The following article is taken from Today.

PN Balji

IN A country where lines get blurred in so many areas, Nominated MP aspirant Calvin Cheng’s decision not to resign his Young PAP membership the moment he launched his bid to enter Parliament is understandable.

If those lines were clearly drawn into our collective DNA, I am quite sure Mr Cheng would have officially cut his links with the youth wing of the ruling party the moment he had made up his mind that he wanted to enter Parliament.

He did that only after a Today report highlighted the issue on Wednesday.

This 34-year-old media entrepreneur must have felt all that was needed was to be honest and upfront with the high-level committee that sifts through NMP applications and picks people it thinks will make a contribution to debate in Parliament. Mr Cheng says that he told the committee he was an “inactive member” and that the committee did not question him on this.

In defending his decision subsequently, he said his Young PAP membership expired two years after he joined the political organisation in 2006 and that he never even bothered to pick up his membership card. Now here is the real rub. He joined the Young PAP out of … you need to be ready for this word … curiosity.

Let me quote from a letter he wrote to Today: “I joined YPAP in 2006 when I visited the Teck Ghee PAP branch with a friend, and I signed up out of curiosity. Due to many reasons, I never returned.”

My, my … what does this say of this intelligent young man who graduated from Oxford and wants to be a member of the highest and most august chamber in Singapore?

Shall we dismiss this curiosity episode as a case of boyish candour?

I would have not bothered much if Mr Cheng had added this line in his letter: Looking back, I realise how wrong I was to treat my application to join an organisation like the YPAP in such a cavalier manner.

The burden is now on Mr Cheng; he has to prove to Singaporeans that the decision by the Special Select Committee, which includes two ministers and several backbenchers, to pick him is not misplaced.

As for the Young PAP, perhaps it needs to make sure that the people who want to join it do so for the right reasons and not for whimsical reasons like curiosity.

A veteran journalist, P N Balji is now the director of the Asia Journalism Fellowship, a joint initiative by the Temasek Foundation and the Nanyang Technological University.

Read also: 5 out of 9 new NMPs list MM Lee as their “favourite politician”.

——

——
Mr Calvin Cheng in the Straits Times:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Is the “controversial” AHPETC management fee really that controversial?

By Gangasudhan With much being said about the management fee being paid…

An extraordinary film – Burma VJ

Undercover Video Journalists in Burma keep up the flow of news from their closed country. Free screening in S’pore – 16 July.

What exactly is the change in PAP’s promise?

Howard Lee / As General Election 2011 was drawing to a close,…

学生群组公开 国大三年逾20起偷窥、猥亵问题

国立大学偷拍风波因受害者马芸公开而曝光,引起各界义愤。根据该校一个学生群组公开的一份校内清单,展示国大从2015-2018年的校内违规和纪律惩处记录,显示其中有超过20起涉及偷窥、非礼等纪律。 该校一个学生群组“国大学生联合”(NUSSU – NUS Students United Facebook page),在本月20日于脸书专页公布一份清单,是新加坡国立大学纪律委员会2015年至2018年的听证报告。 去年11月,23岁受害者马芸在校园宿舍洗澡时,遭到一名24岁男同学偷拍。但是有关涉事学生仅被给予12个月的有条件警告。马芸曾表示,自己因涉事者的行为陷入痛苦,无法接受他的惩罚这么轻,对方就好像发生事都没发生一样,继续生活。最终致使马芸选择在社交媒体公开,希望能警惕他人。 国大在事件曝光后,随即在官网公布,将设立检讨委员会,来审视与制定新的规章制度。 停学、踢出宿舍、强制辅导、罚款和道歉 本社简略整理国大学生群组公开的校内纪律记录,其中可见该校处分的纪律案例中,其中就有超过20起涉及非礼,违规行为类型包括男女性被偷拍、跟踪、偷窥、擅自闯入女性宿舍、猥亵、偷女性内衣物及触摸大腿与臀部等。…