Press Release: Universal Periodic Review of Burma: Total Denial in the Face of Widespread and Systematic Human Rights Violations

Burma Forum on the Universal Periodic Review (BF-UPR)

Assistance Association for Political Prisoners Burma (AAPP-B), Arakan Rivers Network (ARN), Burma Fund UN Office, Burma Lawyers’ Council (BLC), Chin Human Rights Organization (CHRO), Emergency Act Team vs Backpack Health Worker Team, Federation of Trade Unions of Burma (FTUB), Foundation for Education and Development (FED), Human Rights Education Institute of Burma (HREIB), Human Rights Foundation of Mon Land (HURFOM), Kachin Women’s Organization Thailand (KWAT), Kaladan Press Bangladesh, Shwe Gas Movement, Women and Child Rights Project (WCRP)

27 January 2011

Today, the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva examined Burma’s human rights record as part of its first Universal Periodic Review (UPR). Burma’s ruling military regime sent a large delegation to Geneva, led by Deputy Attorney General Dr. Tun Shin, who categorically denied state-orchestrated widespread, systematic and persistent human rights violations against the people of Burma.

Throughout the three-hour UPR dialogue, States raised numerous concerns, including the issue of political prisoners, treatment of ethnic and religious minorities, and impunity for perpetrators of gross human rights violations that may amount to crimes against humanity. Despite well-documented evidence to the contrary, the Burmese delegation said that, “Accusations of rape against ethnic women are baseless, with the aim of discrediting armed forces.” They claimed, “The armed forces have a zero tolerance policy towards serious human rights violations, including sexual violence,” and that “There is no widespread occurrence of human rights violations with impunity.”

More than 2,190 people are languishing in Burma’s prisons for peacefully exercising their basic civil and political rights, but the Director General of Prisons Zaw Win said, “They are imprisoned because they have breached prevailing laws, not because of their political beliefs.” He even went as far as to claim that, “There are no prison deaths resulting from torture.” However, the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners Burma, a member of the Burma Forum on the Universal Periodic Review (BF-UPR), has documented the deaths of 146 political prisoners in detention since 1988, due to torture and denial of medical treatment.

Representatives of the BF-UPR, a coalition of fourteen human rights and civil society organizations, were in Geneva for the Review.

BF-UPR representative Aung Myo Min said, “The military regime’s dismissal of any criticism of its human rights record and their refusal to even acknowledge the abuses that are taking place underscores the urgent need for an international independent investigation into allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Establishing a UN-mandated Commission of Inquiry is an essential first step to ending the culture of impunity and deterring human rights violations.

“Despite the claims made in the regime’s National Report to the UPR that the rights to freedom of religion and non-discrimination are guaranteed under law, Burma’s ethnic and religious minorities face ongoing persecution as part of a state policy of forced assimilation,” added BF-UPR representative Salai Ling.

In its National Report, the regime also claimed it is “bringing about balanced development… to enable the national races to enjoy the benefit of development”. BF-UPR representative Paul Sein Twa said, “The right to free, prior and informed consent is denied in Burma, so large-scale development initiatives like dams and extractive projects rarely benefit affected communities. They disrupt local livelihoods, and lead to further impoverishment.  In reality such development projects have resulted in gross human rights violations, including mass displacement and forced labour, especially in ethnic areas.”

Meanwhile, it is deeply disappointing that all nine member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) chose to commend the regime on its 7 November elections as a positive development while failing to address the ongoing humanitarian crisis in eastern Burma as a result of intensified armed conflict since the elections, which has caused thousands of refugees to flee into neighbouring countries. Their expressions of support on the implementation of the 7-Step Roadmap is also of particular concern, as the Roadmap fails to genuinely include all stakeholders in the country, and has resulted in a deeply flawed Constitution that enshrines impunity and fails to meet international human rights norms and standards.

The Burma Forum on the Universal Periodic Review urges the military regime to act now and immediately halt all human rights violations and accept the numerous recommendations made during the Review including: immediately and unconditionally releasing all political prisoners; reforming the judiciary; ratifying and effectively implementing all international human rights treaties; ensuring full rights to ethnic and religious minorities both in law and in practice; and in particular, the establishment of a Commission of Inquiry in line with the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar’s recommendation, as proposed by the Czech Republic.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Amendments to the CPF Act – did you know?

Leong Sze Hian – I refer to media reports (“Second chance to…

Chee Soon Juan : Free trade deals – we've been had

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) Secretary-General Dr Chee Soon Juan has written a…

Pastor Derek Hong apologises for misusing pulpit

“My actions on the pulpit have aroused some tension in this saga,” he says.

乔立盟:电动滑板车禁令 彰显政府政策规划模式欠佳

“电动滑板车被禁在人行道上路引起的抱怨,使我得出一个结论,即政府在接触利益相关者和建立政策共识方面,仍有许多需深入考量的问题。” 人民党主席乔立盟在20日于脸书发文,对政府在处理电动滑板车议题的手法,表达观点。 从颁布禁令到生效仅短短24小时,令近7千名使用电动滑板车的送餐员感到消息太突然和震惊,乔立盟认为,这显示那些生计直接受影响的群体,在政策制定方面并没有很好地获得咨询。 乔立盟强调,固然行人的安全需优先考量,因此可以理解政府 ,然而他也指出,在指定政策上与相关受影响群体进行沟通也很重要,特别是当政策会影响到他人生计时。 特别是对于那些低收入者来说,政策若突然转变,失去收入甚至对他们的家庭生活成本带来严重后果。 故此,乔立盟也质问,在发布政策前,政府可曾尝试去接触那些送餐员以及相关送餐服务公司,了解他们对政策改革的看法?或者政府可曾审视规范电动滑板车骑士执照,以减少相关事故? 再者,在发布禁令前,对于其他国会议员如工人党和官委议员等,是否曾咨询他们的意见? 此外,乔立盟也促政府反思,在数码化社会下如何在公共政策决策过程中咨询群众。 他提及总理李显龙曾在2013年对公共服务领袖说过:“政府必须改变政策制定的方式,不能再“闭门造车”(making policy in…