the PAP for refusing to grant funds to upgrade Potong Pasir. The crowd booed and jeered with increasing intensity at every mention of the PAP and Mr Sitoh. Mr Leung praised the people of Potong Pasir, saying, “There is no price to pay for the soul of Potong Pasir!” This was met with cheers and applause.

Benjamin Pwee based his speech on two themes: listening and security. He said that the opposition will listen to the people’s voice, unlike the PAP. ‘There is nothing to fear for Singapore’s security if you vote for the opposition’, he said. Referring to Singapore’s Total Defence concept, he assured the audience that the opposition will ensure Singapore’s security. The military would defend all Singaporeans, regardless of political affiliations. Everybody, regardless of race and religion, could live in peace with each other. The opposition would listen to investors to ensure funds are invested wisely. Most of all, he emphasized the need to rid oneself of fear. ‘We need to dare to get rid of the fear that holds us back,’ he said. ‘Dare to vote because you are Singaporean!’ The crowd erupted into cheers at that remark.

The rally, however, belonged to the Chiams. Mr Chiam mounted the podium to much fanfare. He began his speech with, ‘I’m afraid you have to be quiet because my voice is not so good.’ Members of the audience immediately shush each other. This silence was not to last. Every other sentence Mr Chiam said was interrupted by ear-splitting cheers. He said he is contesting Bishan-Toa Payoh ‘to promote democracy in Singapore’, and that democracy cannot exist ‘without opposition in Parliament’. Thanking the crowd for their support, he added, “The people shall not be bullied any more. Everyone will be treated equally.”

Mrs Chiam spent the first half of her speech detailing how the PAP had treated Mr Chiam and the people of Potong Pasir, by discontinuing bus service 141, denying children places in PAP Community Foundation kindergartens, and kept Mass Rapid Transport stations around Potong Pasir closed. She also took issues with Mr Sitoh, saying that he took credit for the recent lift upgrading project even though the residents and town council of Potong Pasir paid for it.

Near the end, Mrs Chiam spoke briefly about her policy positions. She advocated more subsidies for childcare and healthcare for the elderly, with emphasis on early detection of diseases. She promised to look into the problems of Sennett estate, even though they do not pay service and maintenance charges to the Potong Pasir Town council. Finally, she said that senior citizens should be able to use their concession cards at all times, instead of only during concession hours.

Before the rally began, the SPP distributed fliers detailing the party’s stance on public housing. In the flier, the party raised issues with rising prices of flats, pointing out the average new family would have to support ageing parents and young children in addition to paying off a 30-year loan, causing them to be income-poor. The SPP proposed five points:

  1. Commission a study on the effects of public housing on the open market.
  2. Push the government to make public housing statistics and information available.
  3. De-link public housing prices from private housing market prices.
  4. Push for a balance between affordable housing and reserve building.
  5. Assert that the income gap can be mitigated through public housing program, though not at current prices.

The rally was more focused on generating buzz and rousing the crowd than proposing ideas. The speeches were more engaging than the previous night’s rally, perhaps as part of a shift in strategy. The adoration in the air was palpable. The rally, however, risks coming across as too shallow, by focusing on bashing the PAP and uplifting the candidates without actually delivering concrete ideas. This could signal a shift in the SPP’s strategy towards a more emotive-based form of campaigning. How well it works remains to be seen.

 

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Tony Tan promises to not be a ‘Super MP’

by: Jewel Philemon/ The 2011 Presidential Election’s first lunchtime rally was kicked…

大陆律师赴港“兼听”反送中 疑遭压力匆匆离港

上月中旬,一名中国律师充当公民记者,只身一人闯入香港,希望能了解香港反送中运动的缘由和当地居民的诉求,也出席建制派和民主派两边人马的集会。不过仅逗留香港第三天,相信是感受到压力,陈秋实终被迫离港。 他在8月中抵达香港,在8月17日的视频,声称观察到香港社会生活”小日子仍在继续”,依然“其乐融融”,没有受到特别影响;他也喜欢香港多元文化的生态。 他续指,内地媒体和香港媒体报导有天壤之别,例如那位眼睛被打伤的女孩,香港媒体指被警察橡皮子弹打伤;大陆媒体说她是被自己的猪队友打伤的。“可她的猪队友怎么会有枪和橡皮子弹呢?” 机场被打的的付国豪,大陆媒体说是《环球时报》记者,而香港媒体说他是“国保特工”;元朗车站拿棍打人的白衣人,大陆媒体说成是爱国青年,香港媒体则质疑他们是收了钱的黑社会。 对此,陈秋实认为,在信息杂乱的环境下,就更加需要兼听则明,偏听则暗,要收集足够多的信息进行交叉比对,才能够尽可能的还原事情的真相。 在另一视频中,他指自己出席了香港建制派和民主派的集会,并与他们当中2、30人交流,他坦言双方在观念上存在巨大冲突,但又似乎有一些共识,例如两派均认为香港依旧是安定繁荣的幸福城市。 “香港医疗、教育、养老成本仍较低” “而事实上也确实如此,香港GDP和人均福利在全亚洲仍保持领先,每年大陆外资投资当中,有50、60巴仙都是来自香港,或从香港进入大陆。” 他也解释,香港民众在医疗、教育、养老成本仍是比较低的。每年依旧有很多大陆的富豪或是中产阶级申请移民香港,或来香港生孩子、打疫苗、买保险。 大陆人经常会想什么事情都是钱、经济层面的问题,但陈秋实分析,经济型因素,在香港街头民主政治确实占一定的比例,但并不是绝对。 大陆网民揶揄香港“吃饱了撑的才搞街头民主”,对此陈秋实说:”这么理解也可以,因为香港确实已不存在吃不上饭的穷人。” 陈秋实也解释道港人抗争的背景,包括争取选举权、争取特首、议员的真正普选等。此外,有不厌其烦地在视频中,向大陆网民解释何谓“和理非”、“勇武”和“不割席”等。也透过视频向中国网民展示他在集会现场的所见所闻。…

On social visit pass but arrested for rioting

Post by theonlinecitizen. By Andrew Loh When 28-year old Arun Kaliamurthy visited…

Burmese citizens denied renewal of visas in Singapore

S’pore authorities keeps mum about reasons.