Andrew Loh

Mas Selamat Kastari escaped from the Whitley Road Detention Centre on February 27, 2008.

It has been 90 days since.

There has been total silence on what the government is doing to capture him since the debate moved into the sphere of responsibility for the escape and the expressed desire of the government to repair its reputation.

The last thing that Singaporeans learned of the plans to capture the escapee was that the government was now adopting a “targeted approach based on intelligence”. This was on April 11.

The last time the Minister for Home Affairs gave any progress report to the public on the government’s plan to capture Mas Selamat was in Parliament on April 21. (Here and here)

The relative, some would say, total, silence since then is disconcerting, to say the least. This is especially so when you consider all that the government itself has said about the man – he is dangerous, he is “a wily person who could persuade his custodians”, and so on.

MM Lee Kuan Yew also warned Singaporeans about a ‘return hit’ if Mas Selamat has ‘crossed the border’. (CNA)

And:

One mistake and we’ve got a big explosive in our midst. So let’s not take this lightly. (MM Lee, New York Times)

So, why has there been total silence from the government about plans to capture this alleged ‘wily’ terrorist?

For one thing, the pre-occupation now is with ‘repairing’ the damaged reputation and image of the security forces, particularly the Internal Security Department (ISD). Indeed, all public speeches of late by government ministers were geared towards this end.

The then Law Minister, Professor S Jayakumar, urged Singaporeans to give the ISD officers their support on April 15. He said:

They have continued working patiently and resolutely with the detainees, their families, and the Malay community. These are crucial yet delicate tasks, and the officers deserve our full support.

(“JI escape: One blot should not mar good work, says Jaya”, Straits Times, April 15, 2008)

Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong echoed the Law Minister on April 26:

We have to repair our reputation, both as a government as well as a country. Our reputation has suffered as a result of the escape of Mas Selamat. But let’s look for ways to repair that.

(“SM Goh says it’s time to repair reputation after Mas Selamat’s escape”, Channel NewsAsia, April 26, 2008)

On May 26, the Minister for Home Affairs revealed the disciplinary action taken against eight officers for the escape – but still no update on what the capture plans are or whether there is any progress.

So, besides knowing that the government is now adopting a “targeted approach based on intelligence” and that the government believes Mas Selamat is still in Singapore, the public does not know what else the government is doing to capture the most wanted man in our island.

This is in acute, sharp contrast to the media frenzy which followed immediately the escape in February.

It thus seems that the government, and the security forces, have not learned their lesson which many have criticized them for initially – failure to provide the public with adequate and accurate information about Mas Selamat and the government’s plans to re-capture him.

Again, it looks like there is a lack of accountability and transparency.

Perhaps repairing the government’s reputation is more important than providing the public with crucial and timely information which may help in capturing the alleged terrorist.

And by the way, how long is the government giving the Home Affairs minister to capture Mas Selamat before it decides that failure in doing so warrants the minister assuming full responsibility? Even in Parliament today (May 26), all that the minister would do was to reiterate that the government believes Mas Selamat is still in Singapore – and nothing further.

Sir, I said on the 21st of April, that we’ve no information that Mas Selamat has left. It’s the same position that we still hold today.

The minister has had 90 days already – to capture a limping terrorist, with the entire security force at his disposal, in this tiny island.

The buck, surely, must stop somewhere.

——————–

Read also: Breaking News: Supertintendent of detention centre sacked over Mas Selamat’s escape (with video of DPM’s Wong’s speech in Parliament.

——————

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

日本NHK电视台节目 关注狮城贫富悬殊问题

我国贫富不均问题也引起日本国营媒体日本放送协会(NHK)电视台的关注。在有关电视台制作的时事节目提及,虽然新加坡看起来繁荣进步,但是也有一些贫穷或老弱群体流浪街头,只求一餐温饱。 NHK电视台在前日于官方脸书专页分享题为《新加坡的另一面》节目视频,其中NHK时事评论员道传爱子指出,新加坡在一般外国人眼中都是繁荣、干净、安全和有效率的,但是高速发展下,也有一些老弱和贫穷的群体,不敢奢求国家经济繁荣,只求能温饱肚子。 有关节目在上月就在日本放映,节目采访了我国知名福利团体“愿之家”(Willing Heart)创办人郑东尼,为推动福利事业和扶助弱势群体不遗余力。 道传爱子在节目中访问郑东尼,询问为何说新加坡的贫穷问题是“隐形”的?郑东尼解释,新加坡人多数住组屋,当每间组屋关起门来,那么要如何理解邻里的生活情况?为此愿之家成员做家访,去关怀一些独居或需要帮助的老人。 郑东尼也协助有需要的低收入客工,例如为他们提供免费膳食等。 “如果国人不快乐,应找出问题出在哪?” 主持人在节目中询问郑东尼,新加坡是否是快乐的国家?对此郑东尼回答:“我们理应是快乐的,如果不快乐,是不是哪里出问题了呢?那就要改变,纠正错误。” 节目也指出,当贫富差距问题越来越不容忽视,也有许多关怀社会的国人挺身而出,为社会关怀出力。 而郑东尼也积极向年轻一代宣扬社会关怀的意识,重视弱势群体对社会的贡献。 道传爱子则提到,新加坡也是全球老龄化最快速的国家之一,到了2030年,有四分之一人口年龄将超过65岁,退休后他们只能靠储蓄生活,但相对下生活成本高昂,为此贫穷问题对年长者影响很大。 道传爱子也向日本群众介绍,我国有强制性的公积金制度,以及就业入息补贴计划(WIS),为低收入劳动者补贴,但是还是有一些低收入群体滑落社会安全网外,为此国内有许多如“愿之家”的福利团体,积极为贫穷和弱势群体提供援助。…

35,000 jobs – or 20,000 jobs?

Why the discrepancy in jobs created by IRs? asks Andrew Loh.

两度被发现蟑螂出没! 餐厅被令停业两周

裕廊坊购物中心的西餐厅双胜Swensen’s一年内两次被发现有蟑螂出没,食品局勒令暂停关闭两周,并罚款800元。 食品局本周一(25日)发声明表示,双胜西餐厅于一年内两度被发现有蟑螂出没,分别被记六分,累计满12分,因此自25日起被勒令停业,直至下个月7日。 根据条例,业者在12个月内若累计12分以上,其营业执照将被暂停两至四周或吊销,且所有处理食物的工作人员将需上食物卫生课程,及格后才能重返岗位。 针对食物卫生一事,当局也将严阵以待,因此呼吁业者必须时刻遵守良好卫生习惯,并只聘用合格员工。 若发现任何违规情况,将会立即采取行动。 当局也建议公众若发现有食肆卫生情况欠佳,请勿光顾并上网填写表格,或致电68052871提供资料,以便当局跟进调查。

Viral message claiming fines for those without masks; no such regulations yet

A message has been making the rounds on social messaging platforms and…