The following is Mr Chiam See Tong’s response to the Budget 2011.

BUDGET STATEMENT 2011

This is an election Budget.

The strategy is that of the US use during the pacific war against the Japanese whenever they want to take an island, the Americans will bombard that island with heavy artillery from the sea and dropped bombs from the air until the island’s defenses have become ineffective, then the Americans land their troops to physically occupy the island.

Similarly the ruling party will soften the ground and the constituencies with attractive goodies and sweeteners during the election period, even more so on the actual election year.

This year’s budget did not address the major problems that our country is still currently facing particularly rising cost inflation.

Cost of living (General)

Source: pbase.com


Public housing, healthcare, transport, basic foodstuffs, and even ERP has increased drastically but the salary of the lower and middle income earners have not increased to the extent and most of the Singaporeans is undergoing turmoil in the current situation.

The government should take a drastic step to lower the cost of living. The government should review the GST and may consider abolishing GST for some basic necessities.

It should control the influx of foreigners so that Singaporeans have more employment opportunities.

Minimum salary levels for Singaporeans should be recommended by the trade unions depending on the cost of living.

Public Housing

HDB should change the policy to sell the HDB flats at cost-plus pricing instead of market based pricing. Any grants or subsidy granted is just a shot term solution.The government should do more in making the public housing affordable for the Singaporeans. Is there any review for the pricing of public housing under consideration by Ministry of National Development?

Medical Care

It is ever increasing.

Despite all the top-ups in the medisave account, it is insufficient for a lower or even middle income to manage the health cost.

Not enough beds in the hospital, long waiting time for appointments and walk in are some of the common problem the public are being faced on day to day basis.

Does the government have any concrete plans to improve on these services?

How is the government going to tackle the ever rising healthcare cost?

I would expect the healthcare cost to be lowered and be affordable to our citizens rather than catering to well off foreign patients who inevitably raise up the cost of medical care.

Chiam See Tong

1st March 2011

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Plenty good news for SGs: Estate upgrading, Fair hiring, No ERP, NTUC freezes prices, $1 breakfast set

There were many good news for Singaporeans delivered through the mainstream media…

New Govt powers – access to personal income status without consent

Under new legislations for the implementation of the Medishield Life scheme, which…

方荣发质问:《防假消息法》如何避免执政政府涉散播假消息?

工人党议员方荣发昨日(5月8日)于国会中询问,指《防止网络假消息与网络操纵》法案,赋予现任政府裁定假消息的绝对权力,其对选举结果的影响不能被低估。当权者能以“社会公众利益”之名,要求撤下来自政治对手的不利言论,甚至会对选举结果带来巨大的影响。 “政府也可能散播假消息” 方荣发说,“最大的恐惧是来自于一些人以现任政府的意向,故意做出了对事实的虚假陈述,来影响选举的结果,甚至是形塑公众舆论与观点。散播假消息者,也可能来自现任政府本身。那请问法案当中,是否有针对该情况提出相对应的方案或保障吗?” 他以2015的大选中举例,在竞选期最后一刻,人民行动党竞选机器向榜鹅东区选民发出信件,指该选区于2013年的一笔约2千250万元转账到工人党市镇会的款项,却不知去向,信中强调,该项声明是无可非议的事实。然而上述陈述却与每年的审计报告不符。 方荣发表示,显然该陈述被捏造出来,仅仅是为了影响2015年的选举结果。 方荣发也反问,《防假消息法》应如何起到保护作用,尤其是如果执政党在选举最后一刻散播假消息,媒体也照本宣科,届时也来不及向民众澄清事实。 他举例,若在大选期间,有内幕人对现任领导高层作出严重人身指控,并质疑他们的诚信与品格是否有资格带领国家。在《防假消息法》下,部长、主管机关、代理机关也可以公众利益之由,轻易将其撤下。 承上所诉,方荣发认为消息被撤下,但无人能说明究竟涉案部长和内幕人孰是孰非,到底谁才是在陈述事实。他也反问,《防假消息法》,是否也能被用来封锁、噤声这类能让选民知情、左右选民决定的资讯? 方荣发质问:新法能阻止执政政府散播假消息? 方荣发也向律政部长尚穆根追问,部长是否同意《防假消息法》,也无法避免现任政府涉及散播假消息以影响选举结果,就像上述提及的2015年大选发生的事件一样。 尚穆根则回应,《防假消息法》旨在对付那些可能动摇机构(institution)的假消息,至于那些可能影响行动党或工人党的假消息,无论是谁在散播,则不涵盖在《防假消息法》下,“可能可援引《防止骚扰法令》(POHA),而不是《防假消息法》(POFMA)”。 方荣发持续敦促法案应涵盖大选期间所散播的假消息。对此,尚穆根以“已给出最佳说法”,没有正面回应方荣发的提问。

Relationship programme based on rigorous research: American researcher

The “It’s Uncomplicated” programme which has been in the news this week…