KJ

Singapore is a safe city, we like to say. Say it often enough, loudly enough, and strangely, it becomes actual enough, safe in our factual fantasy.

Singapore is a safe city, because there is ‘an absence of desperate poverty’, says Kishore Mahbubani.[1] Singapore is a safe city, because ‘the government has created an ‘ecosystem’ that resulted in this high level of personal safety.’ In safe city Singapore, there is low crime, few murders. Singaporeans earn their daily bread, diligently, honestly, safely. Because of the government, there’s enough bread to go around, unlike places like Switzerland and New York City, where Mr Kishore Mahbubani was almost mugged mercilessly. Singapore is a safe city.

***

Singapore is a safe city. The mornings are calm and the streets are orderly. We’re not like those willy-nilly liberal democracies, where crazy rioters run amok almost, like, daily. We have little patience for such fluffy frivolities. Singapore is a safe city. Three’s a crowd and two’s a company, and one is now an illegal assembly. Ask for permission to speak publicly, lest you be rounded into prison, seething privately. Refrain from speaking up for the downtrodden, like foreign workers or the Opposition, however they tempt you seditiously, for you might be detained, indefinitely, by Internal Security.

***

Singapore is a safe city because of its ‘tough attitudes on law and order’, says Kishore Mahbubani. In safe city Singapore, we whip teenage boys for being teenage boys, and we hang drug mules on transit, young as a foal, foolish as the young. No foreign president or prime minister can persuade a presidential pardon. Because Singapore is a safe city. What is one death amidst so much safety? Safe city Singapore depends on draconian laws executed punitively. Laws that hover above our city, keeping Singapore safe, safe-keeping our thriving economy, compromising neither sovereignty nor survivability.

***

Singapore is a safe city. We’re an international financial centre, located strategically in a region of endless opportunities. Billions of dollars of private wealth funds are parked here safely. VIPs visit us regularly, like Burma’s Prime Minister General Soe Win, and Zimbabwe’s Mr Mugabe. Singapore is a safe city. Dictators and their cronies come here for our medical facilities, our shopping and dining activities. Singapore is a safe city. Get well soon and enjoy our hospitality, beloved friends and unnamable cronies. The holiday will do you good, surely. Singapore is a safe city. The powerful are protected, and the powerful go scot-free. All these are made known publicly. There is no lack at all of transparency.

***

Singapore is a safe city. There are no famines, tsunamis, or other unthinkable catastrophes. Our water is safe to drink, and our enemies are kept at bay. Singapore is a safe city. There are no wars here, as NS is made compulsory. We have a strong and mighty army, standing and waiting, ever on the ready. Singapore is a safe city. Except, maybe, when army boys die while on serious duty. Killed by a grenade or collided with a frigate, dunked by compatriots or crushed by a Rover. But all these are rather secondary, really, because Singapore is a safe city, must be a safe city. That’s why NS is made compulsory – a dire necessity – even if our boys might die while on peace-time duty. It’s all for the sake of our beloved country, Singapore, the safe, safe, city.

***

Singapore is a safe city. The government plays it safe, and safety measures are taken seriously. Key institutions of the state, from the bureaucracy to the judiciary to the universities, are bosom buddies of our unique democracy. Our main and only press is headed by a former minister, and our newspaper editors are hired from our spy agencies. Singapore is a safe city, and safety measures are taken seriously. Even when our first-rate bureaucracy has been deemed sloppy: ‘Lax in managing public funds and opt for convenience’, thunders the Auditor-General fiercely. It seems more like a dereliction of duty, but it is not the civil servants’ fault, surely. Because Singapore is a safe city, and our bookish bureaucracy is only playing it safe. Imbibing the safety manual, going by the book, prudently, meekly, safely.

***

Singapore is a safe city. But ‘despite all our successes’, Singaporeans ‘should not be complacent’, says Kishore Mahbubani. Indeed, we must not. We must be on our toes and we must pull up our socks. But we must also toe the line, and we must not rock the boat too much. Otherwise, waves of clear and present danger will arise, and Singapore, the safe city, will perish just quite easily. Singapore is a safe city. But O such fragility. Naturally, Singaporeans play it safely, and safety measures are taken just as seriously. We shift our glances as we whisper about the PAP. We clam up when we’re invited by the Opposition parties. We follow the rules and do as we’re told. We keep up with the Joneses and we keep down our high jinks. Give us this day our OB markers, and forgive us our careless trespasses. Lead us not into Sedition, but deliver us away from Perdition. This way, Singapore will be a safe city, is a safe city, and Singaporeans will be brought to salvation – by the PAP – eventually.

***

Singapore is a safe city. Say it often enough, loudly enough, hopefully and daily, and it might become a miracle of the Singapore Story. In a city of drones, how unsafe can it get, seriously.

But what do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, where the voices are silenced, T-shirts are imprisoned, and human beings hanged. What do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, that forces upon me the false dichotomy, of liberty versus poverty, of ruling party over democracy. What do you say, Mr Kishore Mahbubani, if I don’t want to live in a safe city, safe to the point of stifling sterility, safe in a pool of nauseating conformity, safe in a tomb of deadly mediocrity. O Mr Kishore Mahbubani, hallowed be thy name, thy Singapore come, thy will be done. Lead me not into this safe, safe, city, but save me from this insane, insufferable, imperialism of safety.


[1] Kishore Mahbubani, “Why S’pore Enjoys a Low Crime Rate”, The Straits Times, 15 July 2009.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

颜金勇:四至五年内将爆发另一波疫情

卫生部长颜金勇相信,未来四至五年内将爆发另一波疫情,为此他希望人们在冠病期间培养的卫生习惯应继续维持,以应对未来可能爆发的新疫情。 在今日的记者会上,与颜金勇共同领导跨部门工作小组的教育部长黄循财,认为接下来一年半载,我国仍会继续笼罩在冠病19疫情下。 黄循财预计至少四、五年后就可逐步摆脱疫情,对此颜金勇有不同看法,直言下一波“其实不远”,提醒大家仍要保持警惕。 黄循财透露,未来一年至一年半政府将根据疫情放松一些措施,但整体上人们的生活不会有太多变化。 即使目前对冠病比较了解,但只要出现一名超级传播者,情况都可能会失控。 即便大部分国人都接种疫苗,然而其他国家疫情可能还在施虐、也可能无法在今年内完成接种疫苗。 另一方面,黄村才也称,随着农历新年到来,可能有更多人接触,当局正考量是否落实额外防疫措施,让社区传染情况保持在低水平。

过度依赖低成本劳动力、外籍专才 阮健平:疫情曝露我国经济结构弱点

新加坡前进党中委阮健平认为,冠状病毒19疫情, 揭露了我们经济结构上的许多弱点。我们过分依赖某些已被证明是高度脆弱的行业。 我们过分依赖低成本劳动力和外国的专业人员、管理人员、执行人员和技术人员。 他直言,国家对展示项目进行了巨额投资,这些项目给世界留下了深刻印象,但并没有直接造福我们的公民,特别是低收入人群。 在誌期5月29日的脸书贴文,阮健平针对政府近期公布的财政纾困方案表达看法。 尽管他支持政府采取的纾困方案,但也认为有必要确保来之不易的储备金得到有效的运用。 “首先,我们需要确保这些援助是否足够,而且是否提供给真正需要的人。 另外,由于时间紧迫,有关当局必须在最短的时间内把这些援助发放出去。” 对于个别家庭,突然失去收入来源,都是影响生存危机;但要说所有与企业是否都应获得政府的财政援助,则有待商榷,例如那些年年获利、向员工及股东发放丰厚的花红和股息的大企业,政府是否有必要发放援助? 中小企业形势更严峻 阮健平也是前丰隆亚洲首席执行员。他认为,许多大公司具有承受短期挑战并进行长期调整的财务实力和组织能力。反观中小型企业面对的情况却更为严峻。 “在新加坡,中小型企业(小型承包商、初创企业、邻里小店和小贩)是国家经济的重要组成部分,它们雇用约65巴仙的劳动力。如果这些较小的企业破产,许多新加坡人将会失去工作。”…

PM Lee files writ of summon to blogger to claim damages over allegations

Law firm, Drew & Napier LLC which represents Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has filed a writ of summon to claim damages from blogger Ngerng Yi Ling over allegations about PM Lee in an article published on his blog.

【武汉冠状病毒】3月6日增13确诊! 九病患与裕廊战备军人协会俱乐部聚餐有关

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至本月6日中午12时,本地增13起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,其中九位新增病患与此前裕廊战备军人协会俱乐部(SAFRA Jurong)举办的晚餐聚会有关联。 这意味着,上述感染群相关病患已增至17例,相关的病例是:第94、 96、 107、 112例;本月5日公布的114、 115、 116、 117例,以及今日公布的第 118、 120、 121、…