This is part 2 of the article on entrepreneurship by Leounheort. Part 1 can be accessed here.

In a conservative society, anything new is automatically treated with fear and suspicion if it contradicts current social norms. Homosexuality, for example, is still an issue the State beats about, even until today. It is still socially unacceptable to be a homosexual, just because one does not have the same sexual preferences as most other people, for some strange reason.

Conservatism is backed by one thing, and one thing only: everything that has worked in the past has worked and made things safe; there is therefore no need to change. This inductive logic works all the way until the moment it does not. It assumes a kind of permanence in the world, but in reality, the world is in a constant state of flux. The advent of globalisation has merely made this more apparent: behold the fall of once-mighty superpowers and the rise of formerly-thought hopeless cases, meaning, of course, the former USSR and Singapore post-secession from Malaysia.

The conservative mindset would, therefore, in the long run, be ineffective, for it does not allow one to adapt to changing times. Despite this, Singaporean society is still reportedly conservative, and so it shall stay until this mindset is abandoned for a more dynamic one.


Conservative mindsets

At the same time, it must be remembered that our so-called ‘Knowledge-Based Economy’, as outlined in the previous edition of Social Studies textbooks, is based on an analysis of our globalising world. As stated earlier, the fast-adapting man is king. Knowledge is a valuable commodity only as long as it is relevant to a rapidly developing field. Once that field’s promise has dried up, and interest moves on to another field, anybody who is left behind is in for a tough time.

Unless, of course, he can create a new breakthrough that re-incites interest in that field, but such a person is usually driven by passion, not by money, as stated above. People who do move on are usually not bound by a conservative mindset, i.e. he should take up only certain jobs because they are high paying, high status, or whatever; or a rigid one, i.e. he has been in this field previously, so he should find the same job somewhere else, unless of course it is his passion.

Instead, he has a different mindset: he takes up a job because it interests and excites him, in whatever way; and if something better comes along, he should take it to further his own goals. In this way, he takes risks by doing something very few, if any, people have done before, taking the chance that he might fail.

Conservatism is opposed to this risk-taking, for it favours the sure-fire tried-and-true, which remains true until it does not, as opposed to the novel and new that might possibly fail, yet pay off handsomely when successful.

The fear of failing

Those who overcome this fear of failure, make the right decisions, and are appropriately flexible, become heroes of a sort. Those who do fail are laughed at for their failure. Those who do not take the chance remain in the status quo, or perhaps are left behind in a deteriorating field. The first scenario is the ideal. The second is the more realistic, but contains the possibility of evolving into the first if the person picks himself up and carries on, unafraid of failing. The third is the worst-case scenario, because the person does nothing to improve his lot, and remains where he is for the foreseeable future and beyond.

If Singapore were to survive, she must have a high number of entrepreneurs, as defined above. The blueprint of Singapore’s economic survival, indeed, that of every nation in our interconnected world, must begin with an entrepreneur with a bright idea.

Using his creativity, he brings that idea to fruition. He is then faced with rigidity, and perhaps opposing Orders, which he then attempts to overcome by magnifying the strength of his creative force through taking risk, in order to increase the magnitude of the physical manifestation of a hoped-for success; and by imbibing his creative force with his will, to force himself through the layers of rigidity he faces. He may choose to join forces with other like-minded individuals to enhance this. By fighting against rigidity, he is applying his knowledge and ideas in an effort to combat opposing knowledge, i.e. that which prevents him from executing his ideas, in the same way as described above.

Breaking out of the “Order”

If he succeeds, he breaks out of his current Order, and forms a new one, drawing upon the creative aspect of his will to power. If he were lucky, he and his associates would have weakened the rigidity he had to face, perhaps even falsifying some of its underlying ‘knowledge’ through a combined effort, over a period of time. He then markets this new Order that he possesses, by taking up or creating a job based on its application, to benefit whomever he wishes, most probably himself and others. It could, for example, be something as simple as setting up a shop run by cancer patients in a hospital, or something as complex as establishing a billion-dollar media empire. This cycle then continues with a new breed of entrepreneurs, in the same or different fields, as more innovations and insights take place.

As stated earlier, Singapore needs creativity in order to survive. But in order for this to happen, we must first overcome the greatest barriers in this country: our mindsets. If the entrepreneur can overcome the materialist mindset (better yet, not even possess it, or be motivated by it instead of being constrained by it), he would not be overburdened with financial concerns, and would be more willing to take more risks with a lower capital. If the entrepreneur can overcome the conservative mindset, he could break new ground in existing Orders, or create new, probably niche, areas that are marketable in the KBE. This is, of course, assuming that said entrepreneur is creative and intelligent enough to see his ideas to fruition.

But this is survival in the economic sense. What about in the cultural sense? A nation is merely the sum total of the cultural influence of a country. We do not have much of a culture to speak of; therefore we would not have much of a nation, if we even have one. In order for us to have a powerful culture, one that creates a nation, we need artists. Note that I use ‘artist’ very loosely: it comprises of philosophers, directors, writers, musicians, just about anything that is driven by ideas, expands on ideas, and raises new ones.

“Artistic entrepreneurs”

These entrepreneurs are, perhaps, the more abstract form of entrepreneurs: business entrepreneurs use existing ideas to back their business, while artistic ones draw their business from their ideas. The former, for example, is like a man who runs an art gallery that sells paintings; the latter is akin to the painter who creates those paintings before selling them to the former. Naturally, there are fields where these two entrepreneurs come together, and some people have displayed qualities of both.

Despite this, it is the artistic entrepreneur who has the hardest time, anywhere in the world. His creativity is undeniably purer than even the business entrepreneur: the businessman bases his actions on at least one goal, meaning earning money, which is an unoriginal idea; the artist does not care about money, and instead strives to exercise his creativity by creating creative works based on his original ideas, and nobody else’s.


To be continued in part 3.

 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Art industry tenants need Govt’ rebates and cash grant “the most”, says lawyer Ryan Su

Deputy Prime Minister Heng Swee Keat earlier on 26 May announced that…

马国:禁从中国港口离境、过境邮轮入马

马来西亚政府宣布,禁止任何中国港口离境或过境的邮轮,入境马国。 迄今马国的武汉冠状病毒确诊病例已增至22起。马国此前禁止任何不愿与执法单位分享重要资讯的外国船只入境。 与此同时,马国政府也不允许那些仍在柬埔寨的“威士特丹号”乘客,进入我国。 “威士特丹号”本月1日从香港出发,载有2257名乘客,包括1455名乘客和802名船员。 但连日来“威士特丹号”遭多国政府拒绝靠岸。直至13日才成功获得柬埔寨政府允准停靠柬埔寨西哈努克港。一些乘客则获安排转机到马国,准备返国。不过飞到马国的145名乘客中,其中一名83岁美国女乘客经测试确诊患病,致使多达六人被拒登机。 不过其余六名乘客(4名美国人和2名荷兰人)对武汉新冠病的检测,皆呈阴性。

乌节豪杰大厦命案:两名被告转为共谋蓄意伤人 一人面对谋杀控状

乌节豪杰大厦命案,再有两名被控嫌犯,26岁的陈云胜和洪大源,控状改为共谋蓄意伤人,目前只有陈显扬仍面对谋杀控状。(部分人名译音) 该起命案发生于去年7月2日,发生在乌节豪杰大厦里,死者是31岁的沙迪斯(Satheesh Noel s/o Gobidass)。 死者当时在二楼夜店疑似和被告们起冲突,遭他们围攻,颈部中刀后逃跑,却最终重伤倒在商场门口,随后被送往陈笃生医院急救,却因伤势太重而回天乏术。 警方于12小时内将七人逮捕归案,分别是陈云胜、陈家兴(26岁)、洪大源、萧玉珍(22岁)、陈显扬、卢文聪(25岁)以及陈洪成(22岁)共6男1女在谋杀罪名下被控。 陈云胜和洪大源被指涉及对沙迪拳打脚踢。洪大源的案子将展延到下月的审前会议,控方或对他提出进一步指控。 若罪成,陈云胜和洪大源可被判最高两年监禁、最高罚款5千元或两者兼施。 这意味着其中六人的控状已减轻,只有陈显扬面对谋杀指控。他被指当天携带了一把可折叠的弯刀。 若谋杀罪名成立,被告可能面对死刑,而在公共场所持有攻击性武器者,则将可能面对不超过三年的监刑,和不少于六下的鞭刑。

NTU student debunks fabricated news about himself, condemns how SPH publishes unconsented news

As the saga of Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) and an NTU student…